ANOVA Terms — Sums of Squares

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Lecture Partitioning Evaluating the Null Hypothesis ANOVA
Advertisements

Multiple-choice question
One-Way Between Subjects ANOVA. Overview Purpose How is the Variance Analyzed? Assumptions Effect Size.
Independent Sample T-test Formula
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Some more theory and alternative problem formats. (These are problem formats more likely to appear on exams. Most of your time in.
Analysis of Variance: ANOVA. Group 1: control group/ no ind. Var. Group 2: low level of the ind. Var. Group 3: high level of the ind var.
Experimental Design & Analysis
Analysis of Variance: Inferences about 2 or More Means
Lesson #23 Analysis of Variance. In Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we have: H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k H 1 : at least one  i does not equal the others.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Statistics 101 Class 9. Overview Last class Last class Our FAVORATE 3 distributions Our FAVORATE 3 distributions The one sample Z-test The one sample.
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
ANOVA  Used to test difference of means between 3 or more groups. Assumptions: Independent samples Normal distribution Equal Variance.
Analysis of Variance & Multivariate Analysis of Variance
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.
T Test for One Sample. Why use a t test? The sampling distribution of t represents the distribution that would be obtained if a value of t were calculated.
The basic idea So far, we have been comparing two samples
Calculations of Reliability We are interested in calculating the ICC –First step: Conduct a single-factor, within-subjects (repeated measures) ANOVA –This.
Analysis of Variance or ANOVA. In ANOVA, we are interested in comparing the means of different populations (usually more than 2 populations). Since this.
64 HR (bpm) Does posture affect HR? Effects of posture lyingsittingstanding.
1 Tests with two+ groups We have examined tests of means for a single group, and for a difference if we have a matched sample (as in husbands and wives)
Review of Statistics Group Results. Which type of statistics? When comparing two group scores-Use the t-test. When comparing more than two scores: Use.
One-Way Analysis of Variance Comparing means of more than 2 independent samples 1.
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 16 – One-Factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Chapter 14 – 1 Chapter 14: Analysis of Variance Understanding Analysis of Variance The Structure of Hypothesis Testing with ANOVA Decomposition of SST.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
One-Way Analysis of Variance
One-Way ANOVA ANOVA = Analysis of Variance This is a technique used to analyze the results of an experiment when you have more than two groups.
General Linear Model 2 Intro to ANOVA.
Analysis of Variance (One Factor). ANOVA Analysis of Variance Tests whether differences exist among population means categorized by only one factor or.
Previous Lecture: Phylogenetics. Analysis of Variance This Lecture Judy Zhong Ph.D.
Chapter Seventeen. Figure 17.1 Relationship of Hypothesis Testing Related to Differences to the Previous Chapter and the Marketing Research Process Focus.
ONE WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ANOVA o It is used to investigate the effect of one factor which occurs at h levels (≥3). Example: Suppose that we wish to.
ANOVAs.  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Difference in two or more average scores in different groups  Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor);
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
Statistics for Political Science Levin and Fox Chapter Seven
Chapter 9 Introduction to the Analysis of Variance Part 1: Oct. 22, 2013.
Analysis of Variance 11/6. Comparing Several Groups Do the group means differ? Naive approach – Independent-samples t-tests of all pairs – Each test doesn't.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 4 Investigating the Difference in Scores.
 List the characteristics of the F distribution.  Conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the variances of two populations are equal.  Discuss.
The 2 nd to last topic this year!!.  ANOVA Testing is similar to a “two sample t- test except” that it compares more than two samples to one another.
Six Easy Steps for an ANOVA 1) State the hypothesis 2) Find the F-critical value 3) Calculate the F-value 4) Decision 5) Create the summary table 6) Put.
Comparing Multiple Groups:
Dependent-Samples t-Test
Chi Square Review.
SEMINAR ON ONE WAY ANOVA
Analysis of Variance -ANOVA
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Comparing Multiple Groups: Analysis of Variance ANOVA (1-way)
Post Hoc or Multiple Comparison Testing
Comparing Several Means: ANOVA
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Chi Square Review.
Introduction to ANOVA.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days.
One way ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
Chapter 13 Group Differences
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Review Questions III Compare and contrast the components of an individual score for a between-subject design (Completely Randomized Design) and a Randomized-Block.
Analysis of Variance: repeated measures
One Way ANOVA test Determine whether there are any statistically significant differences between the means of three or more independent groups.
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
Statistical Inference for the Mean: t-test
MGS 3100 Business Analysis Regression Feb 18, 2016
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

ANOVA Terms — Sums of Squares Sum of squares- proportion of variance due to group differences Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P___ Between groups 289.75 3 96.583 40.667 0.00 Within groups 38.00 16 2.375 Combined 327.75 19 S.S.—The sum of squared deviations of each data point from some mean value Between groups—The difference between S.S. combined and S.S. within groups [variability due to IV] Within groups—The total squared deviation of each point from the group mean [variability due to individual differences, measurement error…] Combined—The total squared deviation of each data point from the grand mean

ANOVA Terms — Degrees of Freedom Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P___ Between groups 289.75 3 96.583 40.667 0.00 Within groups 38.00 16 2.375 Combined 327.75 19 Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P Between groups 180 1 180 16.36 0.00 Within groups 100 9 11 Combined 280 10 d.f.—The number of cases minus some "loss" because of earlier calculations. Between groups d.f.—Equal to the total number of groups minus one. Within groups d.f.—The total number of cases minus the number of groups. Combined d.f.—Equal to the total number of cases minus one.

Degrees of freedom (df) u = number of treatments/groups v = number of replicates. Source of variance Sum of squares (S of S) Degrees of freedom (df) Mean square = S of S / df Between treatments *** u - 1 [2] Residual u(v-1) [6] Total (uv)-1 [8]   The total df is always one fewer than the total number of data entries] Assume that we have recorded the biomass of 3 bacteria in flasks of glucose broth, and we used 3 replicate flasks for each bacterium For u treatments (3 in our case) and v replicates (3 in our case); the total df is one fewer than the total number of data values in the table (9 values in our case)

ANOVA Terms — Mean Squares & F-Ratio Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P___ Between groups 289.75 3 96.583 40.667 0.00 Within groups 38.00 16 2.375 Combined 327.75 19 Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P Between groups 180 1 180 16.36 0.00 Within groups 100 9 11 Combined 280 10 M.S. (the variance)—the sums of squares divided by the degrees of freedom F—the ratio of mean squares between groups to the mean squares within groups.

ANOVA Terms — Mean Squares & F-Ratio Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F P___ Between groups 289.75 3 96.583 40.667 0.00 Within groups 38.00 16 2.375 Combined 327.75 19 P value compares the calculated F to a critical value of F Critical Value of F3,16 = 3.24 Our F-value of 40.667 exceeds 3.24 so we reject the null hypothesis and indicate that the data supports there are differences in our DV by the IV groups- but we can’t tell which group better

Fill in the blank on the ANOVA Table Source S.S. d.f. M.S. F Between groups 80 4 20.0 Within groups 90 45 2.0 Combined 170 49 How many groups are being compared in the above example? How many subjects are in the sample? What is the F-ratio?

Examples: One-Way ANOVA

Mean (SD) Confidence Score Depression Level N Mean (SD) Confidence Score F-Ratio and p-value Rarely 356 68.89(10.05) F = 111.46 (p=.001) Sometimes 266 58.22(10.83) Often 47 46.23(12.50) Research Question: Is there a difference in confidence scores among those who are rarely, sometimes or often in a depressed state of mind? Null hypothesis: Confidence would be similar regardless of depression level Interpretation: We see the mean confidence scores vary from 46 among those with odepression often to 69 for those who rarely have depression. There is a statistically significant difference in overall confidence score between depression groups F(3, 676) = 111.46, p <.001.

Mean (SD) Job Satisfaction Score Nursing Staff N Mean (SD) Job Satisfaction Score F-Ratio and p-value RN 20 45.0(3.95) F = 13.23 (p=.001) LPN 41.7(5.79) UAP 36.2(6.37) Research question: Are different nursing staff less satisfied with their job? Null hypothesis: Job satisfaction would be comparable for all nurse staff. Interpretation: We see that the mean job satisfaction score for the RN group is 45.0 (SD 3.95), the LPN group is 41.7 (SD 5.79) and the UAP group is 36.2 (SD 6.37). The next value is the F-ratio which is 13.23 and the p-value corresponding to the F-ratio is .001. Since the p-value is <.05 (p=.001) we can reject the null hypothesis.