Colin Evans, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phytoplankton absorption from ac-9 measurements Julia Uitz Ocean Optics 2004.
Advertisements

Analyse de spectres Doppler de la surface de la mer en bande L G. Soriano*, M. Joelson**, P. Forget #, M. Saillard # * Institut Fresnel, UMR CNRS-Université.
Lynn K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, M. Powell 2, B. Haus 1, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, RSMAS 2 Hurricane.
El Niño Effects on Goleta Coast Wave Climate
Correlations between NAM forecasts of banded snow ingredients and snowfall, for a broad spectrum of snow events Mike Evans and Mike Jurewicz NOAA/NWS Binghamton,
Wave Measurements from SeaSondes. Measurements Significant Wave Height Wave Period Peak Wave Direction Wind Direction.
Correlations between observed snowfall and NAM forecast parameters, Part I – Dynamical Parameters Mike Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY November 1, 2006 Northeast.
Success Stories – Making a Difference Optimizing HF Radar for SAR using USCG Surface Drifters Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Josh Kohut, Scott Glenn Rutgers.
Success Stories – Making a Difference Optimizing HF Radar for SAR using USCG Surface Drifters Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Josh Kohut, Scott Glenn Rutgers.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems (4) Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ext 251 Dunes of sand.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ph: Dunes of sand and seaweed,
Coastal Ocean Observation Lab John Wilkin, Hernan Arango, John Evans Naomi Fleming, Gregg Foti, Julia Levin, Javier Zavala-Garay,
National Center for Secure and Resilient Maritime Commerce and Coastal Environments (CSR) CSR Scott Glenn, Hugh Roarty Rutgers University Washington DC.
SeaSonde Overview.
Assessment and Quantification of HF Radar Uncertainty Fearghal O’Donncha Sean McKenna Emanuele Ragnoli Teresa UpdykeHugh Roarty.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Towards a Standard for Real-time Quality Control Procedures for in situ Ocean Waves Richard Bouchard 1 and Julie Thomas 2 1.NOAA’s National Data Buoy Center.
Ligurian Sea Mid-Atlantic Bight Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut, Erick Rivera,
Outline Glider acoustics Combustive sound source inversions 3D effects of front and internal waves Papers in progress Preliminary Results James H. Miller.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
L. K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, B. K. Haus 1, Brad Parks 1, Peter Vertes 1, Lew Gramer 2, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical.
InvestigatorAffiliationInvestigatorAffiliation A. AllenU.S. Coast GuardL. AtkinsonOld Dominion University A. F. BlumbergStevens Institute of Technology.
Ocean Wave and Current Radars By Laura Elston. Our earth is a very aqueous environment with nearly three quarters of it covered by ocean. So how do we.
reporter:葉宗穎 YEH-ZONG-ZING Supervisor:鄭志文教授 Prof. Zhi-Wen Zheng
Ocean Weather Station M - from weather forecast to climate monitoring Ingunn Skjelvan Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research and Geophysical Institute, University.
AWIPS-2 HF Radar Sea-Surface Current Product By Ross Van Til Contributions by: Nicole Kurkowski, OS&T Dr. Pablo Santos, WFO Miami Dr. Jack Harlan, NOAA.
Sang-Ho Lee*, Hong-Bae Moon, Chang-Soo Kim Dept. Oceanography, BK21 Team, Kunsan Nat’l Univ., Korea Accuracy of currents measured by HF radar in the coastal.
The VIEW antenna is located on an open beach and is more isolated from structures which can cause distortion; therefore, its pattern shape is similar to.
Application of Radial and Elliptical Surface Current Measurements to Better Resolve Coastal Features  Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn 
Goes with Activity: Measuring Ocean Waves
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Mr. Robert Forney Dr. Hugh Roarty Dr. Scott Glenn Measuring Waves with a Compact HF Radar MTS/IEEE OCEANS15 October 2015 Washington DC.
L. K. (Nick) Shay, J. Martinez-Pedraja and M. Archer Department of Ocean Sciences, RSMAS To improve our understanding of surface processes and their linkages.
Irish Sea Public domain: From Irish National Tidegauge NetworkIrish National Tidegauge Network Mean spring tides.
Atmospheric profile and precipitation properties derived from radar and radiosondes during RICO Louise Nuijens With thanks to: Bjorn Stevens (UCLA) Margreet.
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
By Graham Woods School of Engineering, James Cook University
Real-Time Beyond the Horizon Vessel Detection
Oceanic Observation and Typhoon Forecast in CMA
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
QA/QC Methods for 13 MHz Brant Beach (BRNT) Test Case
Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network
Evaluation of Three Antenna Pattern Measurements for a 25 MHz SeaSonde
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
A Closer Look at CODAR HF Radar Spectra
MARACOOS High Frequency Radar Network Operations
Bistatic Systems: Preparing for Multistatic
COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM present
The Langmuir Cell Dri dataset Taken March/April 2017
Application of 13 MHz SeaSonde Systems for Vessel Detection
OCG High Frequency Radar
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University
Hugh Roarty, Michael Smith, Ethan Handel and Scott Glenn
Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn March 5th, 2015
Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Analysis of the Wind Resource off New Jersey for Offshore Wind Energy Development Hugh Roarty, Joe Riscica, Laura Palamara, Louis Bowers, Greg Seroka,
HF Radar Systems Engineering Plan
Recognizing First and Second Order Features
October 27, 2011 New Brunswick, NJ
MARCOOS PI Meeting Outreach & Education Update
Ocean Winds.
OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY
LCDR George Wright, USN OC 3570 – Winter 2008 Friday, March 14th 2008
Assessment of the Surface Mixed Layer Using Glider and Buoy Data
An Ocean Current Monitoring System for Coastal New Jersey
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Tsunami.
Coastal Ocean Dynamics Radar (CODAR) Mapping of
Wind Energy Potential in Europe: 2020 – 2030
Presentation transcript:

Colin Evans, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut Examination of the SeaSonde Wave Processing Parameters and the Effects of Shallow Water on Wave Measurements Colin Evans, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut

Motivation Aid in the understanding of coastal ocean dynamics. Determine if HF Radar can be used as a “filler” between in situ wave measurements. Potential use of sea-roughness as input to WRF (Weather Research & Forecasting) model.

Study Grid 90 yd. watch radius 70 yd. watch radius 44065 44009 RATH WOOD BRMR SPRK 90 yd. watch radius 70 yd. watch radius *Radar range cells and NDBC buoy locations within 30 m. isobaths.

Shallow Water Thresholds 25 MHz SeaSonde 13 Mhz 2nd Order Bragg 1st Order Bragg *For 13 MHz, wave height for radar saturation about 7.5 m. Lipa et al. (2008).

2nd Order Bragg – No Shallow Water Effects Range Cell 8, ~24 km 1st Order Bragg Ratio of 1st Order to 2nd Order. 2nd Order Bragg scatter from sea-echo. * Spectra from Range Cell 8 showing evidence of waves.

2nd Order Bragg – No Shallow Water Effects Range Cell 5, ~15 km Ratio doesn’t change as depth decreases.

2nd Order Bragg – No Shallow Water Effects Range Cell 2, ~6 km *Range cell 2 spectra. Shallow water does not effect wave measurements.

2nd Order Bragg – Shallow Water Effects *Breezy Point, NY – 25 MHz operating frequency

2nd Order Bragg – Shallow Water Effects 2nd Order: 1st Order increasing with decreasing water depth.

2nd Order Bragg – Shallow Water Effects Magnitude of 2nd Order still increasing relative to 1st Order Bragg scatter (~10db increase).

NDBC Buoy Station Comparisons Big difference in wave height measurements between buoys. Could be due to varying ocean conditions at different locations for that timestamp. February, 2012 Station 44065 Station 44009

Radar/Buoy Wave Height Comparison SPRK BRMR Note: SPRK was compared with NDBC station 44065.

Radar/Buoy Wave Height Comparison RATH WOOD

Wave Height Differences between SeaSonde and In Situ NDBC buoys * - R.C. 2 - R.C. 3 453:696 526:696 298:511 270:511

Correlations: Wave Height differences < 0.5 m 2. BRMR 1. SPRK R values ranged from 0.86 to 0.91 when the wave height differences were < 0.5 m compared with NDBC buoys. 3. RATH 4. WOOD

Concluding Remarks 60% of the data points were within 0.5 m or less when compared to NDBC discuss buoy measurements. R correlation values ranged between 0.86 and 0.91 when the wave height differences were < 0.5 m. Shallow water effects did not significantly influence wave height measurements for the SeaSonde 13 MHz system during February, 2012. CODAR currently working on shallow water software. Questions and comments?