FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING AND MONITORING FOREST GOVERNANCE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADDRESSING FOREST GOVERNANCE THROUGH REDD+
Advertisements

Donor Performance Assessment Framework – results and lessons learnt on transparency and mutual accountability - Rwanda - John Bosco Ndaruhutse External.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
The UN-REDD Programme 1 st Policy Board Meeting 9-10 March 2009.
Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
Methodologies of monitoring and evaluating capacity development Makoto Kato Japan 1 UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating.
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
Enhancing the Effectiveness of School Feeding/Nutrition Programmes through Rights-based Approaches A Project Note SCN – Working Group on Nutrition, Ethics.
AN INTRODUCTION TO SPHERE AND THE EMERGENCY CONTEXT
GUIDANCE INSTRUMENTS FOR RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURE: AN OVERVIEW Pascal Liu Trade and Markets Division Food and Agriculture Organization of.
Directorate General “Environment” European Commission, Brussels
Policy Context Module 2: Analysis of Policy Context.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
UN REDD a collaborative programme of UN agencies on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to support developing countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP.
Eshboev B.A. Head of the Department for Monitoring of implementation of national development programmes of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.
International IDEA’s State of Democracy Assessment Methodology (SoD)
MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS INFRASTRUCTURE, PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND GOVERNANCE: WHAT CAN WE MEASURE? Rapporteur’s Report Thursday, 5 February,
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
VPA Impact Monitoring. an “evidence-based policy cycle” reiterative/adjustable to steer by based on reality checks to show if implementation leads to.
Massimiliano Riva Istanbul, 19 November 2008 Trade and Human Development How to conduct trade needs assessments in transition economies.
“Procurement Reforms and Capacity Building: Embedded in Public Financial Management” HLF on Public Procurement Reforms in Africa: Tunis Nov 2009.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
Date: in 12 pts EQAVET external evaluation and reporting Brussels June 2013.
Designing Effective REDD+ Safeguards Information Systems Jessica Boyle IISD With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
TRAFFIC/GFTN Legality Framework Ulrich Malessa, TRAFFIC Ian Gray, WWF GFTN.
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
Group 6 Impact Monitoring Session Panel: Paolo Cerutti (chair), Julia Falconer, Jo Van Brusselen Notes: Jo Van Brusselen, Clare Brogan Feedback to Plenary.
The EU Land policy Guidelines February 2003 Philip Mikos Overview of content and process.
Baseline Indicators and Performance Measurement Framework for Procurement Regional Workshop on Procurement Capacity Development Lima, Peru April.
Forest Governance for REDD Brenda Brito – Imazon CGF Meeting - Aceh, Indonesia May, 2010.
Lusaka, Zambia April The Dilemma of Measuring Corruption How do you measure something which differ across societies in terms of its definition,
INTEGRATED LAND-USE ASSESSMENT (ILUA) PHASE II AN OVERVIEW Bwalya Chendauka National Coordinator 2011 REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Presented by Bridget Nkor CRSFC. What is communication Exchange of information between people, o By means of speaking, o Writing, o Using a common system.
TI Manual for Assessing Integrity in the Development and Implementation of National REDD+ Strategies Claire Martin PAC REDD Project.
NEPAD's Role in Strengthening National Institutions for Data and Land Policy Analysis: Opportunities to Build on LGAF Estherine Lisinge Fotabong, Rudo.
Lessons learned from FGM workshop held on Jan 2012
Advocacy-driven monitoring Chatham House 2015 David Young
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
REDD+ Methodology: Issues Coming Out from Country Presentations
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Overview of Extractive Industries Governance Michael Levitsky (COCPO)
Suggestion for next steps for PGA for REDD+ in Vietnam
REDD+ National Strategies / Action Plans Development
UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008
Working Group Five Indicators and Measurement: demonstrating and improving impact After deliberating the definition of "success" for a transparency regime,
April 2011.
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
Sustainability Reporting
International Statistical Conference: INDEC's 50th Anniversary
Performance Tracking Table (PTT) Government of Sierra Leone
Overview of Bank Water Sector Activities
Urban Frei ecos Basel, Switzerland
OECD - MAPS Methodology for Assessment of Procurement Systems - Assessment Tool Arun Kumar Kolsur Senior Procurement Specialist January 13, 2019.
Jozsef Szlezak & Pawel Kazmierczyk (EEA)
Technology Planning.
High level seminar on the implementation of the
5.5. UN Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES)
Implementation of a Risk Management System by Cameroon Customs
Global SNA Implementation Strategy
Implementation of a Risk Management System by Cameroon Customs
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Peru Draft R-PP: Initial comments by the TAP
Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27th 2010
Xueman Wang, GPSC, World Bank
Lessons learned from REDD+ readiness processes
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
Presentation transcript:

FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING AND MONITORING FOREST GOVERNANCE Eva Müller FAO

Outline Background Purpose of the framework Intended users Structure/Content Plans for implementation Transparency and accountability

Background Internal and external pressures on countries to improve forest governance Existing initiatives use different approaches for different objectives Agreement by countries and experts on need for common approach International requirements Legality verification, REDD+, etc. Domestic governance reform pressures decentralization land tenure accountable and responsive government

Stockholm Symposium 2010 Simple framework needed Common terminology Core set of parameters Indicators to be defined by countries Expert group to develop Framework International requirements Legality verification, REDD+, etc. Domestic governance reform pressures decentralization land tenure accountable and responsive government

Objectives of Framework Facilitate description, diagnosis, monitoring, assessment and reporting on the state of governance in a country’s forest sector Enhance common understanding and communication about forest governance Avoid duplication of forest governance monitoring and assessment efforts

Intended Users Anyone involved in forest governance National governments: for forest governance self-diagnosis, monitoring and assessment Sub-national governments and NGOs: for specific forest governance processes, projects and initiatives Advocates, investors, donors, researchers and generators of forest governance data: for organizing, analyzing and communicating forest governance information

Features A tool, not a methodology Builds on approaches and lessons from forest governance-related processes and similar initiatives using indicators Includes core parameters already shared by many processes and initiatives Based on common understanding of principles and attributes of governance Provides menu of options 

Elements of the Framework Pillars (3) - fundamentals of forest governance Component (13) - an essential element of a pillar Subcomponent (78) - an identifiable element of a component, an important aspect of forest governance by which a component may be assessed Indicator – a quantitative, qualitative or descriptive attribute that if measured or monitored periodically, indicate the direction of change in a subcomponent

Using the Framework used in whole or in part depending on the purpose The Framework can be customized for/by different users: used in whole or in part depending on the purpose simplified by focusing only on certain pillars and components Expanded if aspects of interest to the user are not adequately covered

Implementation To be tested in different contexts: FLEGT: ACP-FLEGT Programme REDD+: PGAs WB Forest Investment Programme (FIP) National Forest Monitoring and Assessment Through multi-stakeholder processes and fora

Transparency and accountability Embedded in the components and subcomponents Assessment and monitoring based on the framework can lead to improvements .....if there is political will

Thank you www.fao.org/forestry www.profor.info