Microbial Diversity Comparison Between Water and Sediment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
Advertisements

Yaron Fireizen, Vinay Rao, Lacy Loos, Nathan Butler, Dr. Julie Anderson, Dr. Evan Weiher ▪ Biology Department ▪ University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire From.
Microbial Diversity.
The Sorcerer II Global ocean sampling expedition Katrine Lekang Global Ocean Sampling project (GOS) Global Ocean Sampling project (GOS) CAMERA CAMERA METAREP.
Zachary Bendiks. Jonathan Eisen  UC Davis Genome Center  Lab focus: “Our work focuses on genomic basis for the origin of novelty in microorganisms (how.
Aquarium Biogeography and Succession of Microbial Communities in Aquatic Built Environments Nitrification Results in Coral Pond 1 The nitrite levels in.
Determining Microbial Assemblages in Snow Using Different Growth Media Ama Agyekum Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania Introduction.
Chapter 17 Prokaryotic Taxonomy How many species of bacteria are there? How many species can be grown in culture? Bergey’s Manual Classification Schemes.
DNA Fingerprinting of Bacterial Communities. Overview Targets gene for ribosomal RNA (16S rDNA) Make many DNA copies of the gene for the entire community.
Molecular Microbial Ecology
Microbial Community Biomarker in Barnegat Bay Evangelina Pena 1, Lora McGuinness 1, Gary Taghon 1, Lee Kerkhof 1 Introduction Efforts to remediate anthropogenic.
Introduction Nitrogen is one of the most essential nutrients for plant growth and development. However, plants are unable to use nitrogen in its natural.
H = -Σp i log 2 p i. SCOPI Each one of the many microbial communities has its own structure and ecosystem, depending on the body environment it exists.
Is The Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus Increasing Among York College Students? By: Angel Newson Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Diversity of bacteria associated with Montastraea spp. across sea water quality gradient in the United States Virgin Islands S. Arora, M.E. Brandt, N.
Accurate estimation of microbial communities using 16S tags Julien Tremblay, PhD
Fluidity of the 16S rRNA Gene Sequence within Aeromonas Strains Alessia Morandi Institute for Infectious Diseases University of Berne.
Identification and Classification of Prokaryotes
Biology 22 Molecular Laboratory Report 1. Bacterial Transformation 2. Plasmid Isolation 3. RFLP Analysis RESULTS ONLY due on April 21 st, 2011 Discussion.
DNA TECHNOLOGY AND GENOMICS CHAPTER 20 P
Big Picture Of ≈1.7 million species classified so far, roughly 6000 are microbes True number of microbes is obviously larger than 6000 “Imagine if our.
Diversity and quantification of candidate division SR1 in various anaerobic environments James P. Davis and Mostafa Elshahed Microbiology and Molecular.
Diversity and Functional Variation of Denitrifying Bacterial Communities in the Cape Fear River Estuary Brian Shirey Marine Biology.
It was observed by many employees at a local supermarket that their hands were commonly dirty after handling money. A question arose in that is the money.
Background Gregory Fischer Julie Anderson Daniel Herman  Department of Biology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Heterologous expression of MBP1 from.
Accurate estimation of microbial communities using 16S tags
University of Essex BIODEEP-WP3 Analysis of species diversity, community structures and phylogeny of microorganisms and meiofauna in the Mediterranean.
Diversity of Soil Microbes. Approaches for Assessing Diversity Microbial community Organism isolation Culture Nucleic acid extraction Molecular characterization.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A)
Introduction Biodiversity is important in an ecosystem because it allows the species living in that ecosystem to adapt to changes made in the environment.
Use of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer and its effect on soil quality. Soil bacterial population Hernandez, Jorge D., Garcia, Rosalia. and Lightfoot,
Bacterial Infection in the Dungeness Crab, Cancer magister Sarah Dunn, Hannah Pramuk, David Scholnick and Györgyi Nyerges Pacific University, Department.
Dragon Fly Larvae Genetic Barcoding References 1.What is DNA barcoding? (2015) Retrieved from barcoding(n.d.).
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A) DNA.
MIC 203: ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Quantitative Ecology: Numbers, Biomass and activities Course Teacher: Fazle Rabbi, Lecturer Microbiology program, MNS.
Soil Microbiome of Native and Invasive Marsh Grasses in Blackbird Creek, Delaware Lathadevi K.Chintapenta 1#, Gulnihal Ozbay 1#, Venu Kalavacharla 1* Figure.
Infectious agents in inflammatory bowel disease
Prokaryotes capture solar energy
Linnea K. Honeker*, Julia W. Neilson, Jon Chorover, Raina M. Maier
Quantitative Phylogenetic Assessment of Microbial Communities in Diverse Environments Xinjun Zhang.
Metagenomic Species Diversity.
What is Lurking on your Pocket Change?
DNA Technologies (Introduction)
American Society of Microbiology North Central Branch Meeting
Microbial Community Analysis of a Floating Island System in a Stormwater Wet Detention Basin Danielle Winter, Dessy Owiti, François Birgand, Terrence Gardner,
The African Soil Microbiology project
Biolog identification
By Stephen Adeniyi June, 2015
The Microbial Diversity in Wet Soil and Dry Soil at Buffalo Creek
Workshop on the analysis of microbial sequence data using ARB
Conclusions & Future Directions
The Difference in Microbial Diversity Between Moving
Analysis of Double-Stranded RNA from Microbial Communities Identifies Double- Stranded RNA Virus-like Elements  Carolyn J. Decker, Roy Parker  Cell Reports 
By Pete Kahn Mentors: Lydie Herfort and Peter Zuber
H = -Σpi log2 pi.
C. Bertelli, G. Greub  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
C. Bertelli, G. Greub  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Detection and identification of plasma bacterial and viral elements in HIV/AIDS patients in comparison to healthy adults  S.-K. Li, R. K-K. Leung, H.-X.
Effectiveness of Different Hand Soaps on Survival of Microorganisms
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
The Six “I’s” of Microbiology
Diversity of Soil Microbes
Joe Stern Pittsburgh Central Catholic Grade 9
Comparison of one-tube multiplex PCR, automated ribotyping and intergenic spacer (ITS) sequencing for rapid identification of Acinetobacter baumannii 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
The Biodiversity of Water Mites in Freshwater Ecosystems
Microbial Diversity between Buffalo Creek and a Retention Pond
Toward Accurate and Quantitative Comparative Metagenomics
Addressing Antibiotic Resistance by Isolation and Characterization of Genus Lysobacter and Genus Unknown Antibiotic-producers in Pittsburgh Soil Miriam.
Presentation transcript:

Microbial Diversity Comparison Between Water and Sediment Christina Gonzalez and Meagan St. John Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Longwood University Background Results Microbial diversity is well understood to be a fundamental factor in aquatic ecosystem between microbes in the water and sediment of lotic environments. Factors that are involved in influential variation on the ecosystem processes can result in affecting microbial diversity of the aquatic realm1: Hydrology Contamination Nutrient availability Figure 4. Characteristics of colonies based on variations of form, elevation and margin per collection layer. In this figure the inner region of graph contains the percentage of colonies for the sediment layer and the outer region contains the water percentages. Figure 5. Total percentage of bacteria per collection site based color classification. This graph contains three-color variations that were obtained per collection layer. PCR Sediment MspI Sediment PCR Water MspI Water 2000 1550 1000 750 500 400 300 200 100 50 Figure 1. Relative abundance of major bacterial phyla and subphyla based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. (A) all samples with habitats and locations on the x-axis and compartment type bracketed by dashed lines, (B) average community composition for each compartment 1. Figure 6. Gel electrophoresis base pairs amplified PCR products of MSP1 product. The base pair DNA ladder displays the size of the original sample DNA product and the restriction digest sample to measure the length of the DNA fragment. Figure 7. The progression rate of bacteria growth was measured over a 48-hour duration period. Data was obtained after 24 hours and after 48 hours. Bacteria identification % Identity # Of Gaps # Of Differing Base Pairs Gram Strain Identification Pseudomonas brenneri strain CFML97-391 99 3 4 Gram Negative Aeromonas encheleia strain CECT4342 1 2 Figure 3. Number and biomass of prokaryotes in the world3 . Figure 2. Taxonomic distribution of the biogas community. Legend: Allocation of assembled contig sequences to microbial genome. Results were obtained by best M5nr database hits. Bacteria dominate the community, Archaea represent about 10% of the microbiome2 . Table 1. The top alignments for 16s rRNA sequence of the water and sediment samples, respectively. Specific Aim Conclusions The bacteria colonized from the benthic and photic realms (sediment and water) presented two distinctly different communities, regardless of identical collection site from a freshwater ecosystem; the sediment sample displayed more microbial diversity as hypothesized. The dominant explanation of the differences in microbial communities is the habitat type7. A study conducted on abundance of prokaryotes based on habitat presents correlating results. The number of prokaryotic cells in the environment is directly proportional to the abundance of carbon in the cells5 (Figure 3). Purpose: Compare the differential variation in the composition of the microbial community and indicate microbial clusters present in the water versus the sediment in lotic ecosystems to determine the bacterial diversity and variability. Hypothesis: The bacterium comparison from the sediment and water samples will display significant differentiation in the degree of microbial diversity; the bacterium communities in the sediment sample will display greater diversity than that of the water sample. Sample Collection Types: Sediment sample Water Sample Gather environmental samples from Buffalo Creek Plate the samples to observe colony composition (from, color, growth) Bacterial Culture the samples One colony from each sample was selected for DNA isolation Isolate genomic DNA 16s rRNA was sequenced using Sanger Sequencing Gel Electrophoresis on PCR and Msp1 digested products PCR and Gel Electrophoresis Inserted data sequence BLAST to compare it to known bacterium sequences Sequence Analysis of both bacterium Methods Each isolated bacterium from the two sampling sites also support high microbial diversity: Bacteria sequenced from water sample: Pseudomonas brenneri strain CFML 97-391 Previously found in natural mineral waters in France6. Gram-negative with a single flagellum Bacteria sequenced from sediment sample: Aeromonas encheleia strain A Previously found in unpolluted surface and underground waters in Czech Republic4. Anaerobic, gram-negative bacterium Future Directions Many more bacterial samples must be obtained from various ecosystems in Prince Edward County to determine the overall microbial diversity. Microbial diversity affects community composition, stability and function at a local level. Community composition is critical in order to understand the community function and structure to seek new medications for probiotics and determine the presence of chemicals5. Further studies may be performed, focusing on the prevalence of harmful bacteria present in both the water and sediment, to determine the ecological effects on the lotic ecosystem. Literature Cited 1Zeglin LH. 2015. Stream microbial diversity in response to environmental changes: review and synthesis of existing research. Frontiers in Microbiology. [Feb];6. 2Roland Wirth, Etelka Kovács, Gergely Maróti, Zoltán Bagi , Gábor Rákhely, and Kornél L Kovács. 2012. Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 5:41 3Whitman W, Coleman D, Wiebe W. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Internet]. 1998; [cited 2017 April 2]; 95: 6578-6583 4Novakova D, Svec P, Sedlacek I. Characterization of Aeromonas encheleia strains isolated from aquatic environments in the Czech Republic. The Society for Applied Microbiology. [Internet]. 2008; [cited 2017 April 2]; 48: 289-294 5Curtis T and Sloan W. Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology. Current opinion in microbiology. [Internet]. 2004; [cited 2017 April 2]: 7: 221-226 6Baida N, Yazourh A, Singer E, Izard D. Pseudomonas brenneri sp. nov., a new species isolated from natural mineral waters. Research in microbiology. [Internet]. 2001; [cited 2017 April 2]; 5: 493-502 7Feng B, Li X, Wang J, Hu Z, Meng H, Xiang L, Quan Z. Bacterial diversity of water and sediment in the Changjiang estuary and coastal area of the East China Sea. Federation of European Microbiological Societies. [Internet]. 2009: [cited 2017 April 2]; 70: 236-248