Data Analysis in Particle Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reactive and Potential Field Planners
Advertisements

From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 1 iCSC2014, Tyler Dorland, DESY From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 Beauty Physics, Tracking,
A New Approach to Cluster Finding and Hit Reconstruction in Cathode Pad Chambers and its Development for the Forward Muon Spectrometer of ALICE A.Zinchenko,
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
8. Statistical tests 8.1 Hypotheses K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10 Frequent problem: Decision making based on statistical information.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
David Adams ATLAS DIAL Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL March 25, 2003 CHEP 2003 Data Analysis Environment and Visualization.
MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
CMS Masterclass It’s the dawn of an exciting age of new discovery in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC and its experiments are tuning up. CMS –
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
The Hidden Beauty of Bubble Chambers. Activity 1: What do you see? What questions would you like answered about this picture?
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
The ATLAS detector. High energy particle physics Typical detector layout Tracking chamber ElectroMagnetic calorimeter Hadronic calorimeter Muon chamber.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Top mass error predictions with variable JES for projected luminosities Joshua Qualls Centre College Mentor: Michael Wang.
Lecture 8 Source detection NASSP Masters 5003S - Computational Astronomy
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
ATLAS Z-Path Masterclass Masterclass Analysis Intro.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
Z & W Boson Reconstruction with Monte Carlo Simulations and ATLAS DATA Adam Lowery Supervisor: Dr. Jonas Strandberg Wednesday, August 11, 2010.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Jet variables Presented by Kaifu Lam Mar 1, 2017.
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Muon stopping target optimization
B Decays with Invisibles in the Final State
(2001) Data Filtering: UPDATE
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
In search of K+K- molecule
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
ATLAS Z-Path Masterclass 2011
A brief update on b-tagging of High P jets
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

Data Analysis in Particle Physics December 1, 2010 Timothy Harrington-Taber

Data Analysis in Particle Physics Historical Review What we get from the detector Pre-processing of data Cutting and fitting Monte Carlo simulations

History of Particle Data Analysis Essentially limited by detectors Manual count of scintillator hits (early 1900’s) Cloud chamber (1930’s) Bubble chamber (1950’s)

Particle Track Tracing Bubble and cloud chambers provided excellent information about the path of the particle, but the photographs typically had to be manually examined to obtain physical information about ionizing particles. Time-consuming to analyze and produce

Directly Available Information At the fundamental level, detectors provide information about where particles were found when. Momentum, energy, charge, etc. are usually derived based on “reading” these measurements based on our knowledge of the detector

Event Reconstruction Detector hits are reconstructed into tracks that best explain the pattern observed Sometimes, one particle is reconstructed as two separate tracks… or two particles are reconstructed as only one track Energy, momentum, and charge associated with the track is recorded, along with track length and position of origin

Data Profile With the charge, momentum, energy and decay length of the track, the reconstruction software can determine the likelihood of the track being caused by a specific particle Other information available includes the number of hits assigned to the track in a given detector, its isolation from other tracks, and missing energy/momentum in the collision

Analyzing Data No longer done by hand Specialized computer software filters and analyzes events for patterns of interest ROOT Data Analysis Framework is described as a set of object-oriented frameworks, usable within C++, optimized for particle physics work

Example of using ROOT Declare the process of interest (decay of B-meson to J/ψ ππK with J/ψ decaying to two muons) Run script to filter those reconstructed particles matching this pattern to make available a smaller file containing only events roughly matching criteria

Cutting and Fitting Not all events that pass a filter will be the process or particle intended Leaving out certain events based on values of particular parameters (cutting) allows for better identification of the particle/decay in question Typically, the cut data can be fit to a “signal” distribution and a “background” distribution

Fitting Procedure Most often, data is plotted as a histogram with the number of counts per bin on the vertical axis and the relevant variable on the horizontal (e.g. Energy or Momentum) ROOT can be used to determine background and signal fits, giving numbers of events to each distribution included in the fit 3σ signifies “evidence”, 5σ is a “discovery”

Significance Another measure of the strength of the signal is known as the significance This measures the amount of signal S to the amount of background B Significance Integrated over the region near the peak of the signal

Example (continued) This file will still probably be too large to use reasonably Apply preliminary cuts, and filter data to only include parameters that might be used in the optimization process Note: leaving out a parameter will require repeating this step if later optimization requires its use

Optimization of Fit Parameters Set up a script that will step through several values of a particular cut (leaving others fixed) and return the significance for each value Repeat for other optimization parameters Adjust fixed values of optimization parameters based on previous round of analysis (plotting data now is a good idea as a check) Repeat until no longer able to improve significance

Understanding the data Certain processes other than those directly studied may pass the cuts used Measured values from previous experiment may be used to predict parameters that we expect to observe, or to provide expected cross-sections based on particular unknowns present in the data

Monte Carlo Analysis One of the strongest tools in determining likely detector response to physical processes is to perform a Monte Carlo simulation A Monte Carlo simulation randomly and repeatedly selects parameters from a specified domain and uses them to create its results

Monte Carlo in Particle Physics In particle physics, a decay particle and decay mode are specified Angular distribution and subsequent decays are determined randomly within specified boundaries Interaction with the detector is also treated randomly (where the process is random), and the reconstruction algorithm is applied

Monte Carlo Usage The Monte Carlo model of the process can be compared to the data obtained Most detectors have existing Monte Carlo simulations of “background” events of various kinds to assist in the measurement of cross-section of a particular process

Data Analysis History Types of Data Obtainable Event Reconstruction Cutting and Fitting Brief Overview of Monte Carlo methods