Differences between wars of old and present. By Theo Cirrito

The technology Jean-Vincent Holeindre once said, "War is one of those phenomena that have accompanied humanity since its origins." It has made and defeated empires, enriched and ruined the kingdoms, Inspired the structuring and destruction of legal, moral, and religious norms; And to contribute to the development of arts and techniques, sometimes for the better. "

Old weapons On the top: Plane In the middle: - Tank In the bottom: -Artillery

Right after the anti-tank gun : New weapons On the top : -The Rocket launchers Right after : -The anti-tank gun Right after the anti-tank gun : -The anti-tank On the bottom : -The submarine

The consequences «Wars have several consequences. Notably on the environment, the economy or on the morale or health of civilians.» Hiroshima and Nagasaki are good example of the consequences of wars In her article on the consequences of a war, Mathilde Vargas said, « The consequences of wars are not just human losses. » 

Between 1964 and 1975, the United States used a herbicidal gas which, according to UNESCO « would have destroyed the Fifth of South Vietnamese forests. » We once said, in the Geneva Protocol in 1977, "Methods and means of warfare which damage the environment in such a way as to disrupt the stability of the ecosystem are prohibited » (which means that wars must not have consequences on the ecosystem)

Mrs Vargas onc said, « What do we keep from the wars?   Direct or indirect consequences, deaths, landscapes destroyed and reduced economy»

I thank you for listening to me Zikomo kumvetsera, شكرا لإصغائكم, dinlediğiniz iz teşekkür ederim, ご静聴ありがとうございました, 경청 해 주셔서 감사합니다, 謝謝你聽, Hvala vam za slušanje, Mauruuru no te whakarongo, 谢谢你听 Audi , ٻڌڻ لاء توهان جي مهرباني, Tack för att ni lyssnade, Je vous remercie de m’avoir écouté, Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit, Hartelijk dank voor het luisteren, Muito obrigado pela atenção