Natural History of ALL DM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Advertisements

Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
Source: Site Name and Year IHS Diabetes Audit Diabetes Health Status Report ______Site Name_________ Health Outcomes and Care Given to Patients with Diabetes.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE
Diabetes Mellitus Ibrahim Sales, Pharm.D. Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacy King Saud University
Blood glucose: is lower better for diabetic patients?
Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus by Santi Martini Departemen of Epidemiology Faculty of Public Health University of Airlangga.
Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE Glycemic Goals in the Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ADA and AACE Guidelines: Room For Improvement.
Lower the better; the case for glucose Professor Taner DAMCI Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical School, TURKEY.
Hyperglycemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes Bell DSH. Diabetes Care. 2003;26: Centers for Disease Control.
The Present and Future of Insulin Therapy in the Era of Pathophysiologic Treatment of T2DM: Marked Reduction of Insulin Use.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015 Stan Schwartz MD,FACP Affiliate, Main Line Health System Emeritus, Clinical Associate Professor.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Medical Professionals An Aggressive Pathophysiologic Approach to Cardiometabolic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Stanley Schwartz.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
The Obesity/Diabetes Epidemic: Perspectives, Consequences, Prevention, Treatment Stan Schwartz MD, FACP, FACE Private Practice, Ardmore Obesity Program.
Type 1 Diabetes Treatment Options Stanley Schwartz Mark Stolar Emeritus, Univ of Pa Part 1.
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
1 Part 1 Importance of Identifying and Managing Postprandial Hyperglycemia An Educational Service from G LYCO M ARK G LYCO M ARK is a registered trademark.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
IR and Hyperinsulinemia Insulin Resistance: A Survival Mechanism, Gone Awry Stan Schwartz MD,FACP Affiliate, Main Line Health System Emeritus, Clinical.
Diabetes Update Division of Endocrinology Department of Medicine Wayne State University Medical School Detroit, Michigan Part 1 of 3.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Medical Professionals An Aggressive Pathophysiologic Approach to Cardiometabolic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Stanley Schwartz,
The Obesity/Diabetes Epidemic: Adiposopathy & Obesity- The New Disease! Dx & (Rx) of Insulin Resistance & Early DM Part 5 Stan Schwartz MD, FACP, FACE.
Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Risk C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC Oct 16,2004 GWICC Beijing, PRC.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE Glycemic Goals in the Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ADA and AACE Guidelines: Room For Improvement.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015 Stan Schwartz MD,FACP Affiliate, Main Line Health System Emeritus, Clinical Associate Professor.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
An initiative of South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies (SAFES)
Practical Implementation as a Discussion with the Patient Practical Use of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in T2DM: Clinical Pearls- Perlas de Sabiduria Stan Schwartz.
Prevalence (%) estimates of diabetes (20-79 years) 2010.
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
DIABETES MELLITUS. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. DM is associated.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in T1DM: Some Can Delay Decline in C-peptide
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
The β-Cell Centric Classification of DM
β-Cell Centric Classification of Diabetes:
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
The ACCORD Trial: Review of Design and Results
Pathophysiology and Prevention of Heart Disease in Diabetes Mellitus
Beta-Cell Classification of Diabetes and the Egregious Eleven: Logic for Newer Algorithms/ Processes of Care The Role of Newer Anti-Diabetes Medications.
Natural History of ALL DM
Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates
Unified Theory of Diabetes and All Its Complications
Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Pathophysiology Conclude: do so without Hypoglycemia or Visceral Fat Weight Gain 1.
Metabolic Changes in Diabetes Mellitus
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Diabetes Health Status Report
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
Value of construct 1. Fits with Harry Keen’s construct
↑- likely due to hypoglycemia and weight gain
The β-Cell Centric Classification of DM
Vicious Circle(s) of Hyperinsulinemia- Result in Weight Gain and Hypoglycemia Undue Or bolus Hypoglycemia Symptomatic or not!
WHAT ABOUT COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES?
Diabetes and Exercise.
Glycemic control for macrovascular disease in type II diabetes: Evidence and insights from recent trials  Sanjay Rajagopalan  Journal of Indian College.
The Clock is ticking for the world’s leaders
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
New frontiers in Diabetes management
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
PowerPoint 16:9 Screen Ratio Template *
Hyperglycemic Targets & Hypoglycemia
Presentation transcript:

Natural History of ALL DM Age 0-15 15-40+ 15-50+ 25-70+ Macrovascular Complications Disability IR Phenotype MI CVA Amp IGT ALL DM DEATH Blindness Amputation CRF ETOH BP Smoking Eye Nerve Kidney Disability Microvascular Complications Risk of Dev. Complications 1

Most Mechanisms of B-Cell Damage (Hyperglycemia) Overlap with Causes of Vascular Disease : Provides Logic for treatment Regimes *Environment=Genetic susceptibility to eg: poor diet,lack of exercise, sleep disorders,, food AGEs, Gut Biome **Insulin Resistance= Centrally Induced, Peripheral, Stress Hormones, Gut Biome MacroVascular Damage Inflammation Immune Reg. Polygenic monogenic epigenetic Environment Brownlee’s Unified Theory of Complications Insulin Resistance-Part of Cardiometabolic Syn. with BP, Lipid MicroVascular Damage *Environment=Genetic suceptibility to eg: viruses, endocrine disruptors, food AGEs, Gut Biome; **Insulin Resistance= Centrally Induced, Peripheral, Stress Hormones, Gut Biome

Diabetic complications Hyperglycemia Leads to Complications: May Be Present Prior to Diagnosis Hyperglycemia Spike (+variability) Argument for Early Discovery Pre-diabetes, Early Treatment, Determine on Hospital Admission Continuous PPG A1C Chronic toxicity Acute toxicity Tissue lesion Diabetic complications Hyperglycemia Leads to Diabetic Complications T2DM is marked by the development and progression of long-term complications. Hyperglycemia leads to acute toxicity due to postprandial glucose spikes, and chronic toxicity due to continuous elevations in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (A1C) level, which both lead to microvascular (ie, retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) and macrovascular (ie, peripheral vascular disease [PVD], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke) complications.1-3 References: American Diabetes Association. Complications of diabetes in the United States. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/complications.jsp. Accessed March 22, 2006. Brownlee M. Advanced products of nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. In: Rifkin H, Porte D, eds. 4th ed. Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc; 1990:279-291. Ceriello A. Postprandial hyperglycemia and diabetes complications: is it time to treat? Diabetes. 2005;54:1-7. Category: Hyperglycemia, Diabetes Keywords: hyperglycemia, diabetes, complications Microvascular Macrovascular Retinopathy Nephropathy Neuropathy PVD MI Stroke American Diabetes Association. At: http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/complications.jsp. Brownlee M. Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc; 1990:279-291. Ceriello A. Diabetes. 2005;54:1-7. 3 3 3

Cardiovascular disease and diabetes No A1C threshold is apparent Finnish study by Kuusisto et al; UKPDS epidemiologic analysis; EPIC-Norfolk Study ~65% of deaths are due to CV disease Cardiovascular complications of T2DM Coronary heart disease deaths 2- to 4-fold Stroke risk 2- to 4-fold Cardiovascular disease and diabetes Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary complication of diabetes; approximately 65% of deaths in people with diabetes are due to heart disease and stroke. Adults with diabetes have higher rates of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure (HF) than nondiabetic adults: CHD death rates are 2 to 4 times higher Risk of stroke is 2 to 4 times higher HF occurs twice as frequently in men and 5 times more frequently in women aged 45 to 74 years In 2004, the estimated prevalence of physician-diagnosed diabetes among adults was 15.2 million; the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 5 million. According to the most recent government statistics, approximately one-third of the US population with diabetes is undiagnosed.(1) Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and postprandial hyperglycemia are CV risk factors Funagata Diabetes Study; Honolulu Heart Program; DECODE Study; Rancho Bernardo Study Heart failure 2- to 5-fold Bell DSH. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2433-41. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). www.cdc.gov. T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus 1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics. 2007 Update.

Diabetes is associated with significant loss of life years Men Women 7 7 Non-vascular deaths Vascular deaths 6 6 Starts with inc. PPG Years of life lost 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 40 50 60 70 Age (years) 80 90 0 40 50 60 70 Age (years) 80 90 On average, a 50-year-old individual with diabetes and no history of vascular disease will die 6 years earlier compared to someone without diabetes . Seshasai et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:829-41

Meta-analysis of intensive glucose control in T2DM: major CV events including heart failure Number of events More intensive Less intensive Difference in HR (95% CI) HbA1c (%) -0.88 0.96 (0.83, 1.10) Stroke 378 370 Myocardial infarction 730 745 -0.88 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) Hospitalisation for or death from heart failure 459 446 -0.88 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) 0,50 1,00 2,00 Favours more intensive Favours less intensive • Meta-analysis of 27,049 participants and 2370 major vascular events from: – ADVANCE UKPDS ACCORD VADT HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular Turnbull FM et al. Diabetologia 2009;52:2288–2298

Impact of Intensive Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Summary of Major Clinical Trials: BUT Subset Evaluations Show Reduced CV Outcomes if shorter duration of DM, without significant pre-existing complications Initial Trial Long Term Follow-up Study Microvascular Macrovascular Mortality UGDP ↔ UKPDS ↓ DCCT/EDIC* ACCORD ↑(unadj.), ↔ (adj.) ADVANCE VADT ↑- likely due to hypoglycemia and weight gain 7

Remember- no measure of glucose at demise; No assessment of hypoglycemia unawareness

Frequency of Hypoglycemic Symptoms Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Lundkvist et al1 compared the frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms among 309 patients with type 2 diabetes who were receiving oral agents only or insulin. Symptoms of hypoglycemia were reported by 115 patients during the previous month, representing a 37% incidence of hypoglycemia (24% of patients experienced symptoms once during the month, 11% every week, and 2% every day).1 The results demonstrated that the frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms in 1 month was lower for patients with type 2 diabetes using only oral agents than in patients taking insulin, as seen on this chart.1 Other studies in Asia and Europe have shown similar prevalence of self-reported hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents.2,3

Asymptomatic Episodes of Hypoglycemia May Go Unreported In clinical studies of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), episodes of hypoglycemia have been found to go unrecognized.1–3 Chico et al1 used CGM to measure the frequency of unrecognized episodes of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 (n=40) and type 2 (n=30) diabetes. CGM detected unrecognized hypoglycemic events in 55.7% of all patients. In the subset of patients with type 2 diabetes, CGM detected hypoglycemic events in 46.6% of patients.1 Other researchers have reported similar findings.2,3

Consequences of Hypoglycemia Prolonged QT- intervals- (Diabetologia 52:42,2009) Can be of pronged duration (IJCP Sup 129, 7/02) Greater with higher catecholamine levels (Europace 10:860) Associated with Angina (Diabetes Care 26, 1485, 2003) Ischemic EKG changes (Porcellati, ADA2010) Associated with Arrhythmias Associated with Sudden Death (Endocrine Practice 16,¾ 2010) Increased Variability- increases inflammation, ICU mortality (Hirsch ADA2010)

But Guidelines Gluco-Centric Shouldn’t we take into account avoiding hypo Shouldn’t we take into account avoiding weight gain Shouldn’t we take into account CV risk