The Analysis of Soils and Waters in Accordance with U. S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiochemical Methods and Data Evaluation
Advertisements

Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Primary Standards Is a highly purified compound that serves as a reference material in all volumetric and titrimetric methods. It must be: –1) Highly pure,
Instrumental Analysis
UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
Samples that make labs shudder Carl M Smits Technical Director, Evergreen Analytical Laboratory, Inc.
1 Method Selection and Development l Initial Considerations n What does the method need to do? 3 What analyte/s need to be assayed? 3 What range or concentration.
Mentoring Session Technical Assistance Committee Method Modifications.
An Introduction to Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) Steve Badger and Charity Wessel.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
Parameters Nitrate + Nitrite (NO 23 F) Nitrite (NO 2 F) Total Dissolved Nitrogen (TDN) Orthophosphate (PO 4 F) Total Dissolved Phosphate (TDP) Particulate.
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry or ICP-MS
Result validation. Exercise 1 You’ve done an analysis to the best of your ability using the correct procedure. Is your answer correct? possibly, hopefully.
QA/QC Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Associated with EPA Method 1631 Chuck Wibby Wibby Environmental Seminar on Low Level Mercury Data and Analyses.
© 2009 Perkin Elmer As Speciation in Apple Juice Charles Schneider, Presenter Kenneth Neubauer, Co-Author PerkinElmer.
X Ray Flouresence Analysis (XRF). XRF X-Ray Fluorescence is used to identify and measure the concentration of elements in a sample X-Ray Fluorescence.
Titremetric analysis Dr. Mohammad Khanfar. Concept of Titremetric analysis In general, we utilize certain property of a substance to be analyzed in order.
Detect Limits as Representation for a Standard VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi Risk Assessor, DERR, Central Office VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT Unit 4: Module 13, Lecture 2.
CALIBRATION METHODS.
Method Comparison A method comparison is done when: A lab is considering performing an assay they have not performed previously or Performing an assay.
Quality Control In Measurements Tom Colella CLAS Goldwater Environmental Lab.
Materials Characterization Lab Elemental Analyses by ICP-AES Henry Gong, Senior Analytical Chemist September 10, 2008.
Field Analysis Quality Control
The determination of lead by MD-HG-AFS in APMP*-QM-P3 comparison Lu Xiaohua, Lu Hai, Ma Liandi, Cui Yanjie National Research Center for Certified Reference.
1 Spectroscopic Analysis Part 1 – Introduction Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand January 2012 Dr Ron Beckett Water Studies Centre School of Chemistry.
in tin pest and pest free Monika Leodolter-Dvorak and Ilse Steffan
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry Dr M. Abd-Elhakeem Faculty of Biotechnology General Chemistry Lecture 7.
A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek – Applications Chemist.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
ICP MAKING STANDARDS. NUMBER OF STANDARDS Determine the number of standards necessary for your measurements (Blank, 100ppb, 500ppb, 1000ppb, etc)
CALIBRATION METHODS. For many analytical techniques, we need to evaluate the response of the unknown sample against the responses of a set of standards.
Data Analysis and Presentation Chapter 5- Calibration Methods and Quality Assurance EXCEL – How To Do 1- least squares and linear calibration curve/function.
Advanced Analytical Chemistry – CHM 6157® Y. CAIFlorida International University Updated on 9/26/2006Chapter 3ICPMS Interference equations Isobaric.
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
1 Chapter 2 Steps in a chemical analysis Plan of analysis Before doing any quantitative analysis, the following questions should be answered: 1-
Is Your Analytical Result Accurate? Presented By: James S. Smith, Ph.D. Trillium, Inc. GSA North-Central Section 39 th Annual Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Primary Standards Is a highly purified compound that serves as a reference material in all volumetric and titrimetric methods. It must be: –1) Highly pure,
Copyright © 2015, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 EPAs New MDL Procedure What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply Richard Burrows.
Chapter 1: The Nature of Analytical Chemistry
Green Power Tools: Assessment Tools to Support Green Remediation Goals April 5,
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and
Multi-Analyte LC-MS/MS Methods – Best Practice.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
An in-depth look at trace metallic impurity determination by ICP-OES
An integrated GC-MS workflow solution for the determination of (semi)volatiles in drinking water and solid waste according to the U.S. EPA guidelines B.
The XRF determination of sulphur in iron oxide.
The 2015/2016 TNI Standard and the EPA MDL Update
Serpil KILIÇ, Murat KILIÇ
Eric Burgstrom, Rebecca Haley, Keaton Nahan, Dr. James Mack and Dr
EPA Method Equivalency
Zhifeng Zhang Division of Marine Environmental Chemistry
Janice L. Willey Senior Chemist
Strategies for Eliminating Interferences in Optical Emission Spectroscopy Best practices to optimize your method and correct for interferences to produce.
iCAP OES Analysis of Trace Elements in Hair
524.3 Purge Flow Study Anne Jurek – Sr. Applications Chemist
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Ultimate Clean Digestion Cups and Clean Lab Testing
EPA Method Equivalency
ICP-MS ICP – Inductively Coupled Plasma MS – Mass Spectrometry
What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
Quantifying the Efficiency of Different Solid Sample Digestion Methods: A Comparison of Time, Cost, and Accuracy Connie Hayes.
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Atomic absorption spectroscopy is based on the same principle as the flame test used in qualitative analysis.
Introduction To Medical Technology
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
Presentation transcript:

The Analysis of Soils and Waters in Accordance with U. S The Analysis of Soils and Waters in Accordance with U.S. EPA Method 6020B using the NexION® 2000 ICP-MS Anthony Palermo

Introduction Liquid and soil wastes enter the environment Quantity and diversity of wastes increasing Contaminate soils and waters U.S. EPA Method 6020 developed to address contaminated soils and waters Updated several times throughout the years Applies to both waters and soils Latest iteration is 6020B, which includes New elements – 23 in total New detection limit criteria New QC criteria

Elements B, Mo: Not part of 6020B; analyzed for “information only” Pb: Sum Pb206 + Pb207 + Pb 208 isotopes

Why Sum the Pb Isotopes? Pb occurs naturally with 4 isotopes: Other elements undergo radioactive decay and turn into Pb Th 232  Pb 208  Decay time = 1.4 billion years U 235  Pb 207 U 238  Pb 206 For highest accuracy, the Pb isotopes must be summed Pb Isotope Natural Abundance 204 1.4% 206 22.4% 207 22.1% 208 52.4% Decay Time = 4.46 billion years

Calibration Standards Every 20 Samples: MB, LCS, MS, MSD Daily Work Flow Daily Optimizations Calibration Standards Initial QC Checks ICB, ICV, LLOQ, SIC Samples Soils & Waters Periodic QC Checks Every 10 Samples: CCB, CCV Every 20 Samples: MB, LCS, MS, MSD Final QC Checks CCB, CCV Confirm instrument is performing as expected Establish Calibration Curves Verify calibration curve Establish performance for methodology Run Samples QC verifies instrument performance during analysis & sample preparation Verifies instrument performance

Samples & Sample Preparation Water & soil reference materials NIST 1640a Trace Elements in Natural Water HPS Soil Solution B HPS River Sediment B Sample Preparation Waters: Acidified to 2% HNO3 + 1% HCl Soils: 10x dilution with 2% HNO3+ 1% HCl 200 ppb Au added to aid with Hg washout

A Word on Soil Reference Materials Solid soil reference materials exist For example NIST 2711a Montana II Soil The analytical results depend on sample preparation Since soils contain Si, complete digestion requires HF EPA methods for leaching soils, without the use of HF Silicates not dissolved  not total metals Various sample preparation methods available HCl (mL) HNO3 (mL) 10 3 9 Will give different results

A Word on Soil Reference Materials NIST 2711 Montana II Soil as an example Drying Samples Recommended at 110°C for 2 hours But don’t dry for volatile elements (i.e. As, Hg, Se) Need to correct for moisture content Total Results Many from solid-sampling techniques (i.e. XRF, INAA, etc.) Analyses done by NIST and USGS Leach Results Determined with ICP-OES and Method 3050b (hot plate digestion) 6 commercial labs % Recoveries relative to total composition: 1.5% (Na) to 100% (Hg) What is the correct, accepted concentration in solid soil reference materials?

Calibration Standards Prepared in 2% HNO3 + 1% HCl 200 ppb Au added to aid with Hg washout External calibration curves – linear through zero

Instrumental Conditions: NexION® 2000 ICP-MS All elements measured in Collision mode Increases confidence in results when matrices & interferences can vary from sample to sample

Instrumental Conditions: NexION® 2000 ICP-MS On-line aerosol dilution Decreases matrix suppression Set to 2.5x Neb Argon AMS Argon Sample Uptake Drain Primary Aerosol Diluted Aerosol to Plasma

Instrumental Conditions: NexION® 2000 ICP-MS 7-port switching valve with 1 mL sample loop Increases sample throughput Minimizes sample uptake and washout On-line addition of internal standards through switching valve Increased productivity Less chance of error Enhanced mixing

Results: Reference Materials Blue = waters Shades of Violet = soils All elements not present in all CRMs All Recoveries within 10% of Certified Values Accuracy Established

Results: Stability – CCV 8 hour analysis of soil samples Calibration check standard analyzed every 10 samples No recalibration, no extra rinsing Variations within + 10% over 8 hours Stability Established

Results: Stability – Internal Standards 8 hour analysis of soil samples Monitor internal standard intensities for all samples Recoveries relative to calibration blank Well within method-defined criteria over 8 hours Stability Established

Results: MDLs & LLOQs Method Detection Limits 7 replicate measurements of a blank Multiply standard deviation by 3.14 Lower Limit of Quantitation Lowest concentration standard that can be read within 35% of its true value against the calibration curve

Results: MDLs & LLOQs

Summary Criteria of U.S. EPA Method 6020B met Accuracy Stability Matrix effects Same methodology applied to both waters and soils Everything run in Collision mode More confidence in results as samples can vary significantly