Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
Common logical forms Study the following four arguments.
Syllogisms Formal Reasoning.
Uses for Truth Tables Determine the truth conditions for any compound statementDetermine the truth conditions for any compound statement Determine whether.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
An Introduction to Propositional Logic Translations: Ordinary Language to Propositional Form.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Discrete Mathematics and its Applications
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1.
1.1 Sets and Logic Set – a collection of objects. Set brackets {} are used to enclose the elements of a set. Example: {1, 2, 5, 9} Elements – objects inside.
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
FALLACIES CHAPTERS 8 & 9. DEDUCTIVE REASONING From general to specific; have a law, premise, or principle Insert a specific fact or event regarding that.
Chapter 1-4: Properties Commutative Property: the order in which you add or multiply numbers does not change the sum or product Ex = * 8.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
The Inverse Error Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
 I can identify and use the properties of real numbers.
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education1 Critical Thinking Chapter 13 Writing Argumentative Essays.
The Logic of Atomic Sentences Chapter 2 Language, Proof and Logic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
1-1 © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter 1 Real Numbers and Algebraic Expressions Active Learning Questions.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
+ Properties of Real Numbers. + Properties Relationships that are always true fro real numbers are called properties. Properties are rules used to rewrite.
Evaluate Inductive Reasoning and Spot Inductive Fallacies
1-4 Properties How are real-life situations commutative?
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
 Have homework out ready to check.  Ask a neighbor for help if needed!
Deductive reasoning.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
© 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Deductive Arguments.
{P} ⊦ Q if and only if {P} ╞ Q
Disjunctive Syllogism
The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic.
Common logical forms Study the following four arguments.
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Principles of Computing – UFCFA3-30-1
Critical thinking 11th Meeting.
Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
7.1 Rules of Implication I Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.
Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proof, Sets, and Functions
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Logical Forms.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Back to “Serious” Topics…
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
The Logic of Declarative Statements
COMP 1380 Discrete Structures I Thompson Rivers University
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
How to Think Logically.
Chapter 8 Natural Deduction
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies Chapter 8 Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies

Deductive Validity and Language An argument is deductively valid if there is no possibility, real or imaginable: Short of changing the very meanings of the terms and the rules of grammar: That will make the premises all true and the conclusion false © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Deductive Validity and Language Certain configurations of language form deductively valid argument templates Without violating the meanings of the words/grammatical rules of the language: There is no possible way for the premises all to be true and the conclusion false © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Deductive Validity and Language Reasoning Deductively about Declarative Statements Denying the Consequent Affirming the Antecedent Disjunctive Syllogism Neither, Unless, and Only © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Deductive Validity and Language Reasoning Deductively about Classes of Objects Applying a Generalization Applying an Exception The Power of Only One of the most interesting words in the language: © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Deductive Validity and Language Only has the power to change the meaning of a sentence depending on where it is placed Classes and Objects Reasoning Deductively about Relationships Natural languages are rich with terms that describe relationships © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Deductive Validity and Language Our understanding of the logical implications of relational terms is part of: Our comprehension of language Transitivity, Reflexivity, and Identity Transitivity Relationship Reflexivity Relationship Identity Relationship © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Grammatically Equivalent Structures © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fallacies Masquerading as Valid Deductive Arguments Just as there are valid argument templates there are fallacious argument templates Precision of thought and expression is the key to avoiding these mistakes in: Our own argument making and also in our evaluation of the arguments offered to us © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fallacies Masquerading as Valid Deductive Arguments Fallacies When Reasoning with Declarative Statements Affirming the Consequent Denying the Antecedent The House M.D. Fallacy Fallacies When Reasoning about Classes of Objects © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fallacies Masquerading as Valid Deductive Arguments There are logically correct ways of reasoning about classes of objects & their members: There are familiar mistakes we often hear being made False Classification Examples of False Classification seem remarkably abundant © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fallacies Masquerading as Valid Deductive Arguments Fallacies of Composition and Division Reasoning about the relationships of parts and wholes can appear to be deductively valid: But fail because the attribute that applies to the parts may not apply to the whole, or vice versa Mistaken Identity © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fallacies Masquerading as Valid Deductive Arguments Fallacies that occur when reasoning about relationships like identity, reflexivity, or transitivity: Most often occur when people think they are talking about the same thing, but in fact are not False Reference Create Your Own Deductive Reasoning Examples © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.