Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rare Charm Decays Recent Results from FOCUS (+Theory) Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS collaboration) FPCP5 (05/17/02) SM MSSM Exotics.
Advertisements

The FOCUS Collaboration Univ. of California-Davis, CBPF-Rio de Janeiro, CINVESTAV-Mexico City, Univ. Colorado-Boulder, FERMILAB, Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign,
1 Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay,   → p     HyangKyu Park University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for the HyperCP collaboration.
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
29 June 2004Steve Armstrong - Searches for Pentaquark Production at LEP1 Searches for Pentaquark Production at LEP Steve Armstrong (ALEPH Collaboration)
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Rare Charm Decays from FOCUS Angel M. López University of Puerto Rico (Mayaguez) Outline  Theory – Why Study These Decays?  Basic Blind Analysis Methodology.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.
Evidence for the Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decays ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam, July 27, 2002 Jeffrey D. Richman UC Santa Barbara for the B A B AR Collaboration.
Alex Melnitchouk DPF conference - May Search for Fermiophobic Higgs in the h   Channel DPF 2002, Williamsburg Alex Melnitchouk (Brown University)
Outline Detectors and Methods –Spectrometer layout –Segmented target, OOT cut effectiveness –CITADL Kaonicity pion ID effect on K-pi reflection –Target.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Results from BaBar on the Decays B  Kl + l - and B  K*l + l - FPCP-2002, U.Pennsylvania John J. Walsh INFN-Pisa.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
Jane Nachtman University of Iowa (for CDF Collaboration)
More results from the OPERA experiment
Converted photons efficiency
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
W. Wester, CDF, Fermilab, Beauty 2005, Assisi
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Pentaquark Searches and DsJ Studies in BaBar
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Comparing Data and MC CITADL Variables on Ks and KK
Rare and Forbidden Decays in the Standard Model
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Observation of non-BBar decays of (4S)p+p- (1S, 2S)
Presentation transcript:

Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS Angel M. López University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez DPF Meeting August 10, 2000 DPF2000

Three Categories of Decays FCNC D+  K+ l + l – D+  + l + l – Ds+  K+ l + l – Ds+  + l + l – D0  l + l – LFNV D+  K+ ± e D+   + ± e Ds+  K+ ± e Ds+   + ± e D0  ± e LNV D+  K- l + l + D+   - l + l + Ds+  K- l + l + Ds+   - l + l + Talk will present D0  + - analysis of complete FOCUS data set as an example of our rare decay reach. Will show preliminary evaluations of sensitivity for these decays. DPF2000

FOCUS has reconstructed over one million charm decays from the Fermilab 1997 fixed target run Use horizontal version of slide Spectrometer is 30m long OE is 23 layers of Pb, Tile-Fiber Tiles are 10 x 10 x 0.5cm An excellent vertex detector but also great particle id including full muon detection and E&M calorimetry . DPF2000

Event Selection Criteria Vertexing (Candidate driven) Secondary vertex Confidence Level Isolation - No other tracks come from that vertex. Primary vertex Require consistent with D track from secondary Require a minimum multiplicity Isolation - No tracks from secondary are consistent with coming from the primary. In target (z position) Detachment (L/) DPF2000

More Event Selection Criteria Muon Identification Number of Muon Planes with Hits (Mupl) Confidence Level Not consistent with being a kaon. Hadron identification – Triple Cerenkov System Log likelihood for consistency between Cerenkov hits and a particular particle id hypothesis Compare log likelihoods for different species (Kaonicity) DPF2000

Fixed (loose) Cuts Vertexing Muon Identification CLP and CLS > 1% Primary Multiplicity > 2 L/ > 3 Muon Identification Mupl 4 Confidence Level > 1% DPF2000

Mass Distributions with Fixed Cuts Fairly clean even with loose cuts but can be improved. Signal area (±2) has been masked in data (blind analysis). DPF2000

Optimization of Cuts – Blind Analysis Only sidebands are used to study background. First determine cut ranges by looking at individual variable histograms. Vertexing CLS > 1%, 5%, 10% ISOS < 10-4, 10-3, 10-2 ISOP < 10-4, 10-3, 10-2 Distance of primary outside target edge < 0, 2 Muon Identification Mupl 4, 5, 6 Confidence Level > 1%, 3%, 5% Kaonicity < 2, 5, 8 DPF2000

More Blind Analysis Determine a baseline set of cuts with the best (lowest) “sensitivity”. (Branching Ratio) (Sensitivity) NL is the average of the 90% upper limit for an ensemble of experiments with zero signal and the background rate estimated from the sidebands. DPF2000

90% Confidence Intervals Table Including Uncertainty in Background Estimate From hep/ph0005187. The number of events in the signal region is x. The background is estimated as y /  from an observation of y sideband events. This table is for the case  = 2. DPF2000

Optimum Set of Cuts and Sensitivity The sensitivity is more than a factor of 2 lower than the existing limit. DPF2000

Mass Distributions for Optimized Cuts There are two events in the sidebands. DPF2000

Effects of Background from Meson Misid Doubly mis-identified D0 K- + needs to be studied to determine the ratio () of the background in the sidebands to the background under the peak. The preliminary sensitivity was found by assuming a linear background which is justified for most backgrounds such as Bethe-Heitler pairs. A significant effect from D0  K- + would mean  is larger and the actual sensitivity is smaller. Can be studied with data and Monte Carlo. DPF2000

Background from D0  - + is negligible. Doubly misid-ed D0  - + is a worry because it peaks in the signal! A Monte Carlo study with statistics equal to ten times FOCUS finds no events that survive all the baseline cuts. No event survives all cuts. DPF2000

Monte Carlo simulates pion misid well. DPF2000

Studies of D+ or Ds+  h   For now, preliminary estimates. Vertex cuts (not optimized) L /  > 20 CLS > 1% Efficiencies (conservative estimates) Assume efficiencies cancel except particle id. Cerenkov cut on kaon ~ 80% Muon Id ~ 95% ISOP < 1% Relative trigger efficiency ~ 80% DPF2000

DPF2000