ZONING CODE UPDATE ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-level SEPA SEIS Comprehensive Plan Amendments Zoning Changes JCC Title 17 (Development Regulations) Development Agreements (With Proponent) LegislativeAdministrative.
Advertisements

Model Home Permitting and Temporary Certificates of Occupancy Orange County BCC January 27, 2015.
LAFCO Procedures: There’s a Lot Going On Behind the Scenes Roseanne Chamberlain Executive Officer Amador LAFCO Staff Workshop April 3, 2008.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
Sharman S. Brooks Senior Planner Kristine Goddard, AICP Principal Planner
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
MUNICIPAL LAND USE APPROVAL PROCESS “How To Navigate The System” City of East Orange, NJ Mayor Robert L. Bowser Joseph Jenkins, City Administrator James.
Project-level SEPA Comprehensive Plan Amendments Zoning Changes JCC Title 17 (Development Regulations) Development Agreements (With Proponent) Legislative.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
Land Use & Code Basics Baseline Information on Permits and Processes.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PEARLAND PLANNING DAY MARCH 13, 2008.
Broadview Second Access. Parlette Annexation What has changed? Parlette has asked for reconsideration –Recitals in agreement are not operative provisions.
March 10, 2015 Second Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15  Second.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Staying Legal 95% of plan commission and BZA processes are administrative Staff makes judgment calls routinely.
TREE REMOVAL POSTING PROCESS On-site posting on site (yellow sign) and website 5 Working Days Building Permit Application and Tree Removal Plans (sent.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Zoning Ordinance Update 15 MAY Purpose and Intent Update Comprehensive Plan ( ) Update Zoning Ordinance (2012) Implementation and Adjustment.
Island County Planning and Community Development Permitting 101.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
The Rezoning Process CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING.
Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart for County Code (Zoning & Land Use) Violations COMPLAINT RESEARCH AND PRIORITIZE.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Site plans/Lot of record/Tenant houses Subdivision Plats Combined Preliminary/final Addition Correction Plat of public taking Plat of court action Preliminary.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
City of Lacombe 2014 Development Symposium Outline Plan Process at the City: Outline Plan Process Application/Circulation 1 week from date of receiving.
AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.
Administrative Code Amendment
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Community Development November 2011
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
Division of Waste Management
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
From Public Hearing to Sound Decision
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Code Amendments to SMC 19A Planning Commission Meeting
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Land Development Code (LDC)
West Virginia Economic Development Council Open Meetings Act Training 2018 Derek Knopp Staff Attorney West Virginia Ethics Commission.
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Code Amendments to SMC 19A Planning Commission Meeting
By Krista Whitman Assistant County Counsel May 2, 2016
Myersville Planning Commission
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
City of Coral Gables Zoning Code Re-Write.
City Hall Departments 2020 Budget.
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Board of County Commissioners
Land Use Planning Community Workshop
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
By Krista Whitman Assistant County Counsel May 2, 2016
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

ZONING CODE UPDATE ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES Planning Commission Study Session February 15, 2017

PROGRESS SO FAR Draft code mostly completed Converted to ordinance form Completed legal review SEPA Determination issued

CHANGES Previously, condense, correct, clarify Repealed subdivision process in existing code, moved all to new WMC 21.61 Repeal and replace all of WMC 21.83 for review procedures (fixes order and content) Hearing examiner decision appeals to Superior Court

21.83 REVIEW PROCEDURES Major re-writing of chapter since the re-organization Updated for clarity and ease of reading Right chapter… wrong order Procedure types Procedure consolidation Pre-application Completeness Decisions Expiration Hearings Interpretations Revisions

21.80 DECISION CRITERIA Provides information for (nearly) every permit issued by the City When is the permit required? When is the permit approvable? If listed somewhere else in code, provides a handy reference point

SUBDIVISIONS Short plat, short subdivision: 4 lots or less Long or preliminary plat, subdivision: 5 lots or more Numerous code provisions applicable to the process: 21.60 criteria and standards 21.61 processing 21.22 density and dimensions 21.50 trees 21.51 critical areas 21.81 public facilities 21.83 review procedures 15.04 street improvements 15.05 grading code Infrastructure standards Stormwater standards 21.84 noticing and hearings

PROCESS Preliminary plat Site work Final plat Home construction Feasibility of platting. Meets lot requirements, infrastructure requirements. Conceptual – requires enough detail to establish that it complies with all codes Grading and drainage plans + construction. Construction plans and details on how the site will be shaped based on the preliminary plat. Official recording of the plat. Verifies construction has been completed per plans, all previous conditions were met. Legal lots established – building permits for homes

PROCESS x Complete application Notices Planning Review Building Review Public Works Review Fire Dept Review Inspections Hearing Council Review Recording x Preliminary plat Site work Final plat Home construction

Preliminary Plat Review – WMC 21.61.020 Applicability Public Notice Public Hearing Criteria Decisions Hearings Approval Criteria Infrastructure Improvements Bonding

NEXT STEPS Staff will make any Planning Commission recommended changes More internal reviews Public hearing

21.80 DECISION CRITERIA Provides information for (nearly) every permit issued by the City 21.80.010 Purpose 21.80.170 Right-of-way permit 21.80.020 Determination of consistency 21.80.180 Shoreline conditional use permit 21.80.030 Building permit 21.80.190 Shoreline substantial development permit 21.80.040 Boundary line adjustment 21.80.200 Shoreline variance 21.80.050 Binding site plan 21.80.210 Sign permit 21.80.060 Conditional use permit 21.80.220 Site development permit 21.80.070 Critical areas alteration/determination 21.80.230 Special use permit 21.80.080 Critical areas exception 21.80.240 Subdivisions and short subdivisions, preliminary 21.80.090 Design review 21.80.100 Flood improvement permit 21.80.250 Subdivisions and short subdivisions, final 21.80.110 Flood variance 21.80.260 Temporary use permit 21.80.120 Home industry permit 21.80.270 Tree removal permit 21.80.130 Home occupation permit 21.80.280 Variance 21.80.140 Land use project approval 21.80.290 Wireless service facility 21.80.150 Master signage plan 21.80.300 Zone map amendments, site specific 21.80.160 Reasonable use permit

21. 81 ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 21 21.81 ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 21.82 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA Important sections… but not critical for updates at this time Warrants specific and separate attention Related docket item for sewer connections in 21.81 Staff is deferring update to a later time

TYPES OF PERMITS TYPE 1 Building Grading Right-of-way Design review Home occupation permits TYPE 2 Short plats Land use approval Wireless facility Binding site plans Critical areas alteration TYPE 3 Subdivisions Conditional use Variances Shoreline permits Zoning map amendments Administrative approval Routine, staff-level decision Administrative approval Director-level decision Quasi-judicial approval Hearing Examiner level

PROCEDURES - DETAILS CODIFIED What items need to be included in a decision Building permit: signed plans, issued permit document Subdivision: Written findings, signed plans What applications vest and for how long Hearing procedures (staff report, proceedings, ex parte communication) When a decision is “final” Criteria for requesting an extension When an interpretation is appropriate

21.84 NOTICES Notice of application Notice of hearing Clarify contents (file number, site plan, where to review materials, SEPA) Notice of hearing Clarify contents (how to find materials, hearing procedure code, where and when) How long before a public hearing Notice of final decision SEPA, appeal process, reassessment information Who to send Where to notice Mail, City Hall, Post Office, newspaper, on-site, and website

21.85 AMENDMENTS Combines Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendment procedures Identical process, written differently in code Procedure – Application, due date, Planning Commission, City Council Decision Criteria Growth Management Act Applicable countywide planning policies Goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan Result in long-term benefit to the City as a whole, and to the health, safety, and welfare of its residents; and Advances the public interest

NEXT STEPS Staff will make any Planning Commission recommended changes Staff and attorney review with changes Subdivisions will be added in due to placement in existing code “Translate” into an ordinance with strike-out deletion Public hearing and ordinance

PROCEDURES TYPE 3 HOW? WHEN? Over the counter Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period HOW? WHEN? Over the counter Submittal checklist 28 days after submittal Mail, post, publish 14 days after completeness To each department Typical 14-30 day review By project manager When review is completed By applicant Within 90 days of comments Mail, post, publish 15 days before hearing Public, hearing examiner Post, publish 10-15 days after hearing By party of record 14 days after decision issued

DECISION CRITERIA (21.80, 21.81) TYPE 3 When does a permit apply? Page 1 DECISION CRITERIA (21.80, 21.81) TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period When does a permit apply? What criteria is the City reviewing to make a decision? What minimum infrastructure needs must be met?

REVIEW PROCEDURES (21.83) TYPE 3 Permit consolidation process Page 14 REVIEW PROCEDURES (21.83) TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period Permit consolidation process Pre-application meeting process Opportunity to identify issues and concerns Processing procedures Vesting

COMPLETENESS (21.82.020) TYPE 3 28 days after receiving application Page 18 COMPLETENESS (21.82.020) TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period 28 days after receiving application Must have all information on the submittal checklist unless waived by staff Formal letter sent identifying whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required Provides a tool for vesting If the code changes, what code is the project subject to?

NOTICE OF APPLICATION (21.82.020) Page 27 NOTICE OF APPLICATION (21.82.020) TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period 14 days after completeness Minimum information required Permit number Description Comment Period Post to site, post office, City Hall Mail to property owners within 500-ft Publish in Woodinville Weekly

REVIEW PROCESS TYPE 3 Routed to applicable departments Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period Routed to applicable departments Building Planning Public Works Fire Typical 2-4 week review period City’s review must be completed within 120 days Comments are collated by project manager and sent to applicant

COMMENT LETTER TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period May include requests for additional plan sheets, corrections to typos, or major changes to project Applicant must respond within 90 or 120 days or the application lapses May request time extension if needed Steps 5 and 6 are repeated until the application is ready

NOTICE OF HEARING TYPE 3 15 days before hearing Page 28 NOTICE OF HEARING TYPE 3 Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period 15 days before hearing Minimum information required Permit number Description Hearing date Post to site, post office, City Hall Mail to property owners within 500-ft Publish in Woodinville Weekly

HEARING TYPE 3 Hearing examiner or City Council Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period Hearing examiner or City Council Open public hearing, public is invited to comment Decision must rely on the “record” – information and testimony provided Staff provides a staff report summarizing code compliance Staff, applicant, and public each provide a perspective Hearing body issues a decision 10 business days after the close of the hearing

PERMIT ISSUANCE TYPE 3 Relies on decision criteria for approval Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period Relies on decision criteria for approval Does it meet the standards and specifications? Does it meet the intent and purpose of the code? Does it uphold the public health, safety, welfare? Any remaining fees are rectified Applicant receives the permit paperwork and approved set of plans Includes conditions regarding construction, mitigation, replanting, etc. Can be general or site-specific Permit valid for between 2 and 5 years

APPEAL PERIOD TYPE 3 14-day appeal period Application submitted Staff determines application complete Notice of application Application routed for review Comments sent to applicant Corrections submitted Notice of hearing issued Hearing Permit issued Appeal period 14-day appeal period Only parties of record can appeal Type 1 permits: City and applicant Type 2 permits: +commenters Type 3 permits: +public hearing attendees Admin appeal goes to the next highest body Hearing Examiner City Council Judicial appeal goes to King County Superior Court