Uniformity in Kentucky Bluegrass Germination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Advertisements

Virtual Referee for Asteraceae I- Lettuce Referee Introduction.
JMG Emulsions laboratory demonstration Ultra Bond 2000 TM Successful Hydro-seeding application.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Making Inferences and Justifying Conclusions S-IC Math.S-IC.5. Use data from a randomized experiment to compare.
Response Surface Analysis of Seed Germination Percentage and MTG of 6 Basil Cultivars By Emily Zhou Department of Horticulture STAT 5606 Spring 2013.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
2013 AOSA/SCST Mid-West Region SORGHUM WARM TEST REFEREE A comparison of the 10 day AOSA warm test to a 7 day warm test.
Example: Statistical Estimation Consider taking a sample of size n from a large population of seeds of the princess bean (Phaseotus vulgaris) and record.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 10. Hypothesis Testing II: Single-Sample Hypothesis Tests: Establishing the Representativeness.
2014 AOSA/SCST Mid-West Region SORGHUM WARM TEST REFEREE A comparison of the 10 day AOSA warm test to a 7 day warm test.
Measures of Position. ● The standard deviation is a measure of dispersion that uses the same dimensions as the data (remember the empirical rule) ● The.
Housing of Teachers at Eau Claire Memorial and Eau Claire North By: Tommy Stahl.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
STA 200 Spring Objective  We want to be able to extrapolate results from a sample to the population at large.  In order to do this (and reach.
AOSA/SCST Region IV - Southwest Referee 2013 Phaseolus vulgaris - Organic Media Comparative Germination Testing Presented by David M. Johnston, RST Monsanto.
 (Worse) Our algorithm is more accurate with respect to computational time.  (Better) Our algorithm is more accurate than conventional ones with respect.
Introduction Effect of temperature on germination behaviour and early growth of Pinus halepensis M. seeds. Thekla Tsitsoni 1, Aimilia Kontogianni 1, Marianthi.
Does Anxiety Vary by Gender and Race During Adolescence? Alyson Cavanaugh, Kelly A. Cheeseman, and Christine McCauley Ohannessian University of Delaware.
Chapter 14: Analysis of Variance One-way ANOVA Lecture 9a Instructor: Naveen Abedin Date: 24 th November 2015.
Your first experiment! TASIS Biological Investigators, Inc. Contract Biological Research at competitive prices!
National Referee Comparison of Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) purity test results with and without applying the factoring procedure to the multiple.
Table 1. The Five Medical Laboratory Case Studies Jan Martin et al. Transnational Evaluation of a New Continuing Professional Development Activity for.
28th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Symposium.
Plant Improvement Bill and International Organisations 3 May 2016 BRIEFING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
Seed Testing Survey Tina Tillery ENCRUSTED, COATED AND PELLETED POACEAE SPP.
Agar Media Corn and Tomato National Referee 2014
AOSA/SCST Region IV - Southwest Referee 2013 Phaseolus vulgaris - Organic Media Comparative Germination Testing Presented by David M. Johnston, RST.
NW Referee Effect of storage conditions on seed viability and vigor of fine fescue.
Agar Media Corn and Tomato 2015 National Referee
HEAT STRESS TEST BRASSICA SPP.
Shortened Soybean Germ
Feasibility of Discontinuing the Factoring Procedure in Fine Fescues
Southwest Region Referee 2016
LECTURE EIGHT Seed Programme Development New and improved crop variety become a significant agric input only when pure high quality seeds are available.
Grass Seed Mixes Sharon Davidson, RST 2016.
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
Identification of Clover Seeds
Prechill vs. Non Prechill
Comparison of Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata)
Based on in Vitro Seed Germination of Rice Cultivars.
Inferential Statistics
2014 AOSA/SCST Mid-West Region SORGHUM WARM TEST REFEREE
STATISTICS Random Variables and Distribution Functions
Feasibility of Shortening the Germination and Fluorescence Test Period
National Referee Agar Media Corn Germination 2016
Implementation of a Shelf Labeling and Grocery Store Tour Program in a Low-Income Community Value Store of Houston, Texas Presented by: Brittany Kaczmarek.
Week 2 LT Assignment DUE: 10/17/2011 MTH233
Shortened Soybean Germ
How to Read Seed Labels.
فسيولوجيا نبات أ. د محمد نصرالدين هلالي أ. د محمود محمد درويش أ
Inferences and Conclusions from Data
Zone 5 Southern 2016 Bahiagrass Referee Results
2016 Onion Germination Referee Results
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Does Decoating effect germination over time?
Title of Study Presenter names Major department names
Homogeneity.
2016 Onion Germination Referee Results
Shortened Soybean Germ
Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.
Mean Absolute Deviation
FLOWER SEED Germination Referee Results
Hemp U.S. EPA SFIREG JUNE 3-4, 2019.
FLOWER SEED Germination Referee
Zone 5 Southern 2018 Argentine Bahiagrass Referee Proposal
Terry Dunfield RST –Eurofins BDI, Longmont CO
Clover Referee Preliminary results on clover planting media
Hot Pepper Germination
S1 Science Planet Earth topic
Seedling emergence of Shepherd's needle (Scandix pecten-veneris)
Presentation transcript:

Uniformity in Kentucky Bluegrass Germination Performed By Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture

Objectives of the Referee Comparing the Germination results among the Seed Analysts Surveying the uniformity among the Seed Analyst participants from both AOSA and SCST

Procedures of the Project Participants received 9 blind Kentucky Bluegrass samples Participants required to test them according to the AOSA Rules without pre-chill Results are recorded in percentage (%)

Sample A, Sample D and Sample I Same Lot Number Camas Kentucky Bluegrass Test Date 12/10 The Mean of Sample A, D and I are 84, 82 and 84 respectively. Standard Deviation for A: 4.47, D: 3.91 and I: 4.59

Sample B, Sample E and Sample H Same Lot Number Solar Eclipse Kentucky Bluegrass Test Date 4/13 The Mean of Sample B, E and H are 77, 76 and 76 respectively Standard Deviation for B: 4.72, E: 5.04 and H: 4.78

Sample C, Sample F and Sample G Same Lot Number Ginger Kentucky Bluegrass Test Date 8/13 The Mean of Sample C, F and G are 85, 85 and 85 respectively Standard Deviation for C: 2.52, F: 3.16, G: 2.77

Applications There are 2 scenarios: 1. Results chosen for labeling: a. Higher Germination percentage than Regulatory laboratories: violation can be issued if the result is out of germination tolerance with Regulatory laboratories b. Lower Germination percentage than Regulatory laboratories: no issue 2. Results from Regulatory laboratories: a. Higher Germination percentage than label: no issue b. Lower Germination percentage then label: issue violation if the result is out of germination tolerance with labeled results.

If the percentage was used for labeling Example of Scenario 1 If the percentage was used for labeling 90 89 88 87 85 83 82 81 80 77 69 Number of times it would fail the other percentages as regulatory tests 15 9 6 2 1 This case, the result is labeled result, and the rest of the results are regulatory results 406 possibilities when comparing analyst to analyst Total 77 times it would fail the other percentages as regulatory tests There are 18.97% chance of possibility the analyst will be out of tolerance when compare one to one If the label is 90%, it would fail 15 times If the label is 69%, it will be within the tolerance of the regulatory tests

If the percentage was the regulatory result Example of Scenario 2 If the percentage was the regulatory result 90 89 88 87 85 83 82 81 80 77 69 Number of times it would be out of tolerance with the other results as the labeled % 1 3 6 11 27 This case, the result is a regulatory result, and the rest are labeled results 406 possibilities when comparing analyst to analyst Total of 77 times it would be out of tolerance when compare with the label % There are 18.97% chance of possibility the analyst would be out of the tolerance when compare one to one If Regulatory result is 90%, it would be within the tolerance of the labeled percentage If Regulator result is 69%, it would be 27 times out of tolerance of the labeled percentage.

Observations The Mean of each sample is consistent with its respective samples The Standard Deviation are higher in older crops: less consistency in seedling evaluation The newer the crop, the more consistency in seedling evaluations: low Standard Deviation. Base on the scenarios: Sample A, D and I: 18% of the time the result would be out of tolerance when compared one to one Sample B, E and H: 15% of the time the result would be out of tolerance Sample C, F and G: 6% of the time the result would be out of tolerance

Observations Cont. According to Germination Tolerance Table 14J: Sample A and B has 1 significant outlier that is out of tolerance with the rest of the group. They are also out of tolerance of their respective samples. 1 outlier within tolerance of oneself with the same lot number samples: showing consistency in seedling evaluation 82% of the analysts that tested A, D and I samples are within tolerance of each other when comparing one to one (12/10) 85% of the analyst that tested B, E and H samples are within tolerance of each other (4/13) 94% of the analyst that tested C, F and G samples are within tolerance of each other (8/13)

Thank You to all the Participants