Interconnecting IXPs: pros and cons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cutting Edge Interconnection for DE-CIX members
Advertisements

Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
RIPE63 – EIX Working Group Wolfgang Tremmel Director Support Proxy-Arp considered harmful.
RIPE67 Athens Wolfgang Tremmel DE-CIX Apollon Migration Update.
Q4 2004On-Band Corporation 1 Satellite On-Demand Global IP Broadband Reseller/Service Overview.
The Role IXPs and Peering Play in the Evolution of the Internet MENOG14, Dubai, March 2014 Stephen Wilcox, President and CTO, IX Reach.
Module 5 - Switches CCNA 3 version 3.0 Cabrillo College.
TIX – Telehouse Zurich Internet Exchange By Andre Oppermann TIX founder and project manager SWINOG Meeting, Berne, 18. October 2000.
A Business Case for Peering in 2010 William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR.
IXP & Neutral Colocation Symbiosis SAFNOG Data Centre definition In its simplest form, a data centre is a facility that houses IT equipment – Servers,
Importance and Benefits of IXPs
Network Devices BY JACKSON HARDESTY. Hubs  Hubs are a now outdated way of sending signals at layer 2 compared to switches.  Hubs are used primarily.
International infrastructure outsource models Eckart Zollner Safnog 2 April 2015.
NaMeX Nautilus Mediterranean eXchange point Maurizio Goretti CEO Skype: maurizio.goretti sip: RIPE 61 – Rome.
Scaling IXPs Scalable Infrastructure Workshop. Objectives  To explain scaling options within the IXP  To introduce the Internet Routing Registry at.
Internet Peering in the UK Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange 13th May 1998.
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
A Scottish Internet Exchange: Benefits, Viability, Options Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Ltd Director, NOMINET Chair, RIPE.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
1 Internet Society Creating an Enabling Environment for the Internet: Role of IXPs ENOG 8 – 9 September 2014, Baku Maarit Palovirta, European Regional.
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004.
© XchangePoint 2001 Growing Your IP Business by Addressing Your Customers’ Broadband Content Needs Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer Global IP Carriers.
24/02/20050 Euro-IX update APNIC 19 - IX SIG Kyoto Japan by Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX
An Overview of Peering; Benefits of Peering Andrew Ogilvie Managing Director, Xtraordinary Networks Ltd
Policies for Peering and Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 8.
0 HKIX Hong Kong Internet eXchange Cheng, Che-Hoo Computer Services Center The Chinese University of Hong Kong
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Services in a Converged WAN Accessing the WAN – Chapter 1.
Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon.
Marco Brandstaetter Business Development, DE-CIX Management GmbH The (unknown) arguments for peering.
Routing integrity in a world of Bandwidth on Demand Dave Wilson DW238-RIPE
November 1999 London Internet Exchange Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman JPIX Meeting, July 2000.
RONOG2 - INTRODUCTION INTERLAN & THE OPERATORS’ COMMUNITY.
Why SingTel Won’t Peer William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. Asia Pacific Peering Forum Singapore, Oct. 5, 2006 Slide Set.
Internet Exchange Points: A Business & Policy Perspective AFIX Decision-makers’ Workshop Session 1 AFIX-TF,
Benefits and Value of an IXP The IXP Value Proposition.
Euro-IX update IX SIG APNIC17 Kuala Lumpur Feb 25 th Euro-IX update APNIC 17 - IX SIG 25 th February Kuala Lumpur Serge Radovcic Euro-IX.
The Benefit and Need of Standard Contribution for IXPs Jan Stumpf System Engineer.
How to build a successful Internet exchange in the Middle East March 2016 MENOG 16, Istanbul Marco Brandstaetter Business Development
Investigation of Traffic Dependencies between IXPs in Failure Scenarios APRICOT 2016, Peering Forum Auckland, New Zealand Arnold Nipper Chief.
LCG France Network Network 11/2010 Centre de Calcul de l'IN2P3/CNRS.
Two Modest Proposals for Improving the Economic Efficiency of Colocation Facilities Version 0.2 December, 2000 Bill Woodcock Packet Clearing House.
An Ongoing Initiative Arjan Xhelaj – RASH Daniele Arena – NaMeX
Introduction to Networks
LESSON 2.1_A Networking Fundamentals Understand Switches.
Introduction to Exchange Point Economics
Internet Traffic Management and Accounting Workshop
HSCN Supplier Workshop – 19th May 2016
Traffic Volume Dependencies between IXPs
Montenegro Internet eXchange Point (MIXP) – a success story
CS 4700 / CS 5700 Network Fundamentals
How do we decide where to deploy to next?
Interconnecting IXPs: pros and cons
The Internet: A System of Interconnected Autonomous Systems
Module 5 - Switches CCNA 3 version 3.0.
Internet Interconnection
APNIC 21- IX SIG Perth Australia by Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX
Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs
Writing the Business Plan
RIPE SEE 7: 18 – 19 June 2018, Timișoara, Romania
RIPE77, Amsterdam 17 October 2018
Euro-IX Update Julia Lechien
Interconnection services UPDATE
Multicast TV Exchange Point
NIX.cz 20th Anniversary November 2016 bijal at euro-ix dot net
Copenhagen, Denmak Bijal Sanghani
Internet eXchange Point Database Netnod Meeting– 2018
Internet Exchange.
Where global business and growth connect
RIPE78, Reykjavik Bijal Sanghani
Presentation transcript:

Interconnecting IXPs: pros and cons 2012-04-18 RIPE 64 Arnold Nipper CTO/COO arnold.nipper@de-cix.net

Agenda Definition of an IXP Examples of Interconnections Motivation Definition of an IXP Examples of Interconnections Reseller Programs Summary 13. November 2018 – DE-CIX Management GmbH

Motivation Reseller Programs at IXP are a hype nowadays Panel discussion at 19th Euro-IX forum in October 2011 in Lyon Start a discussion on the nature of IXP

Definition of an IXP (distributed) Layer 2 infrastructure under a single administrative and technical control Purpose is to facilitate (settlement free) peering between ISPs (in a broadest sense. I.e. everyone that does have an ASN) Increase quality and save costs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_Connectivity_Distribution_%26_Core.svg

Diameter of an IXP Originally all IXP simply were a single switch/hub For resiliency and to cover more colocations IXP spread across a (not so?) well-defined area The diameter (direct reach with own equipment) depends on the geographic location of the IXP London / LINX 45 / 50 km Moscow / MSK-IX 40 / 30 km Tokyo / JPIX Tokyo 50 / 10 km Frankfurt / DE-CIX 20 / 15 km Other metrics like cost of fibres?

Value of an IXP / Critical mass / Gravity Assumptions next best alternative for peering is buying transit Transit prices range from 1€/Mbps - 5€/Mbps Simplified model (only IXP fees vs. transit) CostIXP = sum (Pi*Ci) Pi is the number of Ports of Speed i Ci is the cost of a Port of Speed i CostDE-CIX is ~ 1.3 Mio € ValueIXP = Peaktraffic * Cost of Transit ValueDE-CIX is ~ 3.5 Mio € Value/Cost ratio: ValueIXP/CostIXP DE-CIX: 2.7

Value of an IXP / critical mass / gravity #customer Traffic (Gbps) Traffic/customer DE-CIX 439 1861 4.239 AMS-IX 483 1529 3.165 LINX 409 1193 2.916 MSK-IX 354 663 1.872 UA-IX 102 294 2.882 Netnod 76 272 3.578 NIX.CZ 104 207 1.990 NL-ix 159 0.584 Source: https://www.euro-ix.net/ixp-matrix

Value of an IXP / critical mass / gravity Each IXP tries to increase the critical mass / value according to its own metrics Amount of traffic Number of customers Number of (unique) prefixes Number of carriers The better the gravity the more customers Like a party: the more guests there are, the more will come

Technically interconnecting IXPs Simplest approach is to create a single broadcast domain Being under single administration or not Customers on IXP1 is able to peer with all customers at IXP2 and vice versa If under different administration IXP1 and IXP2 have to agree on clear interfaces between the bigger IXP and create common procedures to resolve issues

Technically interconnecting IXPs Using VPLS or Vlan technologies to hand off each customer on a single “adminstrative” port though using bigger pipes to interconnect VPLS interconnection became attractive recently when IXPs moved to VPLS for the own infrastructure Vlan interconnect is around for years

Examples of Interconnections (Lyonix – Topix) Lyonix (Lyon, France) and Topix (Turin, Italy) are fully interconnected to each other (1Gbps) Costs are shared among each other Purpose is also to develop the region Each customer of Lyonix is able to become a customer of Topix and vice versa No price reductions

Examples of Interconnections (InterLAN – BalkanIX) BalkanIX (Sofia, Bulgaria) is connected to InterLAN (Bucharest, Romania) via 10Gbps Technically BalkanIX is putting a switch in a colocation facility in Bucharest BalkanIX customers are not paying for using InterLAN services

Examples of Interconnecctions (France-IX – SFINX) France-IX (Paris, France) and SFINX (Paris, France) are interconnected Located in some same colocation in Paris (i.e. local loops only) Free of charge, but limited to a certain bandwidth If more bandwidth is needed you have to join the other IXP

Reseller Programs Using VPLS in the IXP network facilitates reseller programs Use one 10Gbps port to connect lots of (small) customers Other (smaller?) IXP seem to be partners of first choice Do have customer relation already Connection to IXP is physically established But is this win/win? Business for carriers who are connected to lots of IXP

Don’t do! Leave your home turf (i.e. go beyond your diameter) Your carrier customers will lose revenue on local backhaul If you run several IXP, don’t interconnect them You turn from an IXP to carrier / ISP

Summary Reseller/partner programs does not really mean interconnecting IXP but using synergies Interconnecting smaller IXP can make sense to gain more critical mass / better gravity The “P” in IXP stands for “point” 

Thank you Join DE-CIX now! DE-CIX Competence Center Lindleystrasse 12 60314 Frankfurt/Germany Phone +49 69 1730 902 - 0 info@de-cix.net DE-CIX Competence Center @ Kontorhaus Building Frankfurt Osthafen (Docklands) 13. November 2018 – DE-CIX Management GmbH