An Introduction to Employment Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Religious – Belief Discrimination Awareness Training Steve Baldwin.
Advertisements

Dealing with Discrimination - background paper Please use this paper to help with the case studies 1.
Employment Law Jim Reeves Communication Workers Union 1.
IER Workplace Issues 23 March Employment Act 2008 In force 6 April 2009 repealed Statutory Dispute Resolution Procedures Overview of main changes:
NGSU Regional Councils – Oct/Nov 2014 Fair Treatment at Work Nationwide Group Staff Union.
CHAPTER 13 Unfair dismissal (2): Potentially fair reasons and the concept of reasonableness.
The Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Claudia Bennett Senior Solicitor 1.
Equality Alison Ridout. Why should I concern myself with Equality?
Chris Finlay Partner Mark Haworth Associate EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE CIPD LEICESTERSHIRE BRANCH 6 OCTOBER 2009.
Understanding Discipline in the Workplace
The termination of the Employment contract
The Equality Act 2010 & The Equality and Human Rights Commission Lynn Welsh Head of Legal 1.
Recent developments in employment law Andrew Hambler.
EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE CIPD – 26 MARCH 2009 BECKY HODGKINS AND MICHAEL BRIGGS.
An Overview of Race Discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 Institute for Employment Rights Rakesh Patel Thompsons Solicitors Congress House, London.
Overview of UK Employment Law
8 Termination of Employment (Part 1). Is it a dismissal? Resignation of the employee Mutual agreement Frustration of contract.
CHAPTER 7 Age discrimination and disability discrimination.
Occupational health and the law: What’s new? Professor Diana Kloss barrister.
Employment Law. The Employment Relationship Twofold: contractual framework with statutory overlay The basic contract: services in exchange for reward.
Equal Opportunity Law Sex and Race Discrimination
Equality Act 2010 Rahana Mohammed. Equality - History Race Relations Act 1965 Race Relations Act 1968 Race Relations Act 1976 The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry.
Equality act 2010 A quick guide in 20 slides
UNFAIR DISMISSALS ACTS 1977 – UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS THESE ACTS GIVE REDRESS FOR DISMISSALS WHICH ARE DEEMED TO BE UNFAIR.
HUMBERSIDE & SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE SENIOR OFFICER TRAINING 7 DECEMBER 2012 ‘EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL PROCEEDINGS’ BY JAMES ARNOLD BARRISTER.
The Equality Act 2010 Laura Prince. Timetable  Enacted 8 April  The Equality Act 2010 (Commencement No.4, Savings, Consequential, Transitional,
Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Claudia Bennett Senior Solicitor 1.
Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Sarah Gilzean Senior Solicitor 1.
Equality The Policy Company Limited ©. The practice of equality within the Agency: extends to all matters relating to employment, including recruitment,
Welcome Regional Network Meeting West Midlands Anti-Bullying Alliance September 2010.
Employment Law Training Course Community Matters 27 September 2008 Why employment status matters Who is my employee? Contract of employment Types of employment.
* Steve Tullock 8 th December 2011 The Equality Act 2010 What changes?
Equality Act 2010 September The legal context  There is a strong legal framework underpinning equality activity  The law covers employment and.
THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 Impact to date, key areas for consideration Paul McGowan 6 October 2011 COLLINGWOOD LEGAL Direct.
1 The Equality Act 2010 Prohibited Conduct - Direct Discrimination.
Equality Act Training For Welfare Rights Advisors.
Employment Essentials for Vocational Dental Practitioners May 2013 Derek Eccleston.
HR Practice The legal background. Introduction Why legislation is important The distinction between employees and workers Acts and Regulations.
Family Finance Workshop 26 November 2015 Work and Employment Law Aspects 26 November 2015 Work and Employment Law Aspects.
The Equality Act 2010 Catherine Casserley
Education Law The problem with trying to fit a square peg into a round hole is not that the hammering is hard work. It's that you're destroying the peg!
The Equality Act 2010 Disability Discrimination Laura Prince.
CHAPTER 15 Unfair dismissal and redundancy claims.
Parish Employment Maria Webber 8 March 2016, 10am – 1pm.
What do we mean by ‘equality’ and why is it important?
* The Equality Act 2010 What changes?. Domestics.
Equality and diversity training programme This programme is aimed at providing employers and employers with an insight on E&D legislation Andrew Wight.
University of Chester Forum for Research into Equality and Diversity Legal Update April 2016 The domestic scene Muriel Robison.
Dealing with complaints of Bullying and Harassment
“NEW ERA FOR GRIEVANCE AND DISCIPLINE?”
Equality, diversity and inclusion in work with children and young people Unit 306.
IER Employment Law Update Early Conciliation and Fees in practice
EU law against Disability Discrimination
Certificate in Human Resource Management Employment Law
Prohibited Conduct Direct Discrimination (s.13)
The Equality Act 5 years on
Handout 3: Employment legislation
Protected Characteristics
Catherine Casserley The Equality Act 2010 Catherine Casserley
Special Educational Needs and Disability
#EldersForum2018 #AgeingInCommon #NCF2018
Certificate in Human Resource Management Employment Law Session Six Disciplinary and Grievance 11/26/2018.
Equality Act 2010 Your Name.
EMPLOYMENT LAW.
Wrongful Dismissal.
Sexual Harassment: a workplace issue?
Equality.
IER Workplace Issues 17 November 2010.
Understanding Disability Discrimination A
Equality Act 2010 Your name.
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Employment Law presented by John Sprack for LawWorks

Who gets what rights? Employees - unfair dismissal, redundancy payments, written reasons for dismissal - plus all the rights which workers get Workers - right to be accompanied, national minimum wage, holiday pay, right not to have deductions from wages

Employee status: employee The test for whether someone is an employee Is there a contract with the “employer”? - see s 230(2) ERA Is there an obligation on the “employee” to provide work personally? Is there mutuality of obligation between the parties? Is there control of the “employee” by the “employer”? Do the terms of the contract as a whole reflect an employment relationship? The final point is a balanced judgment. The preceding four points are “musts”.

Employment status for discrimination Protection against discrimination is wider than for employees. The test is: Is there a contract which the person claiming protection works under? Is it to provide work or labour? Note that other groups such as agency workers are specifically included

Qualifying for unfair dismissal rights Who qualifies for the right not to be unfairly dismissed? employees only - see previous slides two years continuous employment working ordinarily in GB at the time of dismissal not in an excluded group e g armed forces, police

Time limits for unfair dismissal Claim must be presented within three months time starts to run with the effective date of termination (EDT) early conciliation - the clock stops and there is a minimum of a calendar month after it restarts before the limit expires ET has discretion if it was not reasonably practicable to present within the limit and the claim was presented within a reasonable time after the limit expired

Dismissal claimant must have been dismissed - the ways: (a) express dismissal (b) termination of a limited-term contract (c) constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal Requires a fundamental breach of contract (which includes breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence) breach must have caused resignation resignation must have been without such delay as to constitute acceptance of the breach note the effect of the last straw doctrine

Potentially fair reasons and reasonableness the employer must show a fair reason - one of the following: capability or qualifications conduct redundancy statute would be contravened by continued employment some other substantial reason (SOSR) In addition: The employer must act reasonably in deciding to dismiss for that reason

Misconduct dismissals The test in British Home Stores v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379 EAT is applied - was there: genuine belief in the misconduct based on reasonable grounds after a reasonable investigation is dismissal a sanction which is within the band of reasonable responses?

Band of reasonable responses Were the actions of the employer within the band of reasonable responses? ET must not substitute its own judgment

ACAS Code of Practice It helps to determine what is reasonable It applies to conduct dismissals, but not redundancy Follow its principles where competence or capability is in issue Relevant to whether a dismissal is unfair And breach may lead to an increase/decrease of up to 25%

Ancillary claims Right to be accompanied Right to written reasons Right to a written statement of terms and conditions

Whistleblowing Was there a qualifying disclosure? e g reasonable belief in failure to comply with a legal obligation Is it protected? - was disclosure made in accordance with ss 43C to 43H ERA 1996? Was disclosure the principal reason for dismissal? Or did it materially influence the employer in imposing a detriment A Day One right No limit to compensation

Remedies for unfair dismissal Reinstatement Re-engagement Compensation

Compensation - basic award statutory maximum per week currently £489 number of weeks pay depends on years of service 1 week per year, 1.5 weeks if over 41 at the time

Compensation - compensatory award Financial loss to date of hearing Future loss after the hearing Statutory industrial rights e g £350 Statutory cap £80,451 or 12 months wages (does not apply to whistleblowing, pregnancy dismissals)

The duty to mitigate Claimant should make reasonable efforts to mitigate loss Credit should be given for receipts in a new job And also for what claimant would be expected to receive if reasonable efforts to mitigate loss had been taken Onus is on respondent to show failure to mitigate

The Polkey principles Laid down in Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1988] AC 344 what is the effect of a finding that the employer acted unfairly, but that the adoption of a fair procedure would not have made a difference? the dismissal is still unfair but compensation may be reduced e g to reflect the percentage chance that the employee would have been dismissed anyway

Contributory conduct Was the claimant the author of his own misfortune? Conduct must be (1) blameworthy and (2) the partial cause of the dismissal deduction % depends on what is just and equitable

Recoupment If C receives jobseeker’s allowance or income related employment support allowance, Recoupment Regulations apply ET must determine the “prescribed element” And R must hold the prescribed element back until the Benefits Agency has reclaimed, then pay C the balance recoupment does not apply to a settlement

Discrimination - features no service requirement no compensation limit prospect of damaging publicity costs can be considerable

Discrimination- time limits claim must be presented within three months of the act of discrimination if the act extends over a period, time starts to run at the end of the (continuing) act subject to the clock being stopped during the early conciliation process ET has a discretion to extend time if it considers it “just and equitable” to do so

Protected characteristics age disability gender reassignment marriage and civil partnership pregnancy and maternity race religion or belief sex sexual orientation

The main forms of discrimination direct indirect victimisation harassment but somewhat different for disability - see later

Direct discrimination A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others (Equality Act 2010, s 13) “because of” need for a comparator (may be hypothetical) no material difference between claimant and the comparator (s 23)

Indirect discrimination involves application of a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) by A to B puts those with whom B shares the protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage when compared with those who do not share it puts B at that disadvantage A cannot show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

Victimisation A victimises B if he subjects B to a detriment because he has done a protected act Protected acts include doing anything in connection with the Equality Act Also making an allegation that A or another person has contravened the Act A false allegation or evidence is not protected if made in bad faith

Harassment A harasses B if A engages in unwanted conduct which is related to a relevant protected characteristic and which has the purpose or effect of violating B’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for B

Employer liability Employers are liable for the acts of employees in the course of their employment It can include unauthorised acts, and some out of work activity: CC of Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs [1991] IRLR 81 EAT Employers have a defence if they took “all reasonable steps” to avoid the discrimination Individual employees can also be held liable

Disability C is disabled if she has a physical or mental impairment which has an effect upon her ability to carry out normal day-to- day activities which is substantial long-term (think 12 months) and adverse

Forms of disability discrimination All those for other protected characteristics - see earlier slide PLUS discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments

Compensation for discrimination pecuniary loss personal injury including physical and psychiatric damage (in practice, medical evidence crucial) injury to feelings interest

Injury to feelings In calculating this head of compensation, ETs make use of the Vento bands (recently updated) top band £25,200 to £42,000 for most serious cases middle band £8,400 to £25,200 for serious cases not in the top band lower band £800 to £8,400 for less serious cases e.g. one off cases

Procedure in the ETs A separate course is needed! but note Time limits - dealt with earlier All claimants have to contact ACAS for early conciliation (during which the clock stops running) Fees are no longer payable Costs can be awarded e.g. where a case has “no reasonable prospect of success” or is conducted unreasonably Deposit can be required where a case has “little reasonable prospect of success” At the hearing procedure is less formal than a court, but quite disciplined

Contact details via website www.johnsprack.co.uk or email jmstraining@btinternet.com sign the list (legibly) with your email address if you would like to receive my newsletter if you have received my newsletter previously, do not sign