IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
Low PAPR Binary Preamble Design
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Effect of FCH repetition on the detection of FCH and MAP
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
[place presentation subject title text here]
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
Fractional Bandwidth Usage
On Coexistence Mechanisms
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
[Comparison between CDMA Code and Contention-based Access]
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
ATSC DTV Receiver Performance Multipath Equalization
Contribution on Location Privacy
IEEE WG Opening Report – March 2007
November Opening Report
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
“Comment Status” Definitions
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
OFDM Parameters And Preambles
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2006-08-22 PAPR Comparison IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2006-08-22 Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.22. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.22. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Carl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.22 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@iee.org. >

PAPR Comparison

The current draft includes the PN sequences for only 1 preamble of each kind (there are four kinds, SF, F each one with long and short PN sequence) There is a mistake in the generator polynomial for the Q component described in the draft, which was then corrected. The PAPR of each of the Preambles, proposed in the draft, was calculated, the results which vary from 8-11 are given in the following table

IEEE802.22 PAPR summary table: PAPR Issues The PRBS seed for the Q part was defined, in the draft, incorrectly. The old one was defined as and it didn`t match the result sequence. Philips sent us the new, correct one . IEEE802.22 PAPR summary table: (dB) 7.8552 9.4196 8.6174 10.7822

IEEE802.16 PAPR graph (114 PN sequences) Average PAPR of all set of 114 Preambles is between 4.2-4.8dB

PAPR description (IEEE802.22 PAPR ) The figure shows the signal power. The red line is the maximum power of the signal. The cyan line is the average power of the signal. The PAPR is the ratio of the red and the cyan line

2300 samples within the OFDM symbol IEEE802.16 PAPR (Worst Case) 2300 samples within the OFDM symbol

Comparing the PAPR of the proposed preambles with the numerous number of 802.16 preambles shows a significant advantage of the later preambles over the former. In real life where a large number of deployed Base Stations, a big set of preambles is necessary. This important property is not supported in the current draft, allowing a generation of only 1 Preamble of each kind. Use of a lower PAPR has a significant impact on RF chain, especially on the linear power amplifier. Reduction of 3dB in PAPR is translated into reduction by 50% in power dissipation of the RF chain Our recommendation is definitely use of 802.16 preambles