Pros and cons interleaving the filling of the LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerology (P. Baudrenghien) For each ring: Convention 1: The 400 MHz RF defines buckets, spaced by one RF period, and numbered from 1 to Convention.
Advertisements

8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
11 October 2006Basic Layout of LER G. de Rijk1 Basic Layout of LER  The basic idea  VLHC type magnets  LER in the LHC tunnel  Layout  LER experiment.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.
Beam expected in the afternoon PM: – Establish first-turn – Establish closed orbit – Rough correction of machine parameters Evening: – RF capture Night:
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Friday to Saturday 02:00: Machine closed. 09:00: Cryogenics all OK. Preparing pre-cycle. 10:00: Pre-cycle started. 11:30: Pre-cycle finished. 14:00: Beam.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
LHC Progress Friday 30 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.
Overview WP14 Developments Hardware  Interferometry on the spare TDIs, planned to be installed Christmas stop 2015/2016. Final acceptance tests ongoing.
LHC Progress Thursday 29 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.
J.M. Jowett, S. Maury, PANIC05 HI Satellite meeting, 23/11/ LHC as a Heavy-Ion Collider An update John M. Jowett, Stephan Maury I-LHC Project CERN.
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
-9:00: Test IP transverse adjustment (CMS) and optics verification.
Friday 18/03 07:15 Test ramp with pilot after the test of dynamic FIDEL correction. Ramp was OK, but fill was stopped due to the trip of several RQTFs.
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Friday 30th September 06:00 Operator dump fill #2171, int. lumi about 75 pb-1 Previous operator dump from physics was on 14 September ! 07:00 Start of.
Summary of week 7 Hardware Commissioning:
Machine plans - Alignment workshop
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
Thursday morning – optics correction
Summary of Week 11: 14 – 21 March
Thursday 17th May 01:11 Fill #2633 dump in squeeze arc circulator load channel Ad1B 03:16 Fill #2644 Stable beams, lumi 5.2e33 cm-2s-1 04:38 Dumped by.
LHCCWG Meeting R. Alemany, M. Lamont, S. Page
MD#4 Progress MD Coordinators: Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann
Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
MD#4 Progress MD Coordinators: Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann
Friday morning 10:30 Optics measurements and corrections.
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.
Monday Fill 1803 into stable beams at 9:30. Dump at 19:45.
Friday 28 October 2011.
Wednesday 23/2 Thanks CRYO!!!.
Thursday 30th September De-bunching test
Thursday - setup 10:00 Starting pre-cycle. 11:30 Injection.
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Another Immortal Fill….
Gap Transient Suppression using Increased Bunch Density
Thu :00 Dumped beams, refill for Pb-Pb physics. No more protons in 2011… Some changes: Increase of flat top total voltage to 14 MV. Feed-forward.
Wednesday morning / afternoon
Monday 14th May 00:03UFO at BLMQI.06R8.B2E10_MQML. Beam dump Re-steering required for TI2 03:28 STABLE BEAMS # e11 ppb, 4.11e33 cm-2s-1 13:36.
Tuesday 6th April 8:00 Injection studies 16:00 RF studies
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
15/12/2009 Vacuum interlock in sector 78 understood  out-gassing of a Penning gauge ignited as a result of ionization or dust arcing In conclusion: NO.
Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Thursday 10:00 Fill 1986 in stable beams.
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

Pros and cons interleaving the filling of the LHC S. Fartoukh AB/ABP, LHCCWG 9 October 2007 Pre-requisite for any filling scheme Arguments in favor of an interleaved filling scheme Arguments against “Conclusions” S. Fartoukh, LHCCWG, 9 October 2007

Pre-requisites for any filling scheme   A circulating “measurable” beam before the injection of any nominal bunches, e.g. a pilot bunch, for optics checks (orbit, Q, Q’, eventually coupling and beta’s). A check and readjustment, if needed, of the main beam observables on the injection plateau before re-injecting new nominal bunches. S. Fartoukh, LHCCWG, 9 October 2007

Arguments (LHC related) in favor an interleaved filling scheme   RF : none BT : none BI : none ABP : none, except LEPII experience where it was impossible to stack one beam when the 4 buckets of the other beam was full, but … parasitic beam-beam effect was much stronger (e.g. very small separation due to limited strength in the electrostatic separators). S. Fartoukh, LHCCWG, 9 October 2007

Arguments (LHC related) against an interleaved filling scheme   RF : none BT : weak preference for the sequential filling scheme in case one given beam is aperture limited by the TDI of the other beam (e.g. inject beam1 with TDI of beam2 retracted, but then at some point the TDI of beam2 will have to go back in the vacuum chamber with beam1 circulating…) BI : none  ABP : two weak arguments against Life time for ions in proton-ion operation (ions must be injected after protons …if no beam-beam related limitations, see previous slide). Aperture bottle-neck in D2 (IP-side) for off-bucket particles (and pilot), getting the full kick by the MKI at each injection, see SF, LTC 2006-15 (with the interleaved scheme the number of such particles will be at least doubled …assuming no RF cleaning of the window foreseen for the next injection). S. Fartoukh, LHCCWG, 9 October 2007

“Conclusions” “Indécidable” Better to keep both options available   “Indécidable” Better to keep both options available The final answer will certainly come from turn around and average lumi optimization, e.g. What to do if Ring1 is full and the injector chain is erratically not operational to complete the filling of Ring2? … Ramp with strong current asymmetry, i.e. with a huge number of super packman bunches? … Or dump and refill in interleaved mode, if available? S. Fartoukh, LHCCWG, 9 October 2007