Student Services Report College Community School Board April 10, 2017

Special Education Stats 2015-2016 Year Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 10/2011 46 Nonresident 173 Resident Total: 219 49 nonresident 136 Resident Total: 185 48 nonresident 48 Resident Total: 96 500 10/2012 40 Nonresident 171 Resident Total: 211 44 Nonresident 139 Resident Total: 183 41 Nonresident 45 Resident Total: 86 480 10/2013 51 Nonresident 192 Resident Total: 243 33 Nonresident 120 Resident Total: 153 45 Nonresident 51 Resident 492 10/2014 42 Nonresident 200 Resident Total: 242 25 Non resident 118 Resident Total: 143 57 Nonresident Total: 108 493 10/2015 61 Nonresident 231 Resident Total: 292 24 Nonresident 117 Resident Total: 141 37 Nonresident 52 Resident Total: 89 522 10/2016 56 Nonresident 222 Resident Total: 278 27 Nonresident 131 Resident Total: 158 70 Resident Total: 115 551 These #’s include both resident and non-resident students that we were serving. Information gathered from Grant Wood Weighted Enrollment Detail and Tuition In rosters dated November 18, 2014 10/2015 #’s based on Linda’s rosters from October, 2015 10/2016 #’s based on GWAEA’s Tuition In and Weighted Enrollment Detail Reports

Special Education Teachers/Paras Total FTE Year Teachers/FTE Paras FTE Total # of Students 2011-2012 59 101.06 500 2012-2013 58 104.60 480 2013-2014 61 102.08 492 2014-2015 64 101.94 493 2015-2016 101.75 522 The teachers FTE can be pulled from the year’s rosters or the google doc “SE Teachers List”. The paras FTE is found on the Part C and B Personnel Positions Report. 2015-2016 Under Teachers/FTE don’t count Leah Gass at Edge but count Mary Mcwilliams at PHS.

Special Education – Stats 2015-2016 Number of Students Who Were Staffed into Special Education PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 10-11 35 11-12 55 12-13 48 13-14 29 14-15 50 15- 16 15 58 Download report from GWAEA (include both resident and non-resident students)

Special Education – Stats 2015-2016 Number of Students Exited from Special Education Services 2011-2012: 16 2012-2013: 22 2013-2014: 25 2014-2015: 14 2015-2016: 27 These are students who staffed out due to successful completion of IEP services. Information taken from SE Roster.

Special Ed Mobility Year New Students Drops Four Oaks District Heart of Iowa 2014/ 2015 104 78 2 131 65 2015/ 2016 125 66 6 102

% Proficient – IEP Green: Increased from previous year Red: Decreased from previous year Reading-IEP CCSD 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 4th 38.90% 42.90% 23.08% 24.56% 22.20% 19.10% 6th 25.00% 25.60% 15.00% 22.13% 32.40% 15.70% 8th 10.30% 28.80% 14.63% 13.43% 22.50% 26.90% 11th 41.30% 45.00% 28.57% 34.69% 41.90% 10.00% Math-IEP CCSD 14-15 50.10% 52.40% 35.90% 36.84% 42.20% 31.00% 37.50% 44.20% 27.50% 31.96% 32.00% 26.10% 26.83% 24.62% 57.14% 48.98% 35.50% 26.70% Revised See % proficient chart (sub group tab) New data is from state report card and CCSD pivot table We know we have gaps, this chart put our data in the context of the state. 7

High School Graduation Rate (%) IEP Group Comparison 2012 All 2012 IEP 2013 All 2013 IEP 2014 All 2014 IEP 2015 All 2015 IEP CCSD 87.63 48.48 92.13 71.88 94.37 79.31 94.6 83.3 Benton 90.58 60 90.48 62.50 90.32 40 97.4 80.0 Cedar Falls 95.87 84.44 96.13 83.64 97.18 80.85 95.8 79.1 Clear Creek 86.49 37.5 86.73 53.85 90.74 88.1 35.3 Cedar Rapids 82.8 62.31 80.92 59.07 85.02 71.72 84.0 72.0 Iowa City 89.03 52.48 87.90 51.69 90.39 63.64 93.2 75.3 Linn Mar 91.67 55.56 89.81 43.86 91.53 54.84 95.2 61.1 Marion 92.7 93.64 85 92.54 97.9 81.3 Muscatine 82 71.11 76.58 55.10 81.79 70 82.9 57.9 Waterloo 74.29 65.77 70.46 51.49 74.18 54.10 80.3 65.0 Waukee 98.01 86.67 98.65 93.55 98.06 92.86 98.4 88.9 Get this report from DE website. A to Z, look for graduation and dropout rate (Bookmarked). There are different reports. Find the one with sub group information.

Four Oaks Stats 2015-2016 Regular Education students admitted: 61 Special Education Students admitted: 63 Level 1 – 15 Level 2 – 5 Level 3 - 43 These #’s reflect students who were admitted to Four Oaks after the 13-14 school year.

Four Oaks Stats 2015-2016 Number of Four Oaks students by grade level that have been placed in the district K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 31 16 18 Includes both regular education and special education students

Four Oaks Student Placement by Building Four Oaks Stats 2015-2016 Four Oaks Student Placement by Building PHS Point Creek Heights Ridge View Crest Hill Edge 19 20 5 2 1 76

Support for Special Education Teachers: K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach Lindsay Spears K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach

K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach Curricular Support Research/obtain quality intervention materials to ensure: Alignment to the Iowa Core Vertical alignment across the district Professional learning & fidelity of implementation Plan and facilitate district-wide professional learning: Differentiated/choice sessions: Accessible Instructional Materials, Executive Functioning, Transition Planning, Literacy, IEP development, Read and Write for Google, Special Education law updates 95% Group (reading intervention materials available to teachers K-12)

K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach Coaching Support: IEP Development (Transition IEP compliance and peer review process) AT Usability Study (universal design, accessibility for all, selection of services/tools based on data, training provided to teachers and students) PLC Support (K-12): Coaching teachers’ and teams’ movement through the continuous improvement cycle (using data to make instructional decisions) Examining effectiveness of service delivery model in closing the achievement gap Supporting teachers’ ability to diagnose/intervene by providing coaching on diagnostic tools and interpretation of results Update: decoding vs comprehension at the secondary level → recent data showing growth with these interventions

SPEL Special Education Literacy • Model evidence-based instructional strategies • Assist teachers in analyzing data • Coach and collaborate with teachers to determine appropriate instructional strategies and materials

Growth Data Buildings Percent Making Growth GWAEA Goal #2---Increase the percentage of students who perform at the proficient level. Grant Wood AEA Priority: The learning gaps between students with IEPs and those without and for those students in disaggregated sub-groups will be reduced. Growth Data Buildings Percent Making Growth Percent Making Growth to Eliminate the Gap Crest, Heights, Hill, Ridge and View 100% 25%

ECSE Literacy Pilot Data

Questions??