2018 Proposal Writing Webinar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Science Foundation Innovation Through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Kathleen Bergin Program Director Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
Advertisements

2014 Proposal Writing Workshop January 9, 2014 Co-sponsored by the: National Science Foundation & American Association for the Advancement of Science.
National Science Foundation Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 29-31, 2013 Washington, DC.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
ADVANCE PAID Proposal Preparation
Research Grant Proposal Writing: Bucknell Trends and Faculty Perspectives Mike Malusis, Tom Solomon, and Rick Rosenberg Engineering Faculty Learning Series.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
EAS 299 Writing research papers
Two Year College Bert E. Holmes Carson Distinguished Chair of Science at UNC-Asheville and formerly Program Officer in Division of Undergraduate Education.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
2011 Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
RESEARCH ON EDUCATION AND LEARNING (REAL) Program Solicitation: NSF NSF Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings.
Proposal Writing Webinar February, Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Initiated by Act of Congress in 2002 Reauthorized in 2007 (America COMPETES.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) EHR Core Research Program (ECR) Program Announcement: NSF
2012 Proposal Writing Workshop Co-sponsored by the: National Science Foundation & American Association for the Advancement of Science.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
1 The Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Program V. Celeste Carter Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Jody Chase, Tribal Colleges and Universities Program Sylvia James, Innovative Technology Experiences.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference July 7-9, 2010 Washington, DC.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Nancy Lutz, Program Director Economics NSF Day Conference SUNY Albany, October 2011.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
HI-TEC Conference Session, 10:30-11:15 a.m.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
STEM Education Workshop
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Faculty Early Career Development program CAREER part 1
Helpful Hints & Fatal Flaws
Helpful Hints & Fatal Flaws
An Overview of NSF REU Site Program in Geosciences
NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, Program Lead
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
How to Succeed with NSF: September 14, 2018
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, NSF
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
University of the Incarnate Word
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

2018 Proposal Writing Webinar Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, NSF 17-541 2018 Proposal Writing Webinar Webinar Focus: Track 4: Noyce Research Track Kathleen Bergin & Andrea Nixon kbergin@nsf.gov anixon@nsf.gov Division of Undergraduate Education

2 ways to interact during webinar Respond to the polls. Write in the Q/A window. Note: Your QUESTIONS & COMMENTS are really important to us, so please take advantage of these two mechanisms.

POLL – Getting to Know You! How familiar are you with the Noyce program? 3 answer choices: Very familiar, Somewhat familiar, Not very familiar (only select one) Do you currently serve on the leadership team for a Noyce funded project? 2 answer Choices: YES or NO (only select one) What is your area of expertise? 4 answer choices: STEM faculty member, Education faculty member, Researcher, Other (can select more than one) Have you submitted a proposal to NSF in the last 15 years?

Webinar Outline Track 4: Research Track NSF 17-541 Q & A #1 Funding Levels Important Notions, Factors & Resources Grantee Eligibility Q & A #1 Preparing the Proposal Merit Review Criteria Q & A #2 Proposal Writing Tips Q & A #3

Track 1: S&S Track 2: TF Track 3 (MTF) Track 4: Noyce Research Scholarships & Stipends Undergraduate STEM majors and/or STEM professionals Track 2: TF NSF Teaching Fellowships STEM professionals Track 3 (MTF) NSF Master Teaching Fellowships Exemplary, experienced STEM teachers Track 4: Noyce Research Research related to STEM teacher effectiveness, persistence, and retention in high-need LEAs Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Solicitation NSF 17-541 *Capacity Building projects, which may lead to the development of full proposals for Tracks 1, 2, or 3, are also supported.

Track 4 (Noyce Research) No Previously Funded Noyce Projects Required Researchers + STEM faculty + STEM education faculty Up to $800K for up to 5 years Noyce Projects Substantively Involved Researchers + Noyce projects + STEM faculty + STEM education faculty Up to $800K + $100K for each Noyce project not to exceed $2.3M for up to 3 years Track 1 (S&S) Scholarships & Stipends undergraduate STEM majors and/or STEM career changers Track 2 (TF) NSF Teaching Fellowships STEM career changers Track 3 (MTF) NSF Master Teaching Fellowships exemplary, experienced STEM teachers Track 4 (Noyce Research) Research on teacher effectiveness, persistence, or retention in a high-need school district Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

Important Notions to Attend to: FOCUS MUST BE ON: STEM Teacher effectiveness, persistence, or retention in high-need school districts (HNSD). Examples of possible research studies: Teacher characteristics or programmatic features predictive of highly effective teachers who persist in teaching in HNSDs Persistence of Noyce Scholars or Fellows as teachers in HNSDs beyond their service requirement Identify characteristics of HNSDs that result in retention of STEM teachers Note: These are just examples and do not span the scope of research studies possible to examine STEM teacher effectiveness, persistence or retention in HNSDs.

More important factors to attend to Research studies must include: Substantive collaboration among STEM faculty, STEM education faculty, and researchers in education (and/or the social, behavioral, and economic sciences) Theory which underlies the research design Provide appropriate methodologies & strategies Contribute to the knowledge base of scholarly research in STEM education Note: Studies that involve examination of only a single institution’s teacher preparation program are discouraged unless the proposal provides a compelling argument that the results can be generalized to the larger community.

Critical Resources The first two below MUST be used: Solicitation 17-541 Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG), NSF 18-1 Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development Design-Based Implementation Research (DBIR) tenets nsfnoyce.org

Eligibility for a Noyce Grant Proposals may be submitted by: One or more universities, four-year colleges, and/or two-year colleges; or U.S. nonprofit entities that have established consortia among such institutions of higher education (IHE); or Professional societies and similar organizations that are directly associated with educational or research activities (for Track 4: Noyce Research only) No restrictions on the number of proposals per organization No restrictions on the number of proposals (or tracks) per PI or Co-PI

Q & A # 1 15 minutes

Proposal Due Dates for NSF 17-541 Tuesday, August 28, 2018 for FY19 funds Last Tuesday of August, Annually Thereafter Note: No new Noyce solicitation was released in 2018.

Project Summary (1 page) Overview: The first sentence must - indicate the specific Track of the proposal (e.g., S&S); and name all institutions, including high-need local educational agencies and non-profit organizations as appropriate, that are involved in the proposal. Intellectual Merit (How important is this work & how well designed is the project?) Broader Impacts (What is the benefit of this work to STEM Education, to society?)

Intellectual Merit (Required) Importance to advancing knowledge and understanding Creative, original, and/or potentially transformative Proposers’ qualifications Sufficient access to resources Proposed activity well-conceived and organized Evaluation Data management plan and Post-doc mentoring plan, if applicable deleted

Broader Impacts (Required) Promote teaching, training, and learning Broaden the participation of underrepresented groups, new institutions, influence on field, etc. Enhance the infrastructure for research and education Partnership development Disseminate results broadly Benefit society

Poll – True or False Quiz Track 4 Proposals Must: Involve Noyce Scholars, Fellows, or Projects Include both qualitative and quantitative methods Include letters of support detailing access to appropriate data Identify the methods to be used to answer the research questions as well as a description of the sample to be studied

Q & A # 2 15 minutes

Poll – One Question Quiz Check all the following that should be included in the Proposal? Project Summary with Intellectual Merit & Broader Impacts Labeled 15-Page Project Description Dissemination plan Prior NSF Support (if applicable) Research Question(s) Research design, data sources, methodology Relevant Research literature Objective external feedback

General Tips for Success Be aware of other projects and advances in the field. Cite the literature. Include details and all requirements per solicitation. Discuss prior (including Noyce) NSF results. Include plan for objective external feedback (evaluator or advisory board) w/ timelines and benchmarks. Propose a cost effective but high impact project. Put yourself in the reviewers’ places. If resubmitting previously declined proposal, consider reviewers’ feedback. Do not resubmit same declined proposal. Have someone else read the proposal. Call or email cognizant Noyce Program Officers.

Other EHR Programs of Possible Interest Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE: EHR NSF 17-590) EHR Core Research (NSF 15-509)

Cognizant Noyce POs Sandra Richardson (Program Lead) srichard@nsf.gov Kathleen Bergin (Program co-Lead) kbergin@nsf.gov Karen Keene kkeene@nsf.gov Thomas Kim tkim@nsf.gov Andrea Nixon anixon@nsf.gov Mark Pauley mpauley@nsf.gov R. Steve Turley rturley@nsf.gov Talitha Washington twashing@nsf.gov If you are interested in serving as program reviewer and not submitting a proposal in 2018, contact a cognizant PO in August.

Q & A # 3 15 minutes