Patentability Issues and Mechanism Claims

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Keys to Successful Commercialization Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. Tucson, Arizona October 18, 2001.
Advertisements

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE A full transcript of this presentation can be found under the Notes Tab. 35 USC 112 (f)*: Identifying Limitations.
Patenting Antisense Oligonucleotides and Methods
Proteomics Examination Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1646 (703)
Utility and Written Description Steve Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Esther Kepplinger Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations.
Orlando, Florida | Mayo v. Prometheus by:Jon M. Gibbs Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor and Reed PA.
1 Homology Language Brian R. Stanton Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (703)
1 Bioinformatics Practice Considerations October 20, 2011 Ling Zhong, Ph.D.
1 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph and the Wands Analysis Remy Yucel, SPE 1636 (571)
Double Patenting Simplified
Joseph K. McKane SPE, Art Unit U.S.C. 112, second paragraph Allows the public to determine exactly what the boundaries of the claimed inventions.
1 35 USC 112, 1 st paragraph enablement Enablement Practice in TC 1600 Deborah Reynolds, SPE
35 U.S.C. 112, Sixth Paragraph MPEP 2181 – 2186 Jean Witz Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
Gene Therapy: Overcoming Enablement Rejections Karen M. Hauda Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 1632 (703)
AIPLA Biotechnology Committee Webinar: Mayo v. Prometheus: Did the Bell Toll for Personalized Medicine Patents? Prof. Joshua D. Sarnoff DePaul U. College.
Proteomics and “Orphan” Receptors Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1646 (703)
“REACH-THROUGH CLAIMS”
1 Biotechnology Partnership Meeting April 17, 2001 James Martinell Senior Level Examiner Technology Center 1600.
1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) Gary Jones SPE, Technology Center 1600 (703)
Issues in Patenting Proteins Jon P Weber, SPE 1657.
Patent Applications Overlapping the Biotechnology and Mechanical Arts THOMAS BARRETT
Examination Issues: Immunology Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 USPTO (571)
1 Unity of Invention: Biotech Examples TC1600 Special Program Examiner Julie Burke (571)
RESTRICTING BETWEEN PRODUCT and PROCESS INVENTIONS Bruce Campell Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit
Understanding patent claims (f) Drug for the treatment of cancer.
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
Abrar M. Radwan Saleh Dr. Adham Abo-Taha An-Najah National University College of Pharmacy Pharmacy Program: Pharm D.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership: Recent Examiner Training and Developments Under 35 USC § 101 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner.
Broadening the Scope of the Claims in Gene Therapy Applications Deborah Reynolds Detailee, TCPS
Enablement in Claims to Therapeutic Treatment Jean Witz tQAS, TC1600.
Patenting Interfering RNA
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Technology Center 1600 Michael P. Woodward Unity of Invention: Biotech Examples.
Stereochemistry and Christopher Low
1 Written Description Analysis and Capon v. Eshhar Jeffrey Siew Supervisory Patent Examiner AU 1645 USPTO (571)
Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C U.S. Patent Claims By James A. Larson.
CHAPTER © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 20 Nonopioid Analgesics, Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatories, and Antigout Drugs.
Patentability of Reach-Through Claims Brian R. Stanton Practice Specialist Technology Center 1600 (703)
Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Michael P. Woodward Supervisory Patent Examiner.
Trilateral Project WM4 Report on comparative study on Examination Practice Relating to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Haplotypes. Linda S.
1 Demystifying the Examination of Stem Cell-Related Inventions Remy Yucel, Ph.D. Supervisory Patent Examiner Technology Center 1600 United States Patent.
Examining Claims for Compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112(a): Part II – Enablement Focus on Electrical/Mechanical and Computer/Software-related Claims August.
Vector Claims in Gene Therapy Applications: In vivo vs. In vitro Utilities Deborah Reynolds SPE GAU
“The Squeeze” Art and Enablement Together Yvonne L. Eyler, SPE AU 1646.
Patenting Interfering RNA John LeGuyader – SPE Art Unit 1635 (571)
Anthony Caputa Quality Lead OPQA
How to Claim your Biotech- Based Invention Deborah Reynolds Detailee, TCPS
Pharmaceutical Composition Claims and Enablement Robert J. Hill, Jr. Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center
1 Enablement Issues in Pharmaceutical Claims Joseph K. M c Kane Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit Ardin Marschel Supervisory Patent.
Examination Practice in Applications Presenting “Reach-Through Claims” George Elliott Practice Specialist Technology Center 1600
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 16, 2009 Class 2 Introduction to Patents.
Enablement requirement in view of recent IP court decisions Toshihiko Aikawa Japan Patent Attorneys Association International Activities Center AIPLA Mid-Winter.
1 Utility Guidelines, Homology Claims and Anti-Sense Molecule Claims Drew Hissong, Ph.D. dhissong*sughrue.com Sughrue Mion, PLLC
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP AIPLA BIOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE WEBINAR Leslie McDonell The contents of.
Difference to Generics What can they do for us in the future
Patenting Biotechnology in Japan and recent hot issues
Of Counsel Polsinelli, LLP
Legal Trends Regarding Ranges and Anticipation
Ram R. Shukla, Ph.D. SPE AU 1632 & 1634 Technology Center
MOPOP chapter 17- Kits Training
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil
Stem Cells Peter Paras, Jr.
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
A tutorial and update on patentable subject matter
Examination Practice in Applications Presenting “Reach-Through Claims”
Examination Issues: Immunology
KEY CONCEPT Genetics provides a basis for new medical treatments.
Presentation transcript:

Patentability Issues and Mechanism Claims Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Alexandria, Virgina April 29, 2004 Patentability Issues and Mechanism Claims Brian R. Stanton Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 Brian.stanton@uspto.gov 571-272-0552 11/14/2018

Big Picture Claim is drawn to a method of inhibiting biologic process X. Why would one desire to inhibit such a process? Is it purely of scientific interest, or Is it potentially correlated with some disease state(s)? Has it been demonstrated to correlate with some biologically significant process? 11/14/2018

Claim: A method of treating a disease characterized by abnormal Protein X expression comprising administering to a mammal in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of an inhibitor of protein X. 11/14/2018

Issues Prior art Scope of Disease Scope of therapeutic agent and its administration 11/14/2018

Prior Art Question How does the mechanism of action distinguish that which is claimed from the prior art? Can the claim be drafted to include a process step that would not have been anticipated or obvious in view of the prior art? 11/14/2018

Prior Art Example Claim: A method of treating a disease characterized by increased intracranial pressure by administering acetominophen. Prior art: Treatment of hydrocephaly with tylenolTM. Rejection: Claim is anticipated by prior art even though mechanism is not disclosed. Hydrocephaly was discovered by applicant to be associated with increased intracranial pressure. 11/14/2018

Potential Prior Art Solution Compare/contrast: 1. A method of lowering the risk of heart attack comprising administering aspirin. Anticipated by methods of treating, e.g., headaches 2. A method of lowering the risk of heart attack by administering 84mg of aspirin once daily for 10 years. Different dose/timing 11/14/2018

Questions: Disease What conditions/diseases are characterized by abnormal Protein X expression? Are they known in the art? What is disclosed in specification? What is the relationship of the disease(s) to protein X expression? Correlative? Causal? 11/14/2018

Disease Scope Claim: A method of treating arthritis by administering a therapeutically effective amount of a protein X antagonist to a patient in need thereof. Is disease terminology too generic? e.g. Increased protein X is shown to be causative of rheumatoid arthritis Claim is to treating arthritis generically. Since “arthritis” is a generic term encompassing a variety of inflammatory disorders with different etiologies (e.g. osteoarthritis), would one reasonably expect that a single compound would treat the entire genus? 11/14/2018

Questions: Agent What is the state of the art regarding protein X inhibitors? How does one use/administer different types of inhibitors? Small organics Antibodies Soluble receptor Antisense Peptide antagonist 11/14/2018

Written Description Questions 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, Written Description What diseases are associated with mechanism? What inhibitors are known? Assays are not a substitute for structural information 11/14/2018

Enablement Questions 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, enablement Would it require undue experimentation to determine what diseases are associated with mechanism? Would it require undue experimentation to determine how to administer an effective amount? Dosage, formulation, timing, mode… What guidance is there for how to make the inhibitors? Assay is not sufficient in and of itself without some guidance as to how to make. 11/14/2018

Potential Solution to 35 USC 112, issues Recite specific disorder(s) in claim Recite specific compound(s) in claim Recite specific dosage/adminstration regimens in claim(s) Consider filing a continuing application claiming a different invention drawn to Method of diagnosis Method of screening for effective agents 11/14/2018

Thank You Brian R. Stanton Quality Assurance Specialist Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Alexandria, Virgina April 29, 2004 Thank You Brian R. Stanton Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 Brian.stanton@uspto.gov 571-272-0552 11/14/2018