Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Advertisements

Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
A Conserved Oligomerization Domain in Drosophila Bazooka/PAR-3 Is Important for Apical Localization and Epithelial Polarity  Richard Benton, Daniel St.
A Conserved Chromatin Architecture Marks and Maintains the Restricted Germ Cell Lineage in Worms and Flies  Christine E Schaner, Girish Deshpande, Paul.
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
VEGF Gene Delivery to Muscle
Stratum, a Homolog of the Human GEF Mss4, Partnered with Rab8, Controls the Basal Restriction of Basement Membrane Proteins in Epithelial Cells  Olivier.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Erika R Geisbrecht, Denise J Montell  Cell 
Gáspár Jékely, Hsin-Ho Sung, Carlos M. Luque, Pernille Rørth 
Tissue Repair through Cell Competition and Compensatory Cellular Hypertrophy in Postmitotic Epithelia  Yoichiro Tamori, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Patronin/Shot Cortical Foci Assemble the Noncentrosomal Microtubule Array that Specifies the Drosophila Anterior-Posterior Axis  Dmitry Nashchekin, Artur Ribeiro.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (June 2006)
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Juan Mata, Silvia Curado, Anne Ephrussi, Pernille Rørth  Cell 
Nicholas S. Sokol, Lynn Cooley  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Control of Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Eye by Notch Signaling
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
The Level of C/EBP Protein Is Critical for Cell Migration during Drosophila Oogenesis and Is Tightly Controlled by Regulated Degradation  Pernille Rørth,
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Border Cell Migration Analyzed Using Time- Lapse Live-Cell Imaging  Mohit Prasad, Denise J. Montell  Developmental.
Elizabeth H. Chen, Eric N. Olson  Developmental Cell 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Regulation of Invasive Cell Behavior by Taiman, a Drosophila Protein Related to AIB1, a Steroid Receptor Coactivator Amplified in Breast Cancer  Jianwu.
Karl Emanuel Busch, Jacky Hayles, Paul Nurse, Damian Brunner 
Guidance of Cell Migration by the Drosophila PDGF/VEGF Receptor
The Drosophila Homolog of C
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium  Jack Bateman, R.Srekantha Reddy,
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
The Drosophila Microtubule-Associated Protein Mini Spindles Is Required for Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Oogenesis  Woongjoon Moon, Tulle Hazelrigg  Current.
Presentation transcript:

Evidence for Tension-Based Regulation of Drosophila MAL and SRF during Invasive Cell Migration  Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell  Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 85-93 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020

Figure 1 mal-d Mutants Have Impaired F-Actin Accumulation (A) Schematic of the mal-d locus, mal-dΔ7 mutant, and MAL-D protein. The predicted MAL-D protein (1494 amino acids) is shown underneath with structural motifs indicated, as well as the amino acid changes in mal-d ems mutants. The N-terminal MAL or MKL homology domain (MHD) includes the RPEL motifs. The SAP domain (named after SAF-A/B, Acinus, and PIAS) is a putative DNA binding or chromatin association domain that is found in diverse nuclear proteins. A moderately conserved basic region is also indicated (+++). The molecular lesions in the mal-d ems mutant used for analysis are indicated in red. (B) Dorsal side of malEPg37532 homozygous fly with bent and split bristles (arrows). (C) Western blot of total ovary extract from wild-type, mal-dΔ7, and females overexpressing mal-d in some cells (slbo-Gal4/UAS-mal-d), probed with purified MAL-D antibodies. Equal amount of protein was loaded in each lane. (D) Two single-channel views of one confocal section (most basal) of the follicular epithelium covering the oocyte. In this and all subsequent images, anterior is to the left. Stage 10 egg chamber from a mal-dΔ7, FRT/ubiGFP,FRT mosaic female. Absence of GFP (green) in (D′) marks mal-d mutant cells. Scale bars, 20 μm. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 2 Border Cell Migration Is Severely Impaired in mal-d and SRF Mutants (A) Late stage 9 wild-type egg chamber. (B) Early stage 10 egg chamber from a mal-dΔ7 homozygous female. Arrows indicate the border cell clusters; arrowheads point to other follicle cells for comparison. Border cells migrate from left to right, between giant nurse cells to the oocyte. F-actin is stained by phalloidin (red); DNA (nuclei) is stained by DAPI (blue). Note the robust F-actin accumulation in wild-type migrating border cells. (C and D) Late stage 9 wild-type egg chambers from hsFLP/+;FRT,bs2R14/FRT,UbiGFP females. bs encodes SRF, and bs2R14 is an apparent null allele. In (D), all outer border cells (not the polar cells) are mutant for SRF, indicated by absence of the clonal marker GFP (green). F-actin is stained by phalloidin (red). Arrows indicate border cells. Scale bars, 20 μm. (E) Quantification of border cell migration at stage 10 in clones of border cells homozygous for the indicated mutation. In control, wild-type egg chambers, migration is complete at stage 10. Only border cell clusters in which all outer border cells are mutant were scored; n = 50 (control), 72 (mal-dΔ7), 57 (mal-dS9), 74 (mal-dF2), and 78 (bs14). The small differences between SRF and mal-dΔ7 or mal-dS9 alleles in amount of migration are not statistically significant, but mal-dF2 appears to be a hypomorphic allele. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 3 A Nuclear Form of MAL-D Has Gain-of-Function Activity (A) hsFLP/+;FRT,bs14/FRT,ubiGFP egg chamber showing SRF (bs) mutant cells (bottom) with reduced F-actin (phalloidin staining; red), next to heterozygous cells (top; positive with SRF antibody; green). SRF is nuclear and colocalizes with DAPI (blue). (B) A clone of cells overexpressing mal-d by “actin-flip-out” (top; strongly positive with MAL-D antibody due to high-level overexpression) next to wild-type cells. MAL-D (green) is detected in the cytoplasm. (C) Moderate overexpression of the activated MAL-D-ΔN in follicle cells (slbo-Gal4/UAS-mal-d-ΔN). MAL-D-ΔN (green) is predominantly nuclear. MAL-D-ΔN causes ectopic F-actin accumulation in the cytoplasm (red). In each panel, a detail of the follicular epithelium at stage 10 is shown. Images of nuclei stained by DAPI (blue) and antibody to SRF or MAL-D (green) are from the same optical section. The phalloidin images (red) are from a slightly more basal section; therefore, the overlap is not perfect. Scale bars, 10 μm. (D) Effect of MAL and of MAL-D-ΔN overexpression in border cells. Quantification migration at stage 10 (n > 100) in females carrying slbo-Gal4 and the indicated transgene. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 4 mal-d Mutant Border Cells Fragment and Produce Directionally Migrating “Cytoplasts” (A–E) Anti-β-galactosidase (green) and phalloidin (red) staining of egg chambers from slbo-flac/+;mal-dΔ7/mal-dΔ7 females, from late stage 9 (A) to stage 10A (B and C) to stage 10B (D and E). Expression of cytoplasmic β-galactosidase from the slboflac transgene (Fulga and Rørth, 2002) marks border cells strongly, visualizing cytoplasmic extensions and fragments. At later stages, other follicle cells are also stained. In these egg chambers, the border cell nuclei all remain at the anterior tip (left). Arrows indicate migrating “cytoplasts” with no nuclei. Scale bars, 40 μm. (F) Average distance and standard deviation thereof from the front of the border cell cluster (at the anterior) to the front of extension (as in [A]) or cell fragments (as in [B]–[E]). Mid-to-late stage 9 egg chambers and stage 10 egg chambers were measured. The longest intact extension measured in any sample was 55 μm; cell fragments must therefore move actively to reach the oocyte. In about half of stage 10 mal-dΔ7 egg chambers, whole border cells, including nuclei, have migrated somewhat (but did not reach the oocyte). Border cell fragments were also observed, but these egg chambers were not measured. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 5 Nuclear Accumulation of MAL-D Correlates with Shape of the Migrating Cluster Staining of wild-type stage 9 egg chambers with anti-MAL-D (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). The anti-MAL-D channel is shown separately for some panels (B′, C′, and F′). (A) The anterior third of and egg chamber for orientation. (B–F) Enlarged border cell clusters. (B) and (C) show border cells at or just after initiation of migration, respectively. The remaining panels show midmigration clusters. Anterior to the left, migration to the right (also indicated by large arrow in [A]). In (C), the thick yellow arrow marks polar cells (never positive), whereas the green arrows (white in [C′]) mark outer border cells (some positive). (G) The length of border cell clusters with or without nuclear MAL-D was measured for midmigration clusters. Indicated are average length and standard deviation thereof. Experiments 1 and 2 are different wild-type samples; three are from shg/+ females, and four are from slbo/+. Variation between experiments can be due to sample handling, such as degree of flattening. Scale bars, 20 μm (A) and 10 μm (B–F). Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 6 Nuclear Accumulation of MAL-D Induced by Pulling Border Cells into Migration Staining of egg chambers from hsFLP/+; FRT,slbo8ex2/FRT,ubiGFP females with anti-MAL-D (green) and DAPI (blue). slbo mutant cells are marked by the absence of the clonal marker GFP (red). Arrows indicate mutant border cells. (A) All border cells are slbo mutant, and the cluster does not migrate. Nuclear MAL-D staining is not observed. (B) Rear border cells are slbo mutant, front border cells are normal, and migration is in progress. Nuclear MAL-D staining observed in a slbo mutant cell. (C and D) Clusters with both wild-type and mutant border cells as in (B). In (A) and (B), late stage 9 egg chambers are shown; in (C) and (D), stage 10 egg chambers are shown. Scale bars, 20 μm. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)

Figure 7 Nuclear Accumulation of MAL-D Induced by an Activated Form of Diaphanous Both panels show border cell clusters from slbo-Gal4/+;UAS-mal-d/UAS-HA-diaCA. HA-diaCA encodes an HA-epitope-tagged, activated form of Drosophila Diaphanous (see the Experimental Procedures) and is shown in red. Anti-MAL-D staining is green and shown separately to the right. Endogenous MAL-D is not detectable under these conditions. (A) shows a cluster early after onset of expression, and only some cells express both transgenes, resulting in nuclear MAL-D (arrows). Arrowhead marks a cell only overexpressing MAL-D. (B) shows a more advanced cluster with higher levels of expression from the same sample. Border cell migration is blocked by diaCA expression. The arrow indicates cells with nuclear and cytoplasmic MAL-D. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 85-93DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.020)