TAP CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Advertisements

October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Providing Leaders with the Missing Link: Making Customer Information that is Linked to the Bottom Line Part of Leaders’ 360-Degree Feedback Jim Miller.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Open Forum Session 19.
©2012 THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY ADVISORY.COM Gaining Provider Feedback In February – March 2014, we administered a medical staff survey to employed &
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
SHAPE your School Mental Health System!
Employee Engagement Sample Results
Account Management Overview
Home Base Partnership Team
Transforming Administration Program
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
MINDING MEMBER MATTERS
2017 Winter Employee Engagement Survey
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Operational Reviews at the National Cemetery Administration (NCA)
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
GOAL 1: Defining Our Identity
Linking Communication Protocols
Club Excellence Mentor!
Identify stakeholders:
Preliminary Survey Results 10th Nodes Committee Meeting - Copenhagen
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
The Lycurgus Group: Instructional Effectiveness Survey System
Tracking Performance Data
Organizational Performance Self Assessments at DOI
SAMPLE Foster an Effective Feedback Environment
District Key 3.
Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine
Evaluating performance management
National PTA School of Excellence
Online Teaching Conference
UNIT-II TQM PRINCIPLES
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting
ATD: Year in Review and What to Expect in Year II
District Leadership Team
NYC Bar Diversity Benchmarking Research & Better Practices
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Chapter Management Program
Information Technology (IT)
EVC Accreditation Update Fall 2017 PDD Thursday, 3/31/17
Engagement Follow-up Resources
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
The Roadmap continues and looking at our next journey.
الجــودة الشاملة في مؤسسات التعليم العالي
Organizational Consulting
Strategic Planning for the Future
2015 Staff Engagement Survey
Engagement Follow-up Resources
North Iowa Community Action
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
EUPAN DG-Meeting Innovative Public Services Group (IPSG)
Building and Sustaining Total Quality Organizations
Identify stakeholders:
National PTA School of Excellence
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Kuali Research Organizational Change Management
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Prizmah Day School Conference March 2019
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction
Butler County JVS: Performance Driven
Metrics That Work for You
CREATING A STRATEGY FOCUSED ORGANIZATION
Presentation transcript:

TAP CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY CONTACTS LuAnn Stokke stoke@uw.edu Tyler DuLam dulam@uw.edu Jason Kalivas kalivas@uw.edu CELEBRATE SUCCESS AND FOSTER CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REPORTING MARCH Overall and unit-level response rates Responder demographics Report samples Timeline APRIL Service-area and unit-Level reports Verbatim analyses Benchmarking Accountability and improvement toolkit DATA-DRIVEN CHANGE IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES RESPONSE PLANNING, GOAL SETTING PROJECT AND PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION AND RECOGNITION FOR ACTIONS TAKEN REDEFINE SURVEY QUESTIONS Step 1 Deploy survey and obtain feedback (ratings and comments) Step 2 Identify themes and opportunities Step 3 Opportunities to Action; Develop and implement action plans and set goals (share with team and Sr. Leadership) Step 4 Follow up and assess performance and impact of action plans Step 5 Did changes result in goal attainment? Communicate impact and share results with Senior Leadership Step 6 Realign with strategic goals and/or course correct 94 SERVICES GOALS Assess baseline customer satisfaction with administrative services at UW, including UW Bothell, Tacoma, and Seattle, through an initial survey Provide data to celebrate successes and help share best practices Provide data to help Administrative Units focus improvement efforts Evaluate changes in customer satisfaction over time by administering survey on a regular basis and reporting the results 7 KEY QUESTIONS PARTICIPANTS 3 University of Washington campuses 3 Organizational Excellence Supporters 13 Survey Team Members 28 Vice President- and Vice Chancellor- lead administrative units 4,000+ survey responders

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY CONTACTS LuAnn Stokke stoke@uw.edu Tyler DuLam dulam@uw.edu Jason Kalivas kalivas@uw.edu CELEBRATE SUCCESS AND FOSTER CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT GOALS Assess baseline customer satisfaction with administrative services at UW, including UW Bothell, Tacoma, and Seattle, through an initial survey Provide data to celebrate successes and help share best practices Provide data to help Administrative Units focus improvement efforts Evaluate changes in customer satisfaction over time by administering survey on a regular basis and reporting the results 94 SERVICES PARTICIPANTS 3 University of Washington campuses 3 Organizational Excellence Supporters 13 Survey Team Members 28 Vice President- and Vice Chancellor- lead administrative units 4,000+ survey responders 7 KEY QUESTIONS REPORTING MARCH Overall and unit-level response rates Responder demographics Report samples Timeline APRIL Service-area and unit-Level reports Verbatim analyses Benchmarking Accountability and improvement toolkit