Mobility Fund High Impact/Low Cost Projects: Cape Fear RPO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
Advertisements

State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Cobb County Non-Profit Grant Process FY 15/16. Agenda Welcome- Karen Carter, Cobb Community Collaborative Background/Budget- Buddy Tesar/Mary Anna Gunther,
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
Insert Table of Eligibility 1 Statewide MobilityRegional ImpactDivision Needs Eligible Projects: Statewide Regional Statewide Regional Division Overall.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Illinois American Planning Association State Conference Complete Streets and Beyond Todd Hill, Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Illinois Department of.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Module 13: Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGC)
Washington State Transportation Improvement Board U RBAN F UNDING P ROGRAMS 2012.
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
2013 Legislative Session: Challenges and Outcomes Kathleen A. Conaboy Steve Canavero, PhD Nevada State Public Charter School Authority Presentation to.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
March 10, 2015 Second Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15  Second.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
Petition to Council re Homestead Road/Weaver Dairy Road Extension May 9, 2005.
December 2015 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Funding Lauren Blackburn.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Public Information Meeting St. George Road - Oak Hill Road Intersection Reconstruction Project.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
Intersection Design Spring 2017.
Adjusting Speed Limits
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
STI Prioritization and Programming Process
Idaho Transportation Department (ITD)
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway
Shawn D. Wilson, Ph.D. Secretary
VAM Primer.
Project Management Team Meeting #3
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
CAPITAL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Project Evaluation
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Cobb County Nonprofit Grant Process FY 17/18
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Overcoming Barriers to Implement Research Projects
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Midblock Crossings Lesson 12 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
ALABAMA COURSE OF STUDY #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 AND #7
HOT Lanes on I-77 Today vs 2010 May 6, 2013.
Transportation Forum for Northern Virginia’s Elected Leaders April 23, 2018 Presented by: Monica Backmon, Executive Director.
Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Board Transportation Committee May 6, 2014
Idaho Freight Rail – Covered by Freight Program Manager
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Meadow Lake Boulevard Street Extension Project
S.R. 26 Road Rehabilitation in Clinton County
State of SCDOT Feb 2019 Introduce Commission and Direct Reports.
Regional Transportation Sales Tax Transportation Investment Act of 2010 and Transportation Funding Act of 2015 as of April 5, 2017.
State Infrastructure Bank
MPO Board Presentation
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
Adopt a Resolution of the City of Pasadena Approving the Submittal of a Functional Classification Change for Local Streets and Roads to the State of California.
Prioritization Explained
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Interlocal Cooperative Agreement FY 20
Presentation transcript:

Mobility Fund High Impact/Low Cost Projects: Cape Fear RPO Darius Sturdivant, NCDOT Division 6 February 7, 2018

Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Senate Bill 257: Appropriations Act of 2017 Sec. 34.7: Use of Funds in Mobility/Modernization Fund Effective July 1, 2017 OVERVIEW: Funds appropriated to the Mobility/Modernization Fund in the Highway Fund, shall be used by NCDOT as follows: 40% or ($20M/yr.) for a Spot Mobility Program; 12% or ($6M/yr.) for Economic Development, Small Construction, and Industrial Access Projects; 48% or ($24M/yr.) for High Impact Low Cost construction projects. Senate Bill 257 identifies 3 new funding sources: Spot Mobility Program; Economic Development/Small Construction and Industrial Access; and High Impact Low Cost Construction projects. TOTAL NEW FUNDING SOURCES = $50M/yr Senate Bill passed and became law on July 1, 2017.

High Impact Low Cost Construction Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Construction Projects 2 years of funding has been appropriated (approx.) $48M For each Division $3.428M (2 year funding total) or $1.714M/year per Division Projects must meet certain eligibility requirements Each Division, in cooperation with their respective Planning Organizations, is required to select project scoring criteria and weighting used for project selection

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Requirements Total (12) default Project Selection Criteria – must choose a minimum of (7) for scoring projects Each Division, must work with Planning Organizations within their respective geographic areas to select project scoring criteria and weighting used for project selection. Divisions, in cooperation with Planning Organizations also had the option of developing additional scoring criteria beyond the default criteria.

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Project Selection Criteria (12 Default Criteria) High Impact/Low Cost Project Selection Criteria   % Weight 0 points 1 point 2 points Traffic Volume Current Volume/AADT 750 or less 751 to 1499 1500 or more Use most recent AADT Map volume or other available traffic volume count Traffic Restrictions Number of Restrictions no restrictions 1 restriction 2 or more Restriction types could include weight postings (roads and/or bridges), lane width postings, no truck/limited truck access, light traffic ordinances, or other local restrictions identified by the Divisions/local governments Safety Combined Safety Score 0 to 33 33 to 66 66 to 100 provided by mobility and safety Roadway Characteristics existing lane width standard width or above below standard NCDOT/AASHTO Design Guidelines existing shoulder width pavement condition score 80>100 70>=80 >=70 use most recent pavement condition survey score stopping sight distance 495 ft or more 251 ft to 494 ft 250 ft or less intersection turning radius standard radius or above Level of Service (LOS) LOS Improvement 1 letter grade 2 letter grades 3 letter grades or more Intersection LOS improvements may be measured for overall intersection or individual approach improvements (up to two approaches) Multimodal Benefits Non-Highway modal components included in project no non-highway benefits includes benefits to at least one non-highway mode Determined by Divisions Other Funding Availability no other funding 1% to 19.99% 20% or above Other funding sources are available to offset project costs. Other sources can include other highway funded program dollars (contingency, economic development, small construction, etc.) or local funding participation. With the exception of trust fund economic development projects, STI funds should not be considered. County Economic Well Being (NC Dept of Commerce County Tier Designation) County Tier Designation Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Based on current county tier designation as identified by the North Carolina Department of Commerce: Tier 1: 40 most distressed counties Tier 2: Next 40 distressed counties Tier 3: 20 least distressed counties Total: % weights for the scoring criteria selected must total to 100%

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Division 6 Project Selection Criteria & Weights Division 6 High Impact/Low Cost Project Selection Criteria   % Weight 0 points 1 point 2 points Traffic Volume Current Volume/AADT 14 500 or less 501 to 999 1000 or more Use most recent AADT Map volume or other available traffic volume count Safety Combined Safety Score 15 0 to 33 33 to 66 66 to 100 provided by mobility and safety Roadway Characteristics Existing lane width > 12' 10'- 12' < 10' NCDOT/AASHTO Design Guidelines Existing paved shoulder width > 2' 1' - 2' no paved shoulder Multimodal Benefits Non-Highway modal components included in project no non-highway benefits includes benefits to at least one non-highway mode Determined by Divisions: Constructing paved shoulders; widening existing paved shoulders and/or widening travel lanes along roads as identified in Statewide, Regional and/or locally adopted Bicycle Plans. These types of improvements will include benefits to at least one non-highway mode Other Funding Availability no other funding 1% to 19.99% 20% or above Other funding sources are available to offset project costs. Other sources can include other highway funded program dollars (contingency, economic development, small construction, etc.) or local funding participation. With the exception of trust fund economic development projects, STI funds should not be considered. County Economic Well Being (NC Dept of Commerce County Tier Designation) County Tier Designation Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Based on current county tier designation as identified by the North Carolina Department of Commerce: Tier 1: 40 most distressed counties Tier 2: Next 40 distressed counties Tier 3: 20 least distressed counties Total: 100 % weights for the scoring criteria selected must total to 100%

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Requirements Divisions, in cooperation with their respective Planning Organizations must determine the appropriate scoring weights for each of the criteria selected. Projects must receive at least half of the total possible scoring points to be considered for funding. Division 6: Minimum Project Score = 7pts Max Project Score = 14pts Each Division must develop a list of projects to submit to the Board of Transportation for funding approval.

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Requirements Projects funded through this program, unless otherwise approved by the Secretary of Transportation are expected to be under construction within 12 months of funding approval by the Board of Transportation. Funding shall not exceed $1.5M on any single project unless otherwise approved by the Secretary of Transportation. Any project exceeding $250K will require a resolution of support from the appropriate local government agency prior to the authorization of funding.

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Division 6 Project Selection Methodology District Engineers submitted candidate projects. Scoring Criteria was applied to determine project selection. Total of 15 candidate projects from across the Division were selected for funding approval. Coordination with local governments. Local governments were asked to pass resolutions of support (where applicable). Projects were presented to the Board of Transportation for funding approval (February 2018). Upon funding approval, projects will be programmed for construction in FY 2018 and FY 2019.

Total Estimated Project Cost FY 2018/FY 2019 = $3.4M Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Division 6 FY 2018/FY 2019 Projects Division 6 Project Programming Results: Bladen – 2 projects; Total Estimated Project Cost = $600,000 Columbus – 5 projects; Total Estimated Project Cost = $700,000 Cumberland – 3 projects; Total Estimated Project Cost = $912,000 Harnett – 4 projects; Total Estimated Project Cost = $448,000 Robeson – 1 project; Total Estimated Project Cost = $740,000 Total Estimated Project Cost FY 2018/FY 2019 = $3.4M Projects selected must be under contract within 12 months of BOT approval Explanation of funding results (variance in # of projects and total project cost per county) Avoided projects that required purchasing R/W purchase and moving utilities – adds time and money

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Columbus County Project Locations

Project Cost: $25,000 Funding Year: FY 2018 Project Description: Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Project Cost: $25,000 Funding Year: FY 2018 Project Description: Construct 2 ft symmetrical widening and resurface SR 1403 (W. Railroad Street) from SR 1352 (Cherry Street) to SR 1407 (Church Street) – [0.19 mi].

Project Cost: $50,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Project Cost: $50,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Construct 2 ft symmetrical widening and resurface SR 1407 (Church Street) from SR 1403 (W. Railroad Street) to US 76 – [0.42 mi].

Project Cost: $250,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Project Cost: $250,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Construct 2 ft symmetrical widening and resurface SR 1352 (Cherry Street/Cherry Grove Road) from SR 1004 (Rough and Ready Road) to SR 1403 (W. Railroad Street) – [2.29 mi].

Project Cost: $75,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Project Cost: $75,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Construct 2 ft symmetrical widening and resurface SR 1347 (Fronis Strickland Road) from NC 904 to SC State Line – [0.61 mi].

Construct left turn lane on US 701 at SR 1546 (Bill Hooks Road). Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Project Cost: $300,000 Funding Year: FY 2019 Project Description: Construct left turn lane on US 701 at SR 1546 (Bill Hooks Road).

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Next Steps – Division 6 All projects have been added to the Board of Transportation agenda and were presented for approval at the February Meeting. For projects exceeding $250K, District Engineers have sent Resolutions of support to local governments for approval. Most resolutions are on local board agendas for January/February meetings. District Engineers will begin including High Impact/Low Cost projects in the next round of resurfacing projects (Spring 2018).

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Next Steps – NCDOT Management After all projects statewide have been approved by the Board of Transportation, NCDOT Management is required to submit a report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee by March 1, 2018. The report will include the types of projects submitted, funding amounts, criteria selection process, criteria used and project scoring methodology for each Division. The goal is to demonstrate there is a need to make High Impact Low Cost Construction a permanent funding source. Report to JLTOC to be presented by Patrick Norman – Director of Highway Operations

Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects Questions ??

High Impact Low Cost Projects Mobility Fund – High Impact/Low Cost Projects High Impact Low Cost Projects Contact Information: Darius Sturdivant Division 6 Planning Engineer Email: ddsturdivant@ncdot.gov Phone: (910) 364-0600