ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events Jane Armitage on behalf of the THRIVE Collaborative Group Financial Disclosure:
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Women's Health Study: Low-Dose Aspirin in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Dr.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
The AURORA Trial Source: Holdaas H, Holme I, Schmieder RE, et al. Rosuvastatin in diabetic hemodialysis patient. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(7):1335–1341.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Martin Landray and Louise Bowman on.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis  Stavros Stavrakis, MD  The American Journal.
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial Marc P. Bonaca, Patrice.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
POISE-2 PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials 
P2Y12 blockade versus placebo; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
Figure 1 Relationships between magnitude of antithrombotic benefit vs
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
The results of the SHARP trial
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
Prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial.
Presentation transcript:

ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage and Louise Bowman on behalf of the ASCEND Study Collaborative Group Funded by British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council and support from Abbott, Bayer, Mylan and Solvay Designed, conducted and analysed independently of the funders University of Oxford is the trial sponsor

Background Aspirin and cardiovascular disease Aspirin use is well established in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease Diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk but it is unclear whether aspirin should be routinely prescribed to prevent a first cardiovascular event Aspirin and cancer Post-hoc analyses of selected randomized trials of aspirin suggest reductions in the risk of cancer, particularly gastrointestinal cancers, with effects apparent after about 3 years ESC guidance 2016 Cautious about aspirin use: “… antiplatelet therapy for primary prevention may be considered in high risk patients with DM on an individual basis”. EUROASPIRE lll 2010 28% with diabetes (asymptomatic) taking aspirin (Kotseva et al 2010)

ASCEND trial design Eligibility: Age ≥ 40 years, any DIABETES and no baseline cardiovascular disease Participants: 15,480 UK patients Factorial randomization: Aspirin 100 mg daily vs placebo (& to omega-3 fatty acid supplements vs placebo) Follow-up: Mean 7.4 years, >99% complete for morbidity and mortality Adherence: Average difference in anti-platelet use between groups 69% ASCEND Study Collaborative Group. Am Heart J 2018;198:135-144

Baseline demographics (N=15,480) Characteristic Aspirin Placebo Age, years 63 Male 63% Type 2 diabetes 94% Diabetes duration, median years 7 Hypertension 62% Statin use 76% 75% Body Mass Index, kg/m2 31 Glycated haemoglobin, mmol/mol 55 (7.2%)

Key outcomes Primary efficacy outcome: Serious Vascular Event (SVE) Non-fatal myocardial infarction, Non-haemorrhagic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, or Cardiovascular death, excluding any intracranial haemorrhage Primary safety outcome: Major bleed Intra-cranial haemorrhage, Sight-threatening eye bleed, Serious gastrointestinal bleed, or Other serious bleed Key secondary outcomes: i) SVE or any revascularization (pre-specified for subgroup analyses) ii) Gastrointestinal tract cancer

Effect of aspirin on cancer Placebo Rate Ratio Gastrointestinal tract 157 (2.0%) 158 0.99 (0.80-1.24) Other gastrointestinal* 87 (1.1%) 82 1.06 (0.78-1.43) Respiratory 101 (1.3%) 103 0.98 (0.74-1.29) Genitourinary 332 (4.3%) 294 (3.8%) 1.13 (0.97-1.32) Haematological 88 86 1.02 (0.76-1.38) Breast 97 96 (1.2%) 1.01 (0.76-1.34) Melanoma skin 50 (0.6%) 59 (0.8%) 0.85 (0.58-1.23) Any cancer 897 (11.6%) 887 (11.5%) 1.01 (0.92-1.11) * Hepatobiliary and pancreas

Effect of aspirin on Serious Vascular Events 20 Aspirin 658 (8.5%) Placebo 743 (9.6%) 15 Rate ratio 0.88 (0.79-0.97) P=0.01 Placebo Participants with Event (%) 10 Aspirin 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Years of Follow-up

plus revascularization Components of the primary efficacy outcome Aspirin Placebo Type of Event (N=7740) (N=7740) Rate Ratio (95% CI) no. of participants with events (%) Vascular outcomes Non-fatal myocardial infarction 191 (2.5) 195 (2.5) Non-fatal presumed ischaemic stroke 202 (2.6) 229 (3.0) Vascular death excl. intracranial haemorrhage 197 (2.5) 217 (2.8) Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) 168 (2.2) 197 (2.5) Any serious vascular event 658 (8.5) 743 (9.6) 0.88 (0.79–0.97) P = 0.01 Any arterial revascularization 340 (4.4) 384 (5.0) Any serious vascular event or revascularization 833 (10.8) 936 (12.1) 0.88 (0.80–0.97) P = 0.01 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Aspirin Better Placebo Better

Effects of aspirin assignment on SVE or revascularization in different types of participant Aspirin Placebo (N=7740) (N=7740) Rate Ratio (95% CI) Baseline Characteristic no. of participants with events (%) Sex Men 573 (11.8) 658 (13.6) 0.86 (0.77–0.96) Women 260 (9.0) 278 (9.6) 0.92 (0.78–1.09) Weight at randomization (kg) <70 118 (13.1) 108 (11.4) 1.17 (0.90–1.52) ≥70 694 (10.4) 812 (12.3) 0.83 (0.75–0.92) 5-year vascular risk <5% 179 (5.7) 208 (6.6) 0.86 (0.71–1.05) ≥5% <10% 384 (11.7) 431 (13.2) 0.86 (0.75–0.99) ≥10% 270 (20.5) 297 (22.0) 0.94 (0.80–1.11) All 833 (10.8) 936 (12.1) 0.88 (0.80–0.97) 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Aspirin Better Placebo Better

Effect of aspirin on major bleed Aspirin Placebo Absolute Type of Event (N=7740) (N=7740) Rate Ratio (95% CI) Difference (%) no. of participants with events (%) Major bleed Intracranial hemorrhage 55 (0.7) 45 (0.6) 0.1 Sight threatening eye bleed 57 (0.7) 64 (0.8) -0.1 Serious gastrointestinal hemorrhage 137 (1.8) 101 (1.3) 0.5 Other major bleed 74 (1.0) 43 (0.6) 0.4 Any major bleed 314 (4.1) 245 (3.2) 1.29 (1.09–1.52) 0.9 P = 0.003 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 Aspirin Better Placebo Better

Observed effects per 5000 person years of aspirin by vascular risk SVE/revasc Bleed SVE/revasc Bleed Less: 6 ± 4 More: 3 ± 3 Less: 11 ± 14 More: 10 ± 8 SVE/revasc Bleed Less: 13 ± 6 More: 9 ± 3 ± = Standard Error

Summary Aspirin did not reduce the risk of gastrointestinal or any other cancer with no apparent effect emerging with longer follow-up Aspirin significantly reduced the risk of serious vascular events but also significantly increased the risk of major bleeding The absolute benefits from avoiding serious vascular events were largely counterbalanced by the increased risk of bleeding There was no group in which the benefits clearly outweighed the risks