Marine bioacoustics Current Biology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sea turtles Current Biology
Advertisements

Coral Reefs: Building a Better Crystal Ball
Coevolutionary Biology: Sex and the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R447-R448 (June 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages R97-R98 (February 2011)
Fan worm eyes Current Biology
Mark J. Costello, Chhaya Chaudhary
Colour Vision: Understanding #TheDress
Dispersal Ecology: Where Have All the Seeds Gone?
The cocktail party problem
Tread-water feeding of Bryde’s whales
Visual cortex: A cat's-eye view of the visual system
Marine microplastics Current Biology
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages R147-R148 (February 2009)
Genomics: An Inordinate Fondness for Beetles
Ecology: The Upside-Down World of Coral Reef Predators
Mark J. Costello, Chhaya Chaudhary  Current Biology 
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Marine bioacoustics Current Biology
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages R599-R600 (June 2017)
Spontaneous human speech mimicry by a cetacean
Neutrophil extracellular traps
Infant cognition Current Biology
The cry embedded within the purr
Worries over conservation plans
Ocean sunfish as indicators for the ‘rise of slime’
Evolution: Predator versus Parasite
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages R1114-R1116 (December 2015)
American birds: Audubon was not the first
David M. Wilkinson, Euan G. Nisbet, Graeme D. Ruxton  Current Biology 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Volume 21, Issue 14, Pages R528-R529 (July 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages R752-R754 (August 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages R453-R455 (June 2008)
Marine microplastics Current Biology
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages R60-R61 (January 2014)
Vision: When Does Looking Bigger Mean Seeing Better?
Diel vertical migration
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages R364-R365 (May 2013)
Better Fruits and Vegetables through Sensory Analysis
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Saving endangered whales at no cost
Sea turtles Current Biology
Locomotion: Why We Walk the Way We Walk
Víctor Huertas, David R. Bellwood  Current Biology 
Imaginal discs Current Biology
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)
It’s all about the constraints
P granules Current Biology
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Palaeobiology: Born and Gone in Global Warming
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Visual aftereffects Current Biology
The cause of colouration in the ctenophore Beroë cucumis
Biodiversity: Not Just Lots of Fish in the Sea
The rapid mandible strike of a termite soldier
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages R147-R151 (June 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Basal bodies Current Biology
Axis Formation: Squint Comes into Focus
Genomics: An Inordinate Fondness for Beetles
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Ocean Ecology: Don't Fence Me in
Presentation transcript:

Marine bioacoustics Current Biology John C. Montgomery, Craig A. Radford  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R502-R507 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.041 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The marine bioacoustic environment. Diagram of the frequency range of some common sources of abiotic, biotic and anthropogenic sounds: geophony: earthquakes; waves; and rain; biophony: whales; fish; urchin; snapping shrimp; and dolphin; anthrophony: ship; outboard propeller; and sonar. Representative sound intensities include: received level (RL) of an earthquake approximately 700 km away 107 dB re 1 μPa at 100 Hz; blue whale source level (SL)165 dB re; 1 μPa at 1 m; supertanker 190 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m (http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/sound01/background/ acoustics/acoustics.html); fish range between RL of 100–140 dB re 1 μPa for several NZ fish species, John Dory, two spot demoiselles, gurnard and bigeye; crustaceans RL of 140 dB re 1 μPa for snapping shrimp; paddle crabs 136 dB re 1 μPa; urchins RL 140 dB re 1 μPa. (Illustration: R. Putland.) Current Biology 2017 27, R502-R507DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.041) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fish sound production and hearing. (A) John Dory (Zeus faber) sonic muscle (AS, anterior swimbladder; PS, posterior swimbladder; scale bar: 0.1 m). (B) John Dory sound spectrogram. (C) Pre-settlement triple fin (Forsterygion sp.) and microCT image of the head showing the location of the three pairs of otoliths in the skull behind the orbit (colour coded green; scale bar for the fish picture, 0.01 m). (D) Triple fin audiogram showing best hearing sensitivity in the 100–200 Hz range. (Photographic credits: John Dory, J Montgomery; triplefin, I. Macdonald; triplefin CT scan I. Anderson.) Current Biology 2017 27, R502-R507DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.041) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Acoustic ecology. (A) Sound produced by food patches and associated predators may provide a cue for pelagic predators to locate food sources. For example seabirds may locate food patches through olfactory or visual cues and then the sounds they produce through diving, or calling while sitting on the sea surface, may alert pelagic predators to the food patch. (B) Spectra of recorded sounds from the Hauraki Gulf, showing gannet diving and fish grunts. Photographic credits: gannet diving, P. Low; underwater gannet, S. Hathaway (www.stevehathaway.com); Brydes whale, S. Behrens; shark, K. Scollay, Department of Conservation, New Zealand. Current Biology 2017 27, R502-R507DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.041) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions