11. Experimental Research: Factorial Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidelines for IDing Experimental Design Levels/ participant? One Independent Groups design More than one Repeated Measures design Once: incomplete Yes:
Advertisements

Complex Experimental Designs
Anthony Greene1 Advanced ANOVA 2-Way ANOVA Complex Factorial Designs I.The Factorial Design II.Partitioning The Variance For Multiple Effects III.Independent.
FACTORIAL ANOVA Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
FACTORIAL ANOVA. Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
Factorial Designs Passer Chapter 9
Issues in factorial design
Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
Chapter 9 – Factorial Designs Factorial Design -- definition –Two or more IVs –every level of one IV combined with every level of other IV –IVs -- called.
11. Experimental Research: Factorial Design What are factorial experimental designs, and what advantages do they have over one-way experiments? What is.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Dr George Sandamas Room TG60
Two Factor ANOVA.
FACTORIAL ANOVA.
One-Way Between Subjects ANOVA. Overview Purpose How is the Variance Analyzed? Assumptions Effect Size.
Factorial ANOVA 2-Way ANOVA, 3-Way ANOVA, etc.. Factorial ANOVA One-Way ANOVA = ANOVA with one IV with 1+ levels and one DV One-Way ANOVA = ANOVA with.
Lecture 16 Psyc 300A. What a Factorial Design Tells You Main effect: The effect of an IV on the DV, ignoring all other factors in the study. (Compare.
2x2 ANOVA BG & MG Models Kinds of Factorial Designs ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Causal Interpretation of Factorial Results.
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Factorial Designs More than one Independent Variable: Each IV is referred to as a Factor All Levels of Each IV represented in the Other IV.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.
Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
Experimental Group Designs
Understanding the Two-Way Analysis of Variance
ANOVA: Factorial Designs. Experimental Design Choosing the appropriate statistic or design involves an understanding of  The number of independent variables.
ANOVA Chapter 12.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Factorial Treatments & Interactions.
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs. Factors Same thing as Independent variables. Referred to as factors when there are more than one in a study. Factorial.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs.
Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.
Factorial ANOVAs.  Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Allows you to enter multiple predictors and parcel out the variance in the outcome due to.
Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Prof. Andy Field.
Review of Results From data analysis to presentation.
Review During the last lecture we were discussing the use of experiments as a way of answering questions about the causal relationship between variables.
Week of April 20 1.Experiments with unequal sample sizes 2.Analysis of unequal sample sizes: ANOVA approach 3.Analysis of unequal sample sizes: MRC approach.
Statistics for Everyone Workshop Fall 2010 Part 4B Two-Way Analysis of Variance: Examining the Individual and Joint Effects of 2 Independent Variables.
10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs What types of evidence allow us to conclude that one variable causes another variable? How do experimental research.
Handout Eight: Two-Way Between- Subjects Design with Interaction- Assumptions, & Analyses EPSE 592 Experimental Designs and Analysis in Educational Research.
Making Inferences about Causality In general, children who watch violent television programs tend to behave more aggressively toward their peers and siblings.
Analysis of Variance and Covariance
Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3)
Chapter 10: Complex Experimental Designs
Factorial Experiments
Practice Participants were asked about their current romantic relationship (dating, married, or cohabitating) and the number of children they have (none,
Inferential Statistics
Experimental Research Designs
Multiple Causes of Behavior
Between-Subjects, within-subjects, and factorial Experimental Designs
Factorial Design Part II
Factorial Experimental Designs
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Least Squares ANOVA & ANCOV
How to Interpret a 2-Way ANOVA
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs.
Between-Subjects Factorial Design
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Analgesic study with three treatments crossed with gender.
Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences
Complex Experimental Designs
How to Interpret a 2-Way ANOVA
Review Compare one sample to another value One sample t-test
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Soc 3306a Lecture 11: Multivariate 4
Complex Experimental Designs
Chapter 13 Group Differences
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
Factorial Designs Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (Independent Variables) A two-factor design has two IVs. Example:
Presentation transcript:

11. Experimental Research: Factorial Design What are factorial experimental designs, and what advantages do they have over one-way experiments? What is meant by crossing the factors in a factorial design? What are main effects, interactions, and simple effects? What are some of the possible patterns that interaction can take? How are the data from a factorial design presented in the research reports? What is a mixed factorial design? What is the purpose of comparing means, and what statistical techniques are used to do this?

Factorial Experimental Designs Experimental designs with more than one independent variable. The term factor refer to each of manipulated independent variables. 2 Factors Example. IV. Sex (male, female), Ethnicity (Black, White, Asian, Latino) DV. Self-esteem 4 levels 2 levels Black White Asian Ratino M F 20 24 19 20 24 18 20 21 Cells 2  4 designs

The Two-Way Design Example. Violent cartoons and children’s frustrated state increase their aggressive behavior. IV: Violent Cartoons vs. Nonviolent Cartoons Frustrated State vs. Non Frustrated State DV: Children’s aggressive behaviors. Violent Nonviolent Frustrated Not frustrated Av. M = 2.97 Av. M = 3.90 M = 2.68 N= 10 M = 3.25 N= 10 M = 5.62 N= 10 M = 2.17 N= 10 Av. M = 4.15 Av. M = 2.71

Main Effects, Interactions, and Simple Effects The effect of each factors Main Effects The effects in which the influence of one factor on the DV is different at different levels of another factors. Interactions Simple Effects The effect of one factor within a level of another factor Violent Nonviolent Frustrated Not frustrated Av. M = 2.97 Av. M = 3.90 M = 2.68 N= 10 M = 3.25 N= 10 M = 5.62 N= 10 M = 2.17 N= 10 Av. M = 4.15 Av. M = 2.71

ANOVA Summary Table Source Sum of df Mean F p-value Squares Square DV: Aggressive Play Cartoon 23.56 1 23.56 4.56 .04* Prior State 11.33 1 11.33 2.00 .17 Cartoon by Prior State 29.45 1 29.45 5.87 .03* Residual 41.33 36 5.17 Total 94.67 39 59.51

Chart Cartoon Residual Prior State C & PS

Understanding Interactions DV DV DV Frustrated Nonfrustrated Violent Nonviolent Violent Nonviolent Violent Nonviolent Patterns with Main Effects Only

Understanding Interactions DV DV DV Frustrated Nonfrustrated Crossover Interaction Violent Nonviolent Violent Nonviolent Violent Nonviolent Patterns with Main Effects & Interaction Only

Interpretation and Presentation of Main Effects and Interpretations 2 (cartoon)  2 (prior state) ANOVA was conducted. The results indicated that there were significant main effect of cartoon, F (1, 38) = 4.45, p < .05. Children who viewed the violent cartoon (M = 2.89) were rated as playing more aggressively than children who had viewed the nonviolent cartoon (M = 1.52). This main effect, however, should be qualified by the interaction with prior state, F (1, 36) = 4.42, p < .05. Children who were frustrated and viewed the violent cartoon (M = 5.55) were rated as playing more aggressively than children in other conditions (M = 1.11, 1.48, 1.54, respectively).