ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Advertisements

Surface Drive System (SDS)
14 th Annual Marine Money Greek Forum, October 2012 Sustainable investments in technology.
6.6 Interaction between a hull & a propeller
Dominic Hudson, Simon Lewis, Stephen Turnock
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS
Marine Auxiliary Machinery
MARINTEK Efficient prediction of extreme ship responses by MingKang Wu Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures, NTNU Norwegian Marine Technology Research.
Team Members: Félix O. Rivera Vélez Héctor M. Lebrón García Héctor J. Collazo Carro Orlando Valladares López.
Azipod vs. shaftline propulsion
Torque Analysis Results Front Motor Location Expanded Sizing Differences P11213.
Resistance and Powering of Ships
44 th Annual Conference & Technical Exhibition By Thomas Hartman, P.E. The Hartman Company Georgetown, Texas Sustainable Chilled Water.
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
Propulsion Chapter 9.
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast Turbulent Wind Flow over a High Speed Train R K Cooper School of Aeronautical Engineering.
Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2
Posiva Oy Olkiluoto Eurajoki Puh. (02) 8372 (31) faksi (02) DOPAS Demonstration of Plugs and Seals Posiva Plug Experiment POPLU at URCF.
Demand Response – A New Option for Wind Integration ?
Smart Rivers 2011 PIANC New Orleans, LA USA. Overview114-ft TowboatNumerical Towing TankPropellerRudder AOAClosure Brant R. Savander, Ph.D., P.E. Principal.
Numerical Prediction of Steady Flow Around High Speed Vessels with Transom Sterns S.X. Du 1,2, D.A. Hudson 2, W.G. Price 2, P. Temarel 2 and Y.S. Wu 1.
Whitelaw & Pearson The Costs of Increasing a Basic Shrimp Vessel from 65 to 85 FEET A Case Study.
Causes of added resistance in waves Unfavourable shifts in buoyancy forces causing heaving and pitching. This absorbs energy both from the waves themselves.
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
INTERACTION AND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PROPULSIVE PLANT AND ENGINE ROOM / DOUBLE BOTTOM STEELWORK.
A RANS Based Prediction Method of Ship Roll Damping Moment Kumar Bappaditya Salui Supervisors of study: Professor Dracos Vassalos and Dr. Vladimir Shigunov.
“ The Concept of the Low Carbon Town in the APEC” (1 st Part ) Low Carbon Model Town Workshop Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipei 18 October 2011 Satoshi Nakanishi.
Compound Aircraft Transport 1) Mx – 1018 project B-29/F-84 2) Tom-Tom Project B-36F/F-84 Model Problems of Compound Flight Configuration IConfiguration.
OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Oil Sea Harvester Project OSH design : Hydrodynamics.
1 TMR4225 Marine Operations, Part 2 Lecture content: –Linear submarine/AUV motion equations –AUV hydrodynamics –Hugin operational experience.
Multipurpose Polar Icebreaking Subsea Work Vessel Niko Kantonen Santeri Ihalainen.
Landscape of social innovation in Poland Brussels, May 2014.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND THE EU COHESION FUND: LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE Massimo Florio and Silvia Vignetti University of Milan and.
CFD Exercise 1 Laminar & turbulent flows with COMSOL.
Mesh Refinement: Aiding Research in Synthetic Jet Actuation By: Brian Cowley.
Advantages of Rotating Machines Less balancing problems Low lubricating oil consumption Higher reliability.
GEM341E Ship Hydrodynamics ________________________________________________ Ö. Gören1/ GEM341E SHIP HYDRODYNAMICS
Energetická náročnost budov
Center of Maritime Technology e. V. Matthias Krause
Controllable Pitch Propeller Blade Bolt Design
EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDIES ON TRIM EFFECTS George Tzabiras
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
ECO ships. Marketing teaser, albeit changing the shipping industry.
Energy Saving Bureau Industrial energy audits in coherence with Directive on the promotion of end-use efficiency and energy services.
Geometrical Similarity Kinematic Similarity Advance Coefficient.
HULL FORM DESIGN OPTIMIZATION AND DATA MINING
New BC Ferries.
HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS
WOCAT Videos on SLM WOCAT Secretariat, Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern.
ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms
Mechanical Losses in An Engine
Ship Hydrodynamics - Resistance
Head of Hydrodynamic department
NTOU Low Background Noise Large Cavitation Tunnel
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
Content Development of the second generation Power2 Case studies
Motivation Performance of power plants using ACC may largely be affected by wind conditions Up to 10% reduction in net plant power output for 10 m/s wind[1]
STAR Global Conference 2017
Azipod ® propulsor in oblique flow at full scale:
T. Guiard, Head of Energy-Saving Devices
ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms
Koen In de Braekt Wärtsilä, Propulsion System Services
Model Problems of Compound Flight
SPDA-1-3-OBS Software Upgrade
COBIT 5: Framework, BMIS, Implementation and future Information Security Guidance Presented by.
KICK-OFF Overview and thematic approach 19th of June 2017
Lessons learned from WFD reporting and follow-up
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
Lecture 4 Dr. Dhafer A .Hamzah
Presentation transcript:

ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms Adaptive Stern Geometry Thomas Stoye, Knut Frömming Flensburger Schiffbau-Gesellschaft June 4th, 2015 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo

Table of Contents Motivation & Objectives Evaluation Methods Evaluation Results Demonstrator Statement from class societies Conclusion Source: CALMAC

Motivation Design to specific design-point Operational profile consist of many points Adjustment of hull-form to actual operation point Stern part promising Adaptation physically feasible Source: FSG

Objectives Stern wedge change possible Large impact on resistance Identification of movable part Variation of length and angle within boundaries Change hydrodynamic body Movable duck-tail Source: FSG

Evaluation Methods CFD-study to determine parameters of variable part Viscous flow methods for resistance evaluation Selection of promising parameters Design of steel structure and piping-system Structural evaluation by class-rules and FE-Calculations Further evaluation of performance by model tests Resistance, open-water propeller and self-propulsion tests

Evaluation Results - CFD Variation of length and angle within boundaries Movable duck-tail with fixed angle selected Resistance reduction of up to 3% for some operational points Longer flap for larger speed Shorter flap for slower speed Flap Length [cm] Flap Angle [°] 80 7 14 20 30 40

Evaluation Results – Model Tests Source: ADAM4EVE-WP10 - VTT Verification of CFD-Results for resistance by model tests Additionally open-water propeller and self-propulsion tests Savings for large draft and high speed up to 7% of PD Fuel Savings for machinery arrangement and given operational profile ~3-3.5% per year Larger Benefit when implemented in new design Source: ADAM4EVE-WP06 - FSG

Model tests A new modular ship model, scale 1:16.697, was built for model tests Model propellers from FSG were used. The model scale resistance and propulsion tests were performed for the RoPax ship model with an adaptable stern geometry. 8

Draft in the resistance tests [m] Draft in the propulsion tests [m] Model test program Test program for the resistance and propulsion tests Speed points: The model test speeds: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.5, 19.5 and 20.5 knots in full scale, (1.637 – 2.581 m/s in model scale). In the CFD computations the selected speed points were 14 and 19.5 knots. Measured quantities: Open water tests of the propellers. Resistance test: towing force, sinkage fore and aft. Propulsion test: towing force, number of revolutions, thrust and torque of the propellers, sinkage fore and aft. The analysis to the full scale was made using ITTC-78 method. Hull version Flap length [m] Flap angle [°] Draft in the resistance tests [m] Draft in the propulsion tests [m] Initial aft (no flap) 0.0 4.8, 4.2 Short flap 0.4 20 4.8 Long flap 0.8 14 17 9

Resistance tests results T=4.8m Opimum flalp angle depending on speed max. Flap angle is never the best => optimum within measured range 10

Propulsion test results T=4.8m Propulsion optima are not always euqal to resistance optima: => Pressure field of propeller influences trim/draught of ship 11

Resistance tests results T=4.2m A significant influence of the draught on the working principle of the flap can be seen => Adaptable system useful 12

Propulsion test results T=4.2m 13

Evaluation Results – Structure Steel structure designed in 3D Class-Rules as basis for design Slamming loads determined by CFD FE-model used for direct calculations Critical areas identified – No show-stoppers Steel structure to be improved in next stage

Demonstrator Visualization of principle Steel structure with actuator Simplified 1:5 model Production ongoing Source: ADAM4EVE-WP06

Demonstrator Installation of pneumatic actuators Functional test Identification of robust pneumatic system

Class Societies Evaluation No major HAZIDS identified All risks are of controllable extend Details of fixation, dimensioning of piping-system to be looked Control-system and maintenance to be designed more detailed Evaluation for each individual application to be examined Source: ADAM4EVE-WP06 FSG

Conclusion Performance of idea very promising Implementation feasible and realistic Results certain due to model-tests Structural challenges can be solved No major HAZIDS identified To be developed and evaluated for each individual ship

Thank you for your attention! Source: VTT Thank you for your attention! The Project is funded in the Seventh Framework Program of the European Union - Contract No.: SCP2-GA-2012-314206

The Project is funded in the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union Contract No.: SCP2-GA-2012-314206