600 MHz – Proposed TV Transition Objectives and Methodology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BR/TSD Москва 2004 Workshop for CEE, CIS and Baltic States BCD Planning Principles and Approaches Сентябрь 2004 Москва David Botha.
Advertisements

BR/TSD Dakar 2005 Workshop for the African Group of Countries BCD Planning Principles and Approaches 25 – 29 April 2005 Dakar David Botha.
Study on Digital Switchover Plan in SATRC Countries 2 nd SATRC Spectrum WG Meeting March, 2014 Tehran, I.R.Iran Rumana Haque Bangladesh Telecommunication.
1 Broadcaster Relocation Fund Workshop Expanded Presentation June 25, 2012 Presented by: Jay Adrick, Vice President Broadcast Technology.
- 1 - RSPG Opinion on Digital Dividend Mike Byrne Commissioner - ComReg, Ireland Vice - Chair (elect) of RSPG and Chairman of the Working Group on the.
Frequency Co-ordination -for what? The Agreement Frequency Co-ordination -Advantages Frequency Co-ordination -Disadvantages The Procedure Administrative.
2014 Work Planning Local Program Leadership Team.
SSC Page 1 Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company.
© M2Z Networks Inc. All rights reserved. Advances in Wireless Technology and Impacts on Broadband Deployment National Broadband Policy Workshop August.
Wireless Broadband Service in Rural America Rural TeleCon ‘06 October 24, 2006 Paul D’Ari Spectrum Competition and Policy Division Federal Communications.
Doc.: IEEE /0023r1 Submission March 2010 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 Ofcom 600 MHz Consultation Questions Date: Authors:
A View from the FCC’s Office of Engineering & Technology NSMA Spectrum 2008 May 21, 2008 Julius P. Knapp Chief Office of Engineering and Technology Federal.
APCO Western Regional Long Beach, CA March 1, MHz Issues Robert Gurss APCO Director of Legal & Government Affairs (202) ,
Overview of Service Rules: Technical Issues Phase II 220 MHz Service (Auction No. 72) Gary Devlin Engineer, Mobility Division Wireless.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
CSMAC Spectrum Sharing Sub- Committee Discussion Materials March 2012.
Doc.: 18-12/108r0 Submission October 26, 2012 Slide 1 FCC TV Band Incentive Auction: Impact on Unlicensed Operation Notice: This document has been prepared.
Overview of Service Rules and Due Diligence Keith Harper Electronics Engineer Mobility Division, WTB March 7, 2007 BROADBAND PCS Auction No. 71 Seminar.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) 17 th Madrid Forum 14 January 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
©Ofcom Business Radio Reform Trading, Liberalisation and Simplification 22 November 2007 Paul Jarvis Business Radio 07.
©Ofcom Spectrum reform in the UK: The development of Spectrum Usage Rights Professor William Webb 2006.
Structuring Species Closures that Work for Fishermen Kate Quigley Council Economist Ad Hoc Committee on Socio-Economic Impact of Yearly Closures July 24,
NSMA Working Group Conference Report Larrie Sutliff, Chair NSMA Spectrum Management /16/2012.
SM Sec.1 Dated 13/11/10 STRATEGY & STRUCTURE Group 3.
Panel on Methodology for Repacking Members: Lynn ClaudyWilliam Meintel Bruce Franca James Ocon Mel Frerking Joseph Snelson Ira GoldstoneByron St. Clair.
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) 600 MHz Repurposing RABC 600 MHz Working Group Meeting Innovation, Science and Economic Development.
Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless Microphone Operations.
Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz For Mobile Radio Services ‘5G’…
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
Gemserv1 Release Management Enduring Releases. Release Management  SEC defines Release Management as the process adopted for planning, scheduling and.
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
From Question to Action: Creating In-House Surveys as a part of Data Driven informed Decision Making David Consiglio EDUCAUSE Connect april 22, 2015.
Framework for CSO Control Planning
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
myTimetable Module Timetable Academic Review Session
Guide for setting up Framework Agreements
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
Regional Connectivity Scheme Ministry of Civil Aviation
2011 Prioritization Update to Market Subcommittees
Parks and Recreation Commission
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Endangered Species Act Listing Program
Designing Adaptive Organizations
700 MHz Narrowband Channel Relocation Plan
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (GE 404)
Incentive Auction Transition APTS Public Media Summit
Designing Adaptive Organizations
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
NPA 306/639 (Area Code) Relief in Saskatchewan
Project Management Process Groups
ARCH 435 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
NPA 450/579 (Area Code) Relief in Quebec
Rule 21 Working Group 2 IN-PERSON WORKSHOP August 29, 2018
Approach to Market Cutover - Draft for Discussion
NPA 403/587/780/825 (Area Code) Relief in Alberta
LTSEC Auction Timetable
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
County Wide Safety Program
IEEE Regulatory SC Vancouver DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda
Plan to Rescan TV Stations Are Moving Frequencies
Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now The Resource Problem Resources and Priorities Project network times are a schedule until resources have been assigned.
Combine Licensing of 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz Band
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Capacity Access Review
The Chief Operator Overview of requirements and duties.
Discussion on The EHT Timeline and PAR Definition
Multi-AP backhaul analysis
Presentation transcript:

600 MHz – Proposed TV Transition Objectives and Methodology RABC 600 MHz Working Group Meeting September 30, 2016 Building a prosperous and innovative Canada

Agenda Introduction Overarching Objectives and Approach Proposed Transition Plan Dependencies and Daisy Chains Assigning Stations to Phases Rules and Objectives Phases and Schedule Comments and Next steps

Introduction Canada and the U.S. are jointly repurposing the 600 MHz band, repacking existing OTA TV stations more tightly in lower frequencies. The upper portion will be repurposed for commercial mobile service. All regular power and virtually all low power existing Canadian TV stations will have a channel following the repacking. A new joint allotment plan will identify the new channel assignments for all Canadian and U.S. stations while a joint transition plan will address the scheduling of station moves.

Where are we in the overall process? ISED decision on 600 MHz repurposing: August 2015 Joint ISED/FCC framework guiding repurposing process: August 2015 Start of the incentive auction: March 29, 2016 Launch of the RABC 600 MHz working group: April 2016 Information gathering related to the Canadian transition Draft framework to govern the transition: September 30, 2016 Draft certificate application process Draft post-transition rules and framework End of incentive auction (2016 or 2017?) New joint DTV allotment plan, transition plan and schedule Beginning of transition

Timelines Possible Stages

Overarching Objectives Orderly and manageable transition Continue broadcasting throughout without undue interference Maximize time for Canadian broadcasters to transition while ensuring a timely transition Efficiently manage limited resources (e.g. tower crews, manufacturing and equipment delivery) Minimizing impact to viewers Limited number of rescans required Flexibility to take into account unforeseen issues that may arise during the transition

Proposed Transition Approach Phase-based Regional/market-based Station priority: Which move first? Canadian stations impeding U.S. station transition Canadian stations operating in the “TV band” with dependencies Canadian stations operating in the “mobile” band Canadian stations with no dependencies Temporary technical rules during the transition Restrict use of temporary channels, unless necessary Timely application process

Station Dependencies & Daisy Chains During the transition there is potential for interference Stations operating on their original channels and stations on-air testing or operating on their new channels Multiple station dependencies form a daisy chain Daisy chains can also be quite complex Can consist of 100s of stations, spanning Canada into U.S. For the transition, need to break daisy chains: Assign stations to transition during different time periods Assign stations to operate on temporary channels Allow temporary increases in interference

Transition Plan: Phases Assigning each station to a phase Optimization techniques based on rules and objectives All assignments must satisfy each rule, then best fit applied to objectives Minimizes dependencies created by interference issues, ensures broadcasters time to transition and groups stations within a market into the same phase to manage limited resources and minimize impact on viewers Scheduling of phases Estimates total time for stations within a phase to complete their transition by modelling transition activities and accounting for limited resources Phases will have sequential on-air testing periods and end dates

Number of Phases Limiting the number of transition phases Allows for stations within the same region to transition at the same time Limits the need for multiple channel rescans by viewers Facilitates monitoring of the transition process FCC proposing 10 phases, completed within 39 months ISED proposing to extend transition beyond 39 months Canadian stations not impeding the transition of U.S. stations to be scheduled in later phases

Assignment of Stations to Phases No Canadian stations will be assigned to transition before Phase 3 Canadian TV stations not scheduled to transition earlier than 18 months Canadian stations not impacting the transition of U.S. stations scheduled for later phases Stations with Canadian only or no dependencies Stations without dependencies can continue to operate on their current channel/parameters provided no interference is caused to other stations during or after the transition

Assignment of Stations to Phases All stations within a region will be assigned to no more than two phases Allows for stations within the same region to transition at the same time; clusters stations based on geographic area Limits the need for multiple channel rescans by viewers Manages limited resources; tower crews can concentrate their work on specific area

Assignment of Stations to Phases Difference between the number of stations transitioning in each phase is limited to 30 Balances and assigns stations evenly among phases Manages limited resources; spreads resources evenly among the phases No phase to exceed 125 station dependencies / dependency difference limited between phases Limits the amount of coordination required during on-air testing, making for a more manageable on-air testing process for broadcasters Minimizes maximum size of daisy chains within phase

Temporary Transition Rules Station cannot cause more than 2% additional interference to another station Allows flexibility for stations to conduct on-air testing while limiting interference during the transition Coordination may not always be practical for complex daisy chains Reduces number and complexity of station dependencies Higher interference levels would reduce further, but 2% balances limiting dependencies and causing greater interference Reduces number of channel rescans

Minimizing the Amount of Work No use of temporary channels, unless necessary Use of temporary channels means more moves: first move to the temporary channel and then to the final channel May create confusion for viewers and additional rescans May require additional equipment, further limiting resources May be considered on ad-hoc basis

Station Assignment Objectives Maximize time for Canadian broadcasters to transition their stations Limit Canadian and U.S. stations competing for limited resources throughout the transition Canadian TV stations will be afforded at least 18 months to transition Assign U.S. stations in “mobile” band to earlier phases; clear U.S. “mobile” band first Mobile auction completed

Station Assignment Objectives Minimize number of rescans per market/region Minimize total number of linked stations (daisy chains) Throughout all phases of the transition Provide as many stations as possible with the ability to conduct on-air tests while broadcasting on their original channel without the need to coordinate Minimize difference between number of stations in the largest and smallest phases Balancing the number of stations in each phase will more efficiently manage limited resources Spread out evenly across phases

Length of Phases Time for all stations within a phase to complete the work Modelling of limited resources based on availability, capacity Extended transition period for Canadian stations not impeding U.S. station ability to transition * * * Month 0 Month 12 Month 24 Month 36 * Transition period extended for Canadian stations

Station Transition Activities Phase duration takes into account the complexity and scope of work: Planning Engineering design Structural tower analysis Permits (e.g. lease, zoning, land-use authority) Equipment acquisition Coordination of broadcasters within same market Tower modifications and antenna installation Calibration of equipment and testing Some activities may occur in parallel, others not Pre-construction Construction

Pre-construction Manufacturing and equipment delivery Some stations may be able to receive antennas without waiting, others wait in queue (simulations) Directional antennas: 24 weeks for delivery Omni-directional antennas: 12 weeks for delivery Capacity: 80–88/month All other activities (planning) Complicated stations: 72 weeks DTV stations: 32 weeks LPTV stations: 24 weeks Maximum completion time for pre-construction is the greater of “manufacturing and equipment delivery” or “all other activities”

Construction Tower work: Number and availability of tower crews (equipment installation on the tower) Some may schedule tower crews to work on their stations without waiting, others wait in queue (simulations) Tower height (10–40 days): base time Antenna related (adjustment on base time) Canadian tower crews: 22; U.S. tower crews: 51–57 All other construction work (combiners, on-air tests) Complicated stations: 32 weeks DTV stations: 24 weeks LPTV stations: 12 weeks Maximum completion time for construction is the greater of “tower work” or “all other construction work”

Other Proposed Considerations Account for stations occupying same tower (in phase) Total “tower work” time can be reduced Stations can take advantage of using the same tower crew at the same time for antenna installations Time for most difficult station + 10% for 2nd station + 5% for each additional station up to 30% Auxiliary antenna use Additional week added to tower crew work for stations needing auxiliary antenna Minimum on-air testing period of 4 weeks Sequential testing periods; stations in a phase cannot start testing prior to completion of previous phase

Overall Transition Plan Timing Month 0 Month 12 Month 24 Month 36

Comments and Timing ISED invites comments on the proposed transition plan Comments on the methodology for assigning stations to phases, including proposed rules and objectives Comments on the methodology for establishing a transition schedule and the proposed inputs (pre-construction and construction) Comments kindly requested by November 11, 2016

Next Steps Continue RABC 600 MHz working group meetings: Written input and comments on the proposed transition plan, methodology and inputs ISED application and certificate authorization processes ISED and FCC collaborating on joint transition plan Following incentive auction completion New DTV allotment plan Transition plan and schedule Transition will begin Cross-border coordination for DTV, mobile operations Transition and post-transition

Timelines