CHESTNUT BREEDING PROGRAM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A SSESSING THE IMPACT OF FOREST FIRES IN MARITIME PINE STANDS Botequim, B 1., Borges, J. G. 1, Garcia-Gonzalo, J. 1, Marques S. 1, Oliveira, M.M. 2, Silva,
Advertisements

Identification of AFLP markers linked to tomato spotted wilt virus resistance in tobacco NC STATE UNIVERSITY H. Moon and J.S. Nicholson Department of Crop.
Potato Mapping / QTLs Amir Moarefi VCR
Resistance to powdery mildew in wheat germplasm with different resistance sources L. M. Miranda, J. P. Murphy, D. S. Marshall and S.Leath NC STATE UNIVERSITY.
Identification of markers linked to Selenium tolerance genes
Biotechnology - Using an organism to make a product, …or using advanced methods to study an organism GMO - Genetically Modified Organism Transgenic - describing.
Exploiting Next Generation Sequencing to investigate the genetics of parsnip root disease and develop a marker assisted breeding strategy Lauren Chappell.
Breeding and Genetics Tools Dr. Brent Hulke Research Geneticist.
Brian Ellis Biotechnology Laboratory - UBC May 02, 2001.
INTRODUCTION In natural conditions plants are continuously exposed to number of pathogens both biotrophs and necrotrophs. Plants respond to invading fungi.
Insertional mutagenesis in zebrafish rapidly identifies genes essential for early vertebrate development By Golling et. al Presented by: Pam Lincoln.
Fibre properties that affect paper quality Strength –Microfibril length/thickness –Hydrogen bonding between microfibrils and other cell wall constituents.
Why microarrays in a bioinformatics class? Design of chips Quantitation of signals Integration of the data Extraction of groups of genes with linked expression.
Paola CASTAGNOLI Maria FOTI Microarrays. Applicazioni nella genomica funzionale e nel genotyping DIPARTIMENTO DI BIOTECNOLOGIE E BIOSCIENZE.
Breeding Resistance to Chestnut Blight Canadian Chestnut Council.
ARC Biotechnology Platform: Sequencing for Game Genomics Dr Jasper Rees
Eucalyptus Pine Pathogen Interactions. Introduction Forest trees – Long – lived – Exposed to array of pathogens – Do not posses adaptive immunity Innate.
Natural Variation in Arabidopsis ecotypes. Using natural variation to understand diversity Correlation of phenotype with environment (selective pressure?)
The American Chestnut Foundation’s Breeding Program for Blight Resistance Frederick V. Hebard, William Y. C. White & Shawn Yarnes Meadowview Research Farms.
1 Building Communities Around Ontology Development Pankaj Jaiswal Dept. of Plant Breeding and Genetics Cornell University Ithaca, NY FAO,
Forest Health Initiative: A Model for Rapid Response to Emerging Pests C. Dana Nelson, Project Leader/Research Geneticist Southern.
1 International Consultation on Pro-poor Jatropha Development, Rome, Apr 08HY Genetic Markers for Jatropha Biodiversity Evaluation and Breeding Introduction.
BREEDING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY. Breeding? Application of genetics principles for improvement Application of genetics principles for improvement “Accelerated”
© 2010 by The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. 1 The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK, 73401, USA 2 National Center.
Introduction of Pathology
DECIPHERING THE EARLY BOVINE HOST RESPONSE AFTER Brucella melitensis INFECTION ROSSETTI CA 1 * DRAKE K 2, LAWHON S 3, NUNES J 3, GULL T 3, KHARE S 3, EVERTS.
Chestnut Blight A Case in Introduced Disease,
Margaret Pooler USDA/ARS U.S. National Arboretum Washington, D.C.
Cosegregation of CAPS with Disease Phenotypes in Barley Abstract This project was designed to identify cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers.
GENETIC ENGINEERING. What does something that has been genetically engineered mean?
Presenter Name Date Presentation Title. Title HEADER Bullet Point.
Modern Breeding Methods Apart from the conventional plant breeding, we also have non- conventional. These non- conventional methods are called Modern Breeding.
Comparative mapping of Brassica oleracea using sequence-based markers derived from other Brassica relatives and transcriptome sequences generated from.
Fusarium-Induced Shoot Elongation Correlates with Seedling Lodging Rate and Root Reduction Natural Variation in Fusarium-Induced Morphological Changes.
Jinkwan Jo1, Jelli Venkatesh1, Koeun Han1 and Byoung-Cheorl Kang1*
Presentation Title Presenter Name Date.
Complex Genomic Trait Predictions to Accelerate Plant Breeding Programs Kelci Miclaus1, Luciano da Costa e Silva1 , and Lauro Jose Moreira Guimaraes2.
Conclusions and future work
Natural Variation and the Genetic Basis of
EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL IN VIVO GENOTOXICITY OF QUERCETIN
Whole Genome Sequencing of Brucella melitensis Isolates for the Identification of Biovar, Variants and Relationship within a Biovar *Shaheed F [1], Habibi.
N. S. Sekora, K. S. Lawrence, J. A. McInroy
BIOL 433 Plant Genetics Term 2,
A VIRULENT NEW TURNIP MOSAIC VIRUS (TuMV) STRAIN THAT BREAKS ALL TuMV
Integrases target elements for DNA inversion resulting gene regulation in plant protoplasts Cíntia Marques Coelho1,2, Mayna da Silveira Gomide1,2, Lara.
BRC Science Highlight Dynamics of gene expression during development and expansion of vegetative stem internodes of bioenergy sorghum Objective Conduct.
Races distribution of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis in Algeria and consequences of new virulence type identification in some basis of P. tritici-repentis.
Exploiting the combination of natural and genetically engineered resistance to viruses impacting cassava production in Africa.
Quantitative traits Lecture 13 By Ms. Shumaila Azam
Tyr Wiesner-Hanks December 12, 2014
Kayla Rayford1, Dave Anderson2, Jeneva Anderson2, Karen Guillemin2
BREEDING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
13-1 Genetic Engineering.
Do RPA-dependent epigenetic modifications regulate early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana? Emily Berry and Kevin Culligan Department of Molecular ,Cellular.
Centre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics
Pinus pinaster Aiton. Pinus pinea L.
With Genetic Analyzers from Applied Biosystems
Bioinformatics for plant biosecurity and surveillance systems
BREEDING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
BIOL 433 Plant Genetics Term 2,
S. Savocchia, R. Billones-Baaijens, A. Cimmino, A. Evidente
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Future Directions in RRD Research
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
BTG 461 Bioresources Mgt What is plant breeding?
Alisdair R. Fernie, Jianbing Yan  Molecular Plant 
Schematic representation of a transcriptomic evaluation approach.
C. Trapero. 1, J. Romero1, B. Koopmann2, P. Karlovsky2, A
Mapping of srt1 by BSA-seq.
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Presentation transcript:

CHESTNUT BREEDING PROGRAM Castanea spp. responses to Phytophthora cinnamomi: towards new approaches to unravel the host-pathogen system Patrícia Fernandes1,3,5, Carmen Santos1,3 Helena Machado1, Pedro Fevereiro3,4,*, Maria do Céu Silva5,6,*, Rita Lourenço Costa1,2,* PhD in Biology 1Instituto de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P.; 2Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa; 3Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; 4Departamento de Biologia Vegetal ,Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa; 5Centro de Investigação das Ferrugens do Cafeeiro, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa; 6 Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa; * Supervisors. INTRODUCTION The European chestnut (Castanea sativa) is a multipurpose species of great economic importance in Europe. However it is threatened by the pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi that causes severe root rot, also known as ink disease. The Asian species, Japanese (Castanea crenata) and Chinese chestnuts (Castanea mollissima), show resistance to this pathogen. Chestnut showing ink disease symptoms and lesions on the root after death [1] APPROACHES CHESTNUT BREEDING PROGRAM The program, initiated in 2006, has been based on the introgression of resistance genes from the Asian species into the European chestnut, through controlled crosses. Hybrid segregating progenies obtained were phenotyped, through the inoculation with the pathogen[1]. Four hybrids showing different levels of resistance to P. cinnamomi, together with the two contrasting phenotypes regarding disease resistance (C. sativa and C. crenata), were selected to understand the cellular and molecular modifications induced by the pathogen. This breeding program already produced a body of knowledge contributions through different papers [1][2][3][4]. LEVEL OF RESISTANCE [1][3] PHENOTYPING C. sativa Susceptible C. mollissima Resistant C. crenata X HYBRID POPULATIONS HOW CAN WE UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENT RESPONSES REVEALED BY SUSCEPTIBLE AND RESISTANT GENOTYPES? 1 HISTOPATHOLOGY Characterization of the host-pathogen system: Six months-old plants will be inoculated with P. cinnamomi. At different times after inoculation, root samples (inoculated and control) will be collected and prepared for light microscopic observations. The progression of pathogen infection and the sequence of responses it induces in root tissues of resistant and susceptible genotypes will be evaluated. P. cinnamomi zoospores (arrows) encystment and penetration The results will be used to choose the adequate time-points after inoculation to collect root samples for RNA-seq analysis 2 TRANSCRIPTOME ANALYSIS cDNA libraries will be synthetized from total RNA from the parents of the crosses (C. sativa and C. crenata), and also from four progenies with different phenotypes to P. cinnamomi infection. The root transcriptome profiles, of the resistant and susceptible genotypes, will be compared, before and after inoculation. Results will be compared with the previous ones obtained by the team[3][4]. The sequencing will be performed by using the Illumina platform Identification of candidate genes linked with the resistance of P. cinnamomi 3 VALIDATION OF THE CANDIDATE GENES Quantitative digital PCR; Microscopy techniques; Functional validation with optimized transformation protocols, available for chestnut species and Arabidopsis thaliana. REFERENCES: [1] Santos et al. (2015) Plant Pathology 64: 901–910. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12313. [2] Santos et al. (2015) Scientia Horticulturae 194: 181–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.043. [3] Santos et al. (2017) Frontiers in Plant Science. 8:515. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00515.[4] Serrazina et al. (2015) Tree Genetics & Genomes. 11: 6. doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0829-7. Acknowledgments: This work will be funded by Portuguese national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. (grant SFRH/BD/115424/2016)