Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INWEPF 4th Steering Meeting and Symposium (5-7 July 2007)
Advertisements

AP Review Terrestrial & Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity.
Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? Biodiversity! 1,000,000 5th Grade Topic 1 5th Grade Topic 2 4th Grade Topic 3.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
2 April, InVEST Introductory Seminar, Bangkok
TEEB Training Session 1: Analysing value ©TEEB. TEEB Training  Missing and imperfect markets –The quality and the extent of natural spaces affects our.
The U.S. Experience With Land Retirement for Natural Resource Conservation Ralph E. Heimlich Deputy Director for Analysis, Resource Economics Division,
Environmental of Impacts
 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th.
The Economics of Global Climate Change Figures and Tables
Conclusions: Diversity and Ecosystem Function
Evaluating the environment Gauri-Shankar Guha. Dr. Gauri-Shankar Guha ASU - Econ Evaluating the Environment For the individual, economic values.
Professor John Agard UWI Environment in Development.
 Homework #8 due Next Thursday  Group Outline due Nov. 11 (next Thurs.)
 Timber, wood fiber, fuel wood  Gas regulation and climate control  Carbon sequestration  Watershed services (water supply and quality)  Clean air.
Total Economics of Sustainable Land Management Jonathan Davies Global Drylands Programme.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Valuation Discussion: Motivation, Concepts and Methods Emily McKenzie and Shan Ma.
The Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources, 3e By James R. Kahn © 2005 South-Western, part of the Thomson Corporation.
Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis: Using Market Prices
NICK HANLEY UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING Valuing cultural heritage using methods from environmental economics.
The Economics of Global Climate Change Figures and Tables By Jonathan M. Harris and Brian Roach Copyright © 2007 Jonathan M. Harris.
6. Values and externalities Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Ecosystem Valuation Social and Environmental Aspects Kathryn Benson CE 397 November 25, 2003.
Outline of presentation Travel cost method – concept, example, assumptions Consumer surplus related to TCM Visitor’s table Demand curve Concerns regarding.
Ecosystem Valuation Ecosystem Valuation ES 100: November 17 th, 2006 “We have estimated the current economic value of 17 ecosystem services for 16 biomes,
UZAIR KAMAL Mohsin Murad MAJID KHAN. Major Power Project Of The Country 92 miles downstream the confluence of Kabul and Indus Rivers 260 ft high structure.
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 2 nd ed. Jonathan M. Harris Data Updates for 2008 Copyright © 2008 Jonathan M. Harris.
Aquatic Biodiversity. Chapter Overview Questions What are the basic types of aquatic life zones and what factors influence the kinds of life they contain?
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods.
WWF Greater Mekong Programme InVEST Seminar – April 2012 Ecosystem Services in the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Economic Valuation of Environment: Overview
Lecture 8 Social Regulation. Correction of market failures, not dealing with the natural monopoly problem Regulation of health, safety, environment, public.
3.1.1 Biodiversity. Biodiversity  A measure of the biological richness of an area taking into account the number of species, community complexity and.
Bell Work Define what you think an indicator is.
Preferences for Coral Reef and Fishery Management in Okinawa, Japan
LECTURE PLAN UNIT UNITNO ECOSYSTEM NATURAL RESOURCES
Investing in Natural Capital
Valuing the Environment: Concepts
A Quick Intro to Non-Market Valuation
Looking to the Future : Environment and Energy
Colleen Carroll University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Cities and sustainability
The Greening of the Rooftop
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Copyright © 2013 Jonathan M. Harris
Copyright © 2013 Jonathan M. Harris
The Economics of Global Climate Change Figures and tables
The Economics of Global Climate Change Figures and tables
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
The Economics of Global Climate Change Figures and Tables
Chapter Six: Welfare Analysis.
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Diversity.
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Ecosystem Services.
Copyright © 2013 Jonathan M. Harris
Return to Home Page GEOG 370 May 5,
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Chapter 9 Revisiting the Ecosystem Concept: Important Features That Promote Generality and Understanding © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From.
Chul-Oh Shin · Won-Keun Chang Korea Maritime Institute
Presentation transcript:

Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M. Harris and Brian Roach Chapter 6 – Valuing the Environment Copyright © 2013 Jonathan M. Harris

Figure 6.1: Components of Total Economic Value Use Values Non-use Values Direct Use Value Indirect Use Value Option Value Bequest Value Existence Value Total economic value is composed of both use and non-use values. • Timber • Non-timber products • Hiking • Hunting • Soil erosion control • Flood protection • Carbon storage • Future recreation • Potential pharma- ceuticals • Forest available for future generations • Welfare from just knowing forest exists

Table 6.1: Sample of Recent Environmental Contingent Valuation Results Good or Service Valued WTP Dollars Reduced highway noise and air pollution in Spain1 $22/year Increased biodiversity in Hungary2 $23–$69/year Increased supplies of renewable energy in the United States3 $10–$27/month Urban greening in China4 $20–$29/year Increased forest reserves in Norway5 $261–$303 (one-time payment) Clean drinking water supplies in Pakistan6 $7–$9/month Grassland conservation in Italy7 $11–$19/year Marine biodiversity in the islands8 $121–$837 (one-time payment) River recreation in Australia9 $113/day Contingent valuation gives a range of estimates for various non-marketed goods. Sources: 1. Lera-Lopez et al., 2012; 2. Szabo, 2011; 3. Mozumder et al., 2011; 4. Chen and Jim 2011; 5. Lindhjem and Navrud, 2011; 6. Akram and Olmstead, 2011; 7. Marzetti et al., 2011; 8. Ressurreicao et al., 2011; 9. Rolfe and Dyack, 2010. Note: WTP = willing to pay.

Table 6.2: Present Value of a $100 Impact, by Discount Rate Years Discount Rate 1% 3% 5% 7% 10% $100.00 10 $90.53 $74.41 $61.39 $50.83 $38.55 20 $81.95 $55.37 $37.69 $25.84 $14.86 30 $74.19 $41.20 $23.14 $13.14 $5.73 50 $60.80 $22.81 $8.72 $3.39 $0.85 100 $36.97 $5.20 $0.76 $0.12 $0.01 Present values of future costs and benefits decline rapidly at higher discount rates.

Figure 6.2: Present Value of a $100 Impact, by Discount Rate At discount rates above 3%, costs that are 50 to 100 years in the future are discounted almost to insignificance.

Table 6.3: Hypothetical Example of Risk Analysis Scenario Net Benefit Probability Expected Value Low precipitation + $5 million 0.27 + 1,350,000 Average precipitation + $10 million 0.49 + 4,900,000 High precipitation + $20 million 0.23 + 4,600,000 Extremely high precipitation – $100 million 0.01 – 1,000,000 Total expected value + 9,850,000 Expected value takes into account the probabilities of different possible outcomes.

Table 6.4: Potential Costs and Benefits Associated with Dam Construction Proposal Potential Benefits 1. Construction costs 1. Flood control 2. Operations and maintenance costs 2. Recreation 3. Environmental damages 3. Hydropower supply 4. Risk of dam failure Costs of dam construction include construction and operations, as well as environmental and potential catastrophic costs. Benefits can include flood control, hydropower, and recreation.

Table 6.5: Annual Present Value of Costs and Benefits of Dam Construction Proposal (in Millions), Selected Years Costs Benefits Year Construction Operations Environmental Dam Failure Recreation Hydropower Flood Control 50.00 0.00 1 47.62 2 45.35 3 6.91 8.64 0.43 12.96 4.32 7.77 4 6.58 8.23 0.41 12.34 4.11 7.40 5 6.27 7.84 0.39 11.75 3.92 7.05 … 49 0.73 0.92 0.05 1.37 0.46 0.82 50 0.70 0.87 0.04 1.31 0.44 0.78 51 0.66 0.83 1.25 0.42 0.75 52 0.63 0.79 1.19 0.40 0.71 Total Present Value 142.97 132.47 165.59 8.28 248.38 82.79 149.03 Costs and benefits for future years need to be discounted to calculate total present value.

Area (millions of hectares) Annual value (1994 $ billions) Table 6.6: The Global Value of Ecosystem Services Biome (ecosystem) Area (millions of hectares) Annual value (1994 $ billions) Open ocean 33,220 8,381 Estuaries 180 4,110 Seagrass/algae beds 200 3,801 Coral reefs 62 375 Shelf 2,660 4,283 Tropical forest 1,900 3,813 Temperate/boreal forest 2,955 894 Grass/rangelands 3,898 906 Tidal marsh/mangroves 165 1,648 Swamps/floodplains 3,231 Lakes/rivers 1,700 Desert 1,925 NA1 Tundra 743 Ice/rock 1,640 Cropland 1,400 128 Urban 332 Total 51,645 33,268 Values for the total global ecosystem are somewhat speculative, but add to $33 trillion in total.

Figure A6.1: Total Cost Demand Curve Example Results of a travel cost study can be used to construct a demand curve and obtain an estimate of total consumer surplus.

Figure A6.2: Contingent Valuation Question Formats Open-Ended Format: What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay annually, as a tax surcharge, to fund a wetlands protection program? Payment Card Format: Which of the amounts below most closely indicates your maximum willingness to pay annually, as a tax surcharge, for a wetlands protection program? Please circle your answer. $5 $40 $80 $200 $750 $10 $50 $100 $300 $1000 $20 $60 $125 $400 $1500 $30 $75 $150 $500 $2000 Single-Bounded Format: Would you be willing to pay $75 annually, as a tax surcharge, to fund a wetlands protection program? Yes No Unsure Double-Bounded Format: If respondent answers “Yes,” then ask: “Would you be willing to pay $150?” If respondent answers “No,” then ask: “Would you be willing to pay $40?” Multiple-Bounded Format: For each dollar amount below, indicate whether you would be willing to pay that amount annually, as a tax surcharge, to fund a wetlands protection program? $5 Yes No Unsure $10 Yes No Unsure $25 Yes No Unsure $50 Yes No Unsure $75 Yes No Unsure $100 Yes No Unsure $200 Yes No Unsure $300 Yes No Unsure $500 Yes No Unsure $1000 Yes No Unsure Different formats are possible for contingent valuation surveys.