Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Advertisements

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 INTRODUCTION What is Happening with REACH Hong Kong
1. European Commission Status GHS Implementation in the European Community Global Thematic Workshop on Strengthening Capacities to Implement the GHS Johannesburg.
REACH and SDS Requirements Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Services.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Legislating in the EU Introducing REACH EU Lobbying for Turkish Industry 5 December 2005 Cristina.
The impacts of EU Legislation REACH on Textile & Clothing Industries ITKIB Seminar – 28 October 2008, Istanbul Otto Linher – REACH unit This presentation.
Forsigtighedstilgang – gevinst eller stopklods Precautionary Principle good or bad for innovation Bjorn Gaarn Hansen Head of Unit: Chemicals Directorate:
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Boston 27 April.
The Substitution Approach in the “White Paper on the Future EU Chemicals Policy” European Conference on Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals Hamburg, 13.
Future legislation on chemicals and REACH processes Jens Tørsløv European Chemicals Bureau Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Joint Research.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
REACH Registration, Evaluation & Authorisation of Chemicals T. Pearson.
Nano-Safety: Some Future Perspectives Conference on Nano-Safety April, Slovenia, Ljubljana Bjorn G. Hansen dHoU Chemicals, DG ENV, European Commission.
More on REACH Andrew Fasey 15 November 2005 Univ of Virginia, USA.
REACH in the eyes of a downstream user The changing market of cosmetic ingredients Aleksandra Sołyga-Żurek Warsaw, 23.XI.2011.
REACH: Protecting Your Supply Chain Georjean L. Adams EHS Strategies, Inc. November 17,
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals REACH Key issues for the paper industry CEPI Open Seminar – European Paper Week 1 December 2005.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
EU Regulation 1907/2006 on the Registration Evaluation and Authorisation of CHemicals REACH Lunch & Learn Beach Ballroom, Aberdeen 29 th August 2007 R.
European Commission REACH European Chemicals Policy Experts Tour USA, October 2003 Robert Donkers, Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.
SEMINAR “The impacts of EU Legislation REACH on Textile & Clothing Industries” October 28, 2008 ITKIB – Istanbul By Adil ELMASSI Director Environmental.
Communication in the Supply Chain
HERA STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP-11 JULY FUTURE CHEMICALS POLICY and HERA Anne-Marie Rodeyns, A.I.S.E. Deputy Director 11 July 2002.
Twinning Project RO2004/IB/EN-09 Implementation and Enforcement of the Environmental Acquis at National Level and Coordination of the 8 Regional Twinning.
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
The European Engineering Industries Association How Downstream Users REACH? Impacts and challenges of REACH for EU Cutlery, Flatware, Holloware, and Cookware.
NOVÁ STRATEGIE EU V OBLASTI CHEMICKÝCH LÁTEK REACH Karel Bláha Odbor environmentálních rizik Ministerstvo životního prostředí.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
Employment and Chemical risks Tony Musu, ETUI-REHS Developing trade union activities on sustainable development and employment Torino, 27 October 2006.
REACH: Driver of Innovation Andrew Fasey 15 November 2005 Univ of Virginia, USA.
REACH Regulation Basic requirements 1 Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M., B. Sc. Tatjana Humar-Jurič, M.Sc.
REACH Activities in progress in ITALY UNICHIM - Milano
Overview & Implications for Affinia Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals.
ETUC Conference on REACH March 2005 Improving REACH ETUC proposals for REGISTRATION Werner SCHNEIDER DGB, Germany.
Can REACH become the New Global Model? Helsinki Chemicals Forum 20 May 2010 Jukka Malm, Director ECHA – Directorate of Assessment.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.
Presentation for GBSO Networking Meeting REACH Regulation: Implications for businesses and the network.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Potential Impact on the Cotton Industry
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006
Managing the risk of industrial chemicals and biocides
Reprotoxic substances in the context of the revision of the 2004/37/EC (CMD) - Viewpoint from WPC and France - Matthieu Lassus Ministry of Labour, Employment,
Dan Tofan | Expert in NIS 21st Art. 13a WG| LISBON |
CCMI 9 September 2015 Public Hearing: Nanotechnology for a competitive chemical industry Social aspects: education, health and safety.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
22/02/2019 REACH REACH update.
The proposed legislation
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Update on EU draft Regulation
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH 11/13/2018 Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Boston 27 April 2005 Eva Sandberg DG Environment, European Commission P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

What is REACH? A Tiered Approach 11/13/2018 What is REACH? HIGH level of health and environmental protection with the goal of achieving sustainable development. Single coherent system for new (non phase-in) and existing (phase–in) chemicals Elements: Registration of substances ≥ 1 tonne/yr (staggered deadlines) More information and communication through the supply chain Evaluation of some substances by Member States Authorisation only for substances of very high concern Restrictions - the safety net Agency to manage system Focus on priorities: high volumes (early deadline) greatest concern (CMRs early) A Tiered Approach P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Scope REACH covers Manufacture, import, placing on market and use of substances Substances “on their own”, in preparations or in articles

European Chemicals Agency 11/13/2018 European Chemicals Agency Day to day management of REACH Technical, scientific and administrative aspects Responsibilities: Registration - reject or require completion of registration Evaluation - ensure a harmonised approach; take decisions. Substances in articles - require registration Authorisation/restrictions - facilitate process; suggest priorities. Secretariat for Forum and Committees Deal with appeals - registration, R&D, evaluation, confidentiality P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Registration: general 11/13/2018 Registration: general AIM: Ensure industry adequately manages the risk from its substances Method: manufacturer/importer obtains adequate information; > 10 tonnes/year: performs chemicals safety reports (inc RRM) electronic submission to Agency (completeness check) certain non-confidential information in central, largely public, database. Scope substances produced/imported  1 tonne/year intermediates - reduced requirements. exemptions - other law, Annex II/III; polymers (review); PPORD deemed as Registered - biocides, pesticides, notified substances (67/548) Consortia encouraged No formal acceptance. No registration: no manufacture or import P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Registration: information 11/13/2018 Registration: information Information requirements - smart/targeted: exposure often taken into account. new testing as a last resort – existing data, (Q)SAR, read across. Low volume chemicals (1-10 tonnes/year): mostly in-vitro. Higher volume chemicals: testing only if existing information/validated alternative methods not sufficient. Testing programmes - agreed by the competent authorities REACH = large-scale information collection ≠ large-scale testing. P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Registration: Deadlines 11/13/2018 Registration: Deadlines SIA 1 - 10 t 100 - 1000 t >1000 t + CMR 10 - 100t Yr 0 Yr 0 +3 Yr 0 + 6 Yr 0 + 11 2017 + P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Generation of Information 11/13/2018 Generation of Information Annex IX = F L E X I B I L I T Y (Q)SARs Use of category approaches Analogs, read across Available data (non-EU, GLP, non-GLP) Exposure based waiving (Annexes VII and VIII) Historical human data Data sharing (existing and new) Testing (in vitro, in vivo) as a last resort P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Chemicals Safety Assessment 11/13/2018 Chemicals Safety Assessment To be performed for all substances (per substance or per group of substances) subject to registration if above 10 tonnes/ per year Per substance or per group of substances To be documented in a Chemical Safety Report Part of the registration dossier Exemptions for substances in preparations below certain concentration limits Defined in Annex I Includes Human health hazard assessment Environmental hazard assessment PBT and vPvB assessment P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

11/13/2018 Downstream Users (DU) Manufacturer/importer CSR to cover all uses identified by downstream users. DU benefit from choice of: supplier carrying out assessment, or for confidentiality reasons doing own assessment. If using suppliers CSR just have to: implement supplier’s RRM for identified uses If carrying own CSR will have to: perform assessments only for ‘unidentified uses’ (using supplier hazard information) inform Agency of ‘unidentified uses’ ≥ 1 tonne P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Substances in Articles 11/13/2018 Substances in Articles Meet the criteria for classification as dangerous > 1 t/yr per article type per M/I Not registered further up the supply chain 11 years and 3 months after entry into force (2017+) Known to be released and Quantity released may adversely affect human health or the environment Intended to be released Duties apply to both EU and non-EU producers of articles Art. 6 has to be seen in context: lesser requirements than for manufacturers of substances Applies only 11 years +3 months after the entry into force General obligation to register Obligation to notify the Agency Agency may require registration P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Avoidance of unnecessary animal testing + save costs 11/13/2018 Data sharing Avoidance of unnecessary animal testing + save costs Information > 10 years – freely available Non-phase-in substances (= new): Already registered? Agency enables contact - 50% cost sharing Studies involving vertebrate animals not repeated Phase-in substances (= existing): Potential registrants of same substance: ‘SIEF’ Sharing mandatory (vertebrate animals), if participant refuses to share = sanctions Equal sharing of costs P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Consortia Individual Choice « One for all » Guidance on safe use Chemical Safety Report Summaries or robust study summaries of information derived from application of Annexes V bis IX Proposals for testing where required by application of Annexes V bis IX Classification and labelling Identity of M/I Identity of the substance Information on manufacture and use Statement whether information has been generated by testing on vertebrate animals

Information through the supply chain 11/13/2018 Information through the supply chain What? Expanded SDSs – info from Chemical Safety Reports Exposure scenarios as Annex Information on authorisations, restrictions, registration number etc. Information up the supply chain on new hazards and if received info is challenged. Result? more information on risks downstream users brought into the system dialogue up/down the supply chain -encouraged/stimulated Encourage communication  Improve risk management P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Evaluation Provide confidence that industry is meeting obligations 11/13/2018 Evaluation Provide confidence that industry is meeting obligations Prevent unnecessary testing Dossier evaluation Substance evaluation Examine any information on a substance Check test proposals Compliance Output: Further information decisions Info to other parts of REACH/other legislation P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Authorisation AIM: Ensure risks from Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) are properly controlled or that they are substituted. SVHC (CMR, PBT, vPvB, ‘serious and irreversible effects’) Prioritised (progressively authorised as resources allow) each substance given individual deadline and use allowed until decision taken. Applicant to show: adequate control of risks if risks not all under control, evidence that social and economic benefits outweigh the risks Socio-economic authorisation - normally time-limited substitution plan considered DU can use suppliers authorisation Other M/I may get a letter of access to an authorisation

Authorisations are Risk based! Granting Commission shall grant an authorisation if the risks are adequately controlled as documented in the Chemical Safety Report If not, it may be granted if the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk and if there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies Authorisations are Risk based!

Restrictions Community wide concern MS/COM initiated 11/13/2018 Restrictions Safety net Community wide concern MS/COM initiated Fast track possible e.g. CMR substances for consumers Agency Committees examine: the risk, and the socio-economic aspects involved Commission - final decision through comitology Carry-over of existing restrictions (76/769/EEC) POPs P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

C and L Current legislation: REACH: Inventory 11/13/2018 C and L Current legislation: C&L all substances placed on market; some substances harmonised in Annex I of 67/548 REACH: Inventory managed by Agency contains C and L info for all marketed substances: no tonnage limit deadlines – 3 years supplied through registration or separately Industry co-operate to resolve differences in C&L EU harmonisation: CMRs respiratory sensitisers P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

C and L: GHS GHS not included in current proposal 11/13/2018 C and L: GHS GHS not included in current proposal Studies on differences and impact on down-stream legislation carried out Implementation foreseen next phase Proposal for a regulation either part of REACH or separate Will replace Directives 67/548 and 99/45 Inventory: managed by Agency contains C and L info for all marketed substances: no tonnage limit Deadlines – phase in deadlines industry co-operate to resolve differences in C&L EU harmonisation: CMRs respiratory sensitisers GHS – next phase P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Progress in decision-making 11/13/2018 Progress in decision-making Nov 2003: Proposal submitted to Parliament and Council Decision making in EP and Council: 2004-2006 Political agreement between MS: end 2005? Parliament 1st reading: October 2005? REACH in force: 2007? P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Key issues Prioritisation (Registration) Right balance Short/long term impacts 1-10 tonnes: Testing requirements OSOR Mandatory sharing of all data Workability of agreement Authorisation/substitution Agency Stronger role in evaluation Substances in Articles Balance between protection, workability and WTO concerns

Benefits (1): Economic and Strategic 11/13/2018 Benefits (1): Economic and Strategic Simplification Level playing-field for new and existing substances Improved innovation (encourage substitution, not forced) higher demand for safer substances higher registration thresholds (as compared to new substances) more R&D flexibility Better information through REACH will give enhanced implementation of current law e.g. Occupational Health Safety law Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control Water Framework Directive Waste legislation P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Benefits (2): Health benefits Illustrative Scenario (COM IA, 2003) respiratory and bladder cancers, skin and respiratory disorders Health benefits of € 50 billion (order of magnitude) UK Regulatory Impact Assessment 18 and 37 cancer death reduced per year →positive cost-benefit ratio of the regulation EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at work) Occupational skin diseases cost EU € 600 million / year (= 3 million lost wd)

Benefits (3): Environmental Benefits Examples: EC JRC: Pollution prevention Costs of dredging and clean-up contaminated soil/sewage sludge of at least €11 billion in the next decade for the EU15 alone (€11-110 billion) Nordic Council Costs associated to PCB pollution between €15 up to 75 billion (up to 2018) Finnish Ministry of Environment Remediation of contaminated soil future clean-up costs for Finland up to €1.2 billion in the next two decades. Benefits are difficult to estimate but significant and undisputed* * NL workshop on REACH IA

Less than 0.1 % of yearly turnover over 11 years 11/13/2018 Costs Impact Assessment: Direct costs: €2 billion (range €1.6 - 2.9 billion). Total costs (inc to downstream users): €2.8 - 3.6 billion Substance loss: 1-2% (to be further investigated) 60 % of direct costs from testing An indication of the amount of information industry has about its chemicals? Less than 0.1 % of yearly turnover over 11 years The knowledge gap REACH is designed to fill P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

Conclusion - REACH will ensure: 11/13/2018 Conclusion - REACH will ensure: High level of protection Burden of proof on those creating risks better use of resources Improved knowledge information for downstream users Improved innovation Substitution of dangerous substances particularly through authorisation Better: reaction to emerging risks consumer confidence Benefits significantly outweigh costs P:\10.14.8.1.1.013

for a Sustainable REACH Implementation Interim Strategy The interim strategy has 4 basic work elements: Aligning Dir. 67/548 and Reg. 793/93 with REACH - Re-focus Current Activities - Preparing for REACH Developing Guidance Documents and Software Tools for efficient, transparent and consistent implementation - Strategic Partnerships - Setting up the Agency “Working together, preparing for REACH” Finland: Practical aspects COM: Organisation The Interim Strategy prepares ALL stakeholders for a Sustainable REACH Implementation

Information Thank you! http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/chemicals/index.htm http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/index.htm