Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feasibility study of measurement of Higgs pair creation in a gamma-gamma collider Shin-ichi Kawada Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University LCWS11.
Advertisements

Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Impact of Tracker Design on Higgs/SUSY Measurement Hai-Jun Yang, Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor SiD Benchmarking Meeting September 19, 2006.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Higgs Detection Sensitivity from GGF H  WW Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ATLAS Higgs Meeting October 3, 2008.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e  e   H 0 Z 0       X Analysis Hai-Jun Yang & Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor SiD Benchmarking.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
LCWS2013 Higgs Recoil Mass Study at 350 GeV Apr 27, 2014 Jacqueline Yan Komamiya Lab, Univ. of Tokyo 富山 12013/07/20.
J. KalinowskiInvisible sneutrino Pinning down the invisible sneutrino at the ILC Jan Kalinowski U Warsaw.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,,
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Summary of MC requests for DBD benchmarks ILD Workshop, Kyushu University May 23,
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
SiD Full MC Samples E.Devetak, A.Nomerotski 26 Aug 2008.
Shawn Hayes Cohorts: Tianqi Tang, Molly Herman Higgs Analysis for CLIC at 380 GeV simulations.
Higgs Summary Alexei Raspereza On behalf of Higgs Working Group ECFA Workshop, Warsaw 12/06/2006 Outline  Current Status  Contributions in Warsaw  Theory.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
10-Jun-161 LHCb MC data analysis  3µ Rare decays WG N.Sagidova Present limit : BR(  3µ) > 4·10 -8 Is it possible to improve this limit in LHCb ? How.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Taikan Suehara et al., Tokyo, 12 Nov page 1 Taikan Suehara (Kyushu) A. Miyamoto (KEK), T. Tomita (Kyushu) Higgs recoil mass analysis: status.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Higgs Recoil Mass Measurement and ZH Cross Section Tim Barklow, Awatif Belymam SLAC Feb 24, 2009.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Higgs branching ratios study for DBD ILC physics WG general meeting Jan H. Ono (NDU) Jan ILC physics WG general meeting 1.
Standard Monte Carlo Event Samples Norman Graf SLAC November 11, 2004.
Satish Desai - 20 July Resonant Higgs Searches at DØ Satish Desai -- Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration 20 July 2007 European Physical Society.
Michael Carrigan Advisors: Kevin Black & Lidia Dell’Asta
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs Self-coupling Status and Prospects
Manqi Ruan Discussing & Support: Francois, Roman, Vincent,
Status of ECAL Optimization Study
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
BSM search using Higgs to invisible decay at the ILC
Higgs Physics at a gg Collider
LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China, March 2010
SM-like Higgs searches
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Measurement of
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Tim Scanlon Imperial College, London on behalf of the DØ Collaboration
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X Analysis Hai-Jun Yang & Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ALCPG Workshop at Fermilab October 22-26, 2007

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Physics Motivation To determine a suitable ILC SiD tracker momentum resolution capable of making a direct measurement of e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X Small BR H  m+m- 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Cross Section of HZ  m+m X 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

MC Generator & Analysis Tool  e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X Based on ILC350 beam setup Polarization of e- is -85%, e+ is 0 PandoraV2.3 (modified for H m+m- decay, thanks to Michael E. Peskin) and PythiaV3.3 Java Analysis Studio V2.2.5 SDMar01, Fast MC Simulation and 1000 fb-1 Track momentum resolution for SDMar01 D(1/pt) =  (2*10-5)2 + (7*10-4/pt/sinq)2 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Monte Carlo Samples Signal – 10K: e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X MH=100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150 GeV Cross sections are 51, 46, 38, 27, 16, 7 ab, respectively. Expected counts are 51, 46, 38, 27, 16, 7 for 1000 fb-1 Background e+e-  Z0Z0  m+m-X – 100 K, 31.6 fb Background e+e-  W+W-  m+m-nn – 400 K, 149.68 fb Background e+e-  Z/g  m+m- - 500K, 2574.0 fb Background e+e-  Zg m+m- g - 400K, 416.3 fb Background e+e-  ZH m+m- H 10K events for each Higgs mass point 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Preselection Cuts “Good” m: a) Pm > 20 GeV b) |cos Qm | < 0.8 At least 2 “Good” m Eff_signal ~ 62.4% – 65% 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Selection Cuts (MH=100 GeV) Opening angle between two m Polar angle of two m 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Selection Cuts (MH=120 GeV) Opening angle between two m Polar angle of two m 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Selection Efficiency Lower efficiency for higher Higgs mass, which is mainly caused by wider opening angle between mm decay from Higgs. 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Mmm vs Track Momentum Resolution MH=100 GeV MH=120 GeV 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Signal Events - Detection Significance  Optimize Higgs significance for each Higgs mass point.  The Hmm significance is improved with better track resolution. 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Branching Ratio Uncertainty The detection significance improves significantly with improved momentum resolution, but branching ratio of Hmm improves only modestly. 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Higgs Mass Resolution 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Higgs Mass Resolution 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update Higgs Mass Resolution Better Higgs mass resolution with better track resolution. 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update

Preliminary Conclusions The SD tracker with nominal track momentum resolution makes it possible but still hard to measure e+e-H0Z0  m+m- X. But the direct measurement is feasible (>5 sigma for light Higgs mass ~ 100-140GeV) if the track momentum resolution is improved by a factor of ~ 2 or more. 10/25/2007 H.J. Yang - H-->mumu update