QUALITY BY DESIGN Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop Washington D.C. September 27-29, 2006
Advertisements

Stability Studies - Evaluation of Outcomes and Development of Documentation For Regulatory Submissions Bob Seevers.
Finished Pharmaceutical Product Specifications
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Quality by Design (QbD) in Product Development
Implementation of Quality-by-Design: ONDQA Initiatives Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5, 2006 Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Deputy Director.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
By: Muhammad Naeem Quality Assurance and Regulatory Manager
VINOD P. SHAH, PH.D. SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Pharmacy.
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
Ray Scherzer FDA ACPS October 26, 2005 Breaking with Tradition: The Manufacturing Challenges Ahead!
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
PAT Validation Working Group Process and Analytical Validation Working Group Arthur H. Kibbe, Ph.D. Chair June 13, 2002.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Learnings from Pre-approval Joint Inspection of a GSK QbD Product with US-FDA & EMA and the application of Continuous Verification 17 May 2011, Beijing,
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
Quality By Design and Dissolution PhRMA 10/25/05
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10.
Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Andrea Pranti.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Slide 1 May 2008 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008 QUALITY BY DESIGN.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
D. Christopher Watts, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA Science Seminar Series for the Office of Commissioner April 9, 2004 Process Analytical.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
Quality by Design (QbD) Myth : An expensive development tool ! Fact : A tool that makes product development and commercial scale manufacturing simple !
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Important informations
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
1 An Update on ICH Guideline Q8 – Pharmaceutical Development FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science: 5 Oct 2006 Dr John C Berridge Senior Regulatory.
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10.
BioTx Pharmaceutical Sciences Movement within the design space with a robust control strategy Jon Coffman, Ph.D. Principal Engineer III BioTherapeutic.
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
1 Office of Pharmaceutical Science on Jon Clark FDA/CDER/OPS Associate Director for Policy Development.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Second Meeting of the FDA/ACPS Process Analytical Technology: Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
开发报批美国 FDA 的仿制药 与相关问题探讨 上海复星普适医药科技有限公司何平. 内容提要 开发仿制药的重要性和机遇 开发仿制药的重要性和机遇 开发仿制药的挑战 开发仿制药的挑战 申报仿制药的分类 申报仿制药的分类 仿制药研发团队 仿制药研发团队 仿制药的研发过程 仿制药的研发过程 QbD 在制剂开发中怎么体现.
QbD Technologies: Workshop for Risks Management Incorporating Risk Management for Technology Transfer.
Product & Process Working Group February 26, 2002.
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY – A REVIEW By Mr. Akash Mali DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS, G.I.P.E.R., LIMB, SATARA. 1.
Michael Kopcha, Ph.D., R.Ph. Director Office of Pharmaceutical Quality
An Update on ICH Guideline – Pharmaceutical Development
Quality by design (Qbd)
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Quality Risk Management
Quality System.
Dr Dehghan M. H Professor in Pharmaceutics,
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Quality by Design.
SID & GP MINPROMTORG OF RUSSIA Corporate Communication Center
Presentation transcript:

QUALITY BY DESIGN Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008

World Health Organization 13 November, 2018 QUALITY BY DESIGN Dr Tom Sam President Industrial Pharmacy Section International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)

QUALITY BY DESIGN products processes

What is Quality? Quality Patient Requirements = need or expectations Target Product Quality Profile Patient (or surrogate) “Good pharmaceutical quality represents an acceptably low risk of failing to achieve the desired clinical attributes.”

Which quality do we want for our medicines ? 6σ Source: Motorola, Air Safety Online

With which quality do we manufacture our medicines: 6σ, 5σ, 4σ, 3σ, 2σ ? Source: Motorola, Air Safety Online Current Mfg Quality provided to patients

How do we fill this quality gap in the pharmaceutical industry? Sigma ppm Defects Yield 2 s 3 4 5 6 308,537 66,807 6,210 233 3.4 69.2% 93.3% 99.4% 99.98% 99.99966% Cost of Quality 25-35% 20-25% 12-18% 4-8% 1-3% Current Mfg Quality provided to patients ……by testing !!!! Data from: Dr. Doug Dean & Frances Bruttin PriceWaterhouseCoopers

The quality mantra “Quality can not be tested into products; it has to be built in by design”

How can we modernize our industry? More knowledge of our products and processes, allowing better design and more control Better management: - introduction of quality risk management - expansion of GMP to more extensive pharmaceutical quality system

Dr Ajaz Hussain ‘Pharmaceutical GMPs for the 21st Century’

The knowledge pyramid Desired State Current State First Principles Why? Knowledge based decisions Desired State MECHANISTIC KNOWLEDGE How? “CAUSAL" KNOWLEDGE What “Causes” What? Need for regulatory oversight CORRELATIVE KNOWLEDGE What Is Correlated to What? Current State DESCRIPTIVE KNOWLEDGE: What?

The New Quality Paradigm – The Evolving Regulatory Framework ICH Q8/Q8(R) - Pharmaceutical Development PAT Guidance ICH Q9 – Quality Risk Management ICH Q10 – Pharmaceutical Quality Systems Product Design Process Scale-up & Transfer Commercial Manufacture Product Life Cycle

Definition: Quality by Design Quality by Design is a systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes - product and process understanding - and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management. EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007

Quality by Design approach can be used for Simple dosage forms Advanced drug delivery systems Devices Combination products (e.g. theranostics) Active pharmaceutical ingredients Materials incl excipients Analytics

Impact of QbD Companies re-organize their science Universities change their curriculum Health authorities change their assessment and inspection

QUALITY BY DESIGN Step 1. Agree on the Target Product Profile Step 2. Determine the Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) Step 3. Link the drug and excipient attributes and the process parameters to the CQAs Step 4. Define the Design Space Step 5. Define the Control Strategy Step 6. Prepare QbD registration file Step 7. Product lifecycle management and continual improvement EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

Step 1. Agree on the Target Product Profile Consider: dosage form route of administration strength release / delivery of the drug pharmacokinetic characteristics (e.g., dissolution; aerodynamic performance) drug product quality criteria (e.g., sterility, purity). Target Product Profile: - a prospective and dynamic summary of the quality characteristics of a drug product - that ideally will be achieved to ensure that the desired quality, and hence the safety and efficacy, of a drug product is realised. The TPP forms the basis of design of the product.

TPP for paediatric dosage form TPP adult TPP paediatric (may depend upon age group)

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES - definition A critical quality attribute (CQA) is a - physical, chemical, biological, or microbiological property or characteristic - that should be within an appropriate limit, range, or distribution - to ensure the desired product quality. EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007

Step 2. Determine the Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) Drug product CQAs are used to guide the product and process development. solid oral dosage forms: typically those aspects affecting - product purity - product potency - product stability - drug release. other delivery systems: can additionally include more product specific aspects, such as - aerodynamic properties for inhaled products - sterility for parenterals, - adhesive force for transdermal patches.

Product-centric Quality by Design API Purity Chemical purity Physical form Raw Material quality Excipient Quality Attributes DRUG PRODUCT API Quality Attributes Formulation Parameters Formulation Process Related Particle size Mechanical Properties Excipient Compatibility

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

Step 3. Link the drug and excipient attributes and the process parameters to the CQAs People Quality Attributes Inputs to the process control variability of the Output I N P U T S (X) Equipment y = ƒ(x) Measurement y Process OUTPUT Materials Source: Moheb Nasr, FDA Environment

P2 might not be needed in the establishment of design space Mapping the Linkage Inputs: Outputs: M1 CQA1 Critical Quality Attributes M2 CQA2 Material Attributes CQA3 P1 P2 Relationships: CQA1 = function (M1) CQA2 = function (P1, P3) CQA3 = function (M1, M2, P1) P2 might not be needed in the establishment of design space Source: Moheb Nasr, FDA P3 Process Parameters

Experimental Approach for Identifying Parameters Design of Experiments (DOE) is an efficient method to determine relevant parameters and interactions 2. Conduct randomized experiments 1. Choose experimental design (e.g., full factorial, d-optimal) Experiment Factor A Factor B Factor C 1 + - 2 3 4 3. Analyze Data Determine significant factors

ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management 4. Risk Review 1. Risk Assessment 2. Risk Control Initiate Quality Risk Management Process Output / Result of the Quality Risk Management Process Formal Risk Management Process The new language

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

Step 4. Define the Design Space The linkage between - the process inputs (input variables and process parameters) and - the critical quality attributes can be described in the design space.

Definition of Design Space The material attributes and process parameters that assure quality. The multidimensional combination and interaction of input variables (e.g. material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality. Roll pressure Gap width Screen Size

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

Design Space 1a Contour plot of in-vitro release EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007 Response surface plot of in-vitro release as a function of two critical parameters of the mixing and lamination process. Contour plot of in-vitro release

Design Space Design Space Knowledge Space Control Space

Step 5. Define the Control Strategy The control strategy should describe and justify how in-process controls and the controls of - input materials (drug substance and excipients), - container closure system, - intermediates and the controls of end products contribute to the final product quality

5. CONTROL STRATEGY Elements of a control strategy can include, but are not limited to, the following: • Control of input material attributes (e.g., drug substance, adhesive polymer, primary packaging materials) based on an understanding of their impact on processability or product quality • Product specification(s) • Controls for unit operations that have an impact on downstream processing or end-product quality (e.g., the impact of solvent on degradation) • In-process or real-time release in lieu of end-product testing • A monitoring program (e.g., full product testing at regular intervals) for verifying multivariate prediction models.

What are the steps in a Quality by Design approach? 2. CRITICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES 3. LINK MAs AND PPs TO CQAS 1. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE 4. ESTABLISH DESIGN SPACE 6. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MNGMNT 5. ESTABLISH CONTROL STRATEGY

Step 7. Product lifecycle management continual improvement Minimal Approach QbD Approach • Reactive (i.e., problem solving and corrective action) • Preventive action • Continual improvement facilitated

Better processes will lead to products with less variability Now (GMP) Variable Input Fixed Process Variable Output Drug Product PAT/QbD Variable Input Adapted Process Consistent Output

The Revolution in Quality Thinking Quality by Testing and Inspection Enhanced product knowledge process understanding Quality by Design quality assured by well designed product & process