Sounding and P Matrix Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sounding and P Matrix Proposal
Advertisements

Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Doc.: IEEE /0371r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom BF Feedback and Protocol Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Doc.:IEEE /0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date:
Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2012 Ron Murias, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Preamble Format For 1 MHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /1243r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Sun Bo, ZTE Corporation Nov, 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0617r0 Submission NDP sounding May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Beam Tracking for ay Date: Authors: January 2017
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
SU Sounding Measurement Exchange and Feedback
80MHz Tone Allocation Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
AID Selection Date: Authors: September 2010 Month Year
Preamble Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
VHT Link Adaptations Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
VHT-STF for 11AC Date: Authors: Month Year
Pilot Sequence for VHT-DATA
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
Reverse Direction in ac
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Reducing Channel Dimension in MU-MIMO CSI Feedback
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
VHT Frame Padding - Summary
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Cyclic Shift For More Than 4 Antennas in Non-VHT Portion
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
Single User MCS Proposal
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Reducing Channel Dimension in MU-MIMO Explicit Feedback Operation
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
HE-LTF Capabilities Date: Authors: July 2016
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
11bd Frame Format Date: Authors: March 2019
VHT LO Leakage Requirement
VHT LO Leakage Requirement
VHT LO Leakage Requirement
VHT LO Leakage Requirement
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Sounding and P Matrix Proposal Month Year Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Sounding and P Matrix Proposal Date: 2010-05-16 Authors: Slide 1 Vinko Erceg et al. Page 1 John Doe, Some Company John Doe, Some Company

Introduction Sounding Format 6x6 and 8x8 P matrices P matrices for Nsts<=4 Vinko Erceg et al.

Sounding Mechanism (1) In 11n, there are multiple sounding formats: Staggered sounding NDP sounding It would be desirable in TGac to converge onto a single sounding format Compatibility and interoperability complications with multiple formats Our proposal is to converge onto a single sounding mechanism: NDP sounding frame format Slide 3 Vinko Erceg et al.

Sounding Mechanism (2) NDP sounding advantages Defines a cleaner and simpler immediate feedback protocol ACK is not required Less latency in providing CSI feedback when to compared to staggered sounding No Data present May be important for MU feedback Channel staleness problem Only channel estimation for CSI feedback is performed after receiving an NDP packet Potential parallel processing for data demodulation is avoided Works well with MU sounding mechanism Sounding for multiple users Slide 4 Vinko Erceg et al.

P Matrix Definition (1) In TGac, new P matrices for Nsts > 4 need to be defined Proposal to define 6x6 DFT matrix P as follows Slide 5 Vinko Erceg et al.

P Matrix Definition (2) Proposal to define 8x8 matrix P as follows: where P4x4 is the 11n 4x4 P matrix Slide 6 Vinko Erceg et al.

P Matrix Definition (3) We propose the same P matrix as in 11n, when Nsts<=4 in 11ac packets We propose not to include 5x5 and 7x7 P matrices in the draft Tgac standard due to implementation complexity reasons Slide 7 Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Polls Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #1 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.1.J: All VHT transmissions shall have a preamble which contains a single section of long training fields,  with each long training field multiplied by entries belonging to a single P matrix, to enable channel estimation at the receiver. Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #2 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.2.C: The draft specification shall include null data packet (NDP) as the only preamble format for sounding PPDUs. Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #3 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.1.K: The single section of long training fields consists of one, two, four, six or eight VHT long training fields (VHT-LTFs) that are necessary for demodulation of the VHT-Data portion of the PPDU or for channel estimation during an NDP packet. Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #4 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.1.K: The VHT-LTF mapping matrix P for one, two or four VHT-LTFs shall be the same as defined in 802.11n standard specification (Section 20.3.9.4.6, Eq. (20-27)). Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #5 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.1.L: The VHT-LTF mapping matrix P for six VHT-LTFs shall be as defined in slide 4 of 11-10/00xxr0. Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.

Straw Poll #6 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.1.L: The VHT-LTF mapping matrix P for eight VHT-LTFs shall be as defined in slide 5 of 11-10/00xxr0. Yes: No: Abs: Vinko Erceg et al.