Intra-pixel Sensitivity Testing Preliminary Design Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OL 750 Diffuse Spectral Reflectance Measurement System
Advertisements

NGAO Calibration/Simulation Source T. Stalcup, M. Pollard.
A Narrow Field Lobster Eye Telescope Dick Willingale – AXRO December 2014 A Narrow Field Lobster Eye Telescope (for SVOM and similar) Dick Willingale Adrian.
SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total.
A Guide to Spectroradiometry
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 Baffle and Straylight1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers A Brief Guide to Understanding and Obtaining the Proper Resolution of the 785 Raman System.
1 Estimate on SOT light level in flight with throughput measurements in SOT sun tests T. Shimizu 1, T. Tarbell 2, Y. Suematsu 3, M. Kubo 1, K. Ichimoto.
Aperture Pupil (stop) Exit Pupil Entrance Pupil.
OL 750 Measurement Systems
PALM-3000 P3K Stimulus Design Update Rick Burruss P3K Team Meeting #7 February 27, 2008.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
Absolute Photon Calibration of Zeiss Observer Z1 Microscope Shawn Miller Department of Optical Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Optics.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer (EUS) for SOLO L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department.
Dennis C. Evans p1 SuperNova/Acceleration Probe 16 November 2001 Optical Analysis & Stray Light Evaluation Optical Analysis and Stray Light Evaluation.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
Engineering: NAHUAL Ireland Acquisition Camera, Focal Plane Mechanisms and Layout Tully Peacocke, National University of Ireland Maynooth Carlos del Burgo,
ZTFC 12-segment field flattener (and related) options R. Dekany 07 Aug 2012.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 FPFPU Alignment1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
Herschel Space ObservatoryPACS Science Verification ReviewMPE 22/23 June 2006 GJ / MPE 1 PACS Test Facility Capabilities – Cryogenics and OGSE Gerd Jakob.
Optronic Laboratories Inc. OL Series 750 Automated Spectroradiometric Measurement System Optronic Laboratories Inc. OL Series 750 Automated Spectroradiometric.
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
Optical Subsystem Roy Esplin Dave McLain. Internal Optics Bench Subassembly 2 Gut Ray Dichroic Beamsplitter (MWIR reflected, LWIR transmitted) LWIR Lens.
ZTF Optics Design P. Jelinsky ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
1 SNAP Calibration Hardware Contributors: Chuck Bower Nick Mostek Stuart Mufson Mike Sholl.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
OL 750 Measurement Systems OL 750 Measurement Systems Optronic Laboratories, Inc.
Low Polarization Optical System Design Anna-Britt Mahler Polarization Laboratory Group College of Optical Sciences.
Optical principles of diffraction focussing, Preparing the way to space borne Fresnel imagers NiceSeptember 23-25, Fresnel Imagers Observatoire.
FourStar Status Eric Persson (OCIW) Presented By.
ZTF Optics Design ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Telescope Desiderata. Various Goals Imagery / surveys - discovery, census – Consider scales, POSS vs HST, etc Astrometry / motions / distances Photometry.
STC "VOSKHOD", PROJECT "SPECTR-UV", JUNE 2006 Next slide Next slide Previous slide Possible layouts of Field Cameras.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof.
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
Internal CDR meeting December 20th, 2005
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
30-Nov-2006 Jean-Marc Defise - CSL
Point Source Transmission Simulations on the COROT baffle
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
SNAP spectrograph demonstrator : Test Plan
An IFU slicer spectrometer for SNAP
Persistence Experiment Preliminary Design Review
What Is Spectral Imaging? An Introduction
XRT Performance Update
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
FRED Coherence FRED: A software tool for modern engineering.
David Burke Maynooth University Department of Experimental Physics
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
OL 750 Measurement Systems
Observational Astronomy
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
OL 750 Spectroradiometer & Linear Spectral Transmission Measurements
Spot-Projector System for the Measurement of Intra-Pixel Response
Presentation transcript:

Intra-pixel Sensitivity Testing Preliminary Design Review 3 August 2001 Stella Jang SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE

Goals Present the calibrated target/ 3-axis stage design Present requirements for blackbody radiation contrast and pixel saturation Show that the proposed design meets the necessary requirements Show that required tolerances can be met Approve a plan for moving from PDR to CDR 14 November 2018 2

Definition of Intra-pixel Sensitivity Ni,j =number of electrons/second detected in pixel i,j ei,j(x,y) =intra-pixel sensitivity at x,y in pixel i,j I =number of photons/second arriving at x,y in pixel i,j j+2 j+1 j i i+1 i+2 i+3 14 November 2018 3

Definition of Intra-pixel Sensitivity Figure 8. DRM-quality photometry (1%) cannot be achieved according to our measurements of intra-pixel sensitivity. (Left) Intra-pixel sensitivity of HgCdTe to a point source measured by Co-I Finger. (Right) NICMOS magnitude errors as a function of intra-pixel source location (Stiavelli, private communication). 14 November 2018 4

IPS Experiment Requirements (from TFST0900, Table 1) Wavelength range 0.5 – 5.5 mm Sampling 5x5 – 10x10 per pixel with 1%relative position error Image size < 5 mm FWHM over 10 x 10 pixel central region, no requirement outside this area 14 November 2018 5

NGST Requirements NDC0200 (from NGST Doc. #641) 14 November 2018 6

Modules pinhole Offner light source light guide focal reducer 3-axis stage filters window 14 November 2018 7

Layout with f/1.5 focal reducer 45° flat 45° flat Offner secondary f/10 point source detector focal reducer filter window Offner primary 14 November 2018 8

Shaded model -- with focal reducer 14 November 2018 9

Close-up of f/1.5 focal reducer 14 November 2018 10

Modules Requirements 14 November 2018 11

14 November 2018 12

14 November 2018 13

PSF 14 November 2018 14

10 x 10 pixel field (l = 5 mm) 14 November 2018 15

Flux Equation T =temperature of source QE =absolute quantum efficiency of detector Toptics =transmission of window, mirrors, and central obscuration of the focal reducer Tvar =variable transmission at light guide exit port TPK50 =transmission of PK50 blocking filter Tfilter =transmission of bandpass filter W =solid angle subtended by entrance pupil at source A =area of emitting surface ti =integration time 14 November 2018 16

T=300K 14 November 2018 17

T=3250K 14 November 2018 18

14 November 2018 19

PK50 light guide 14 November 2018 20

Johnson-R 14 November 2018 21

Johnson-R 14 November 2018 22

Johnson-I 14 November 2018 23

Johnson-I 14 November 2018 24

J 14 November 2018 25

J 14 November 2018 26

H 14 November 2018 27

H 14 November 2018 28

K 14 November 2018 29

K 14 November 2018 30

L’ 14 November 2018 31

L’ 14 November 2018 32

M’ 14 November 2018 33

M’ 14 November 2018 34

Software Requirements Integrated control software exposure (multi-plane FITS) filter wheels 3D stage light source (on/off and intensity)? Analysis software data reduction pipeline IDL 14 November 2018 35

Designs Light source - Coherent quartz tungsten halogen -150W/3250K - Variable intensity Light guide - Coherent 24” multi-fiber gooseneck - 5.54mm exit port diameter Pinhole - 5 mm diameter in a 1” retaining ring mount 3-axis stage - 3 Newport compact motorized translation stages - Newport motion controller Window - 110mm - 10mm thickness - Mounted in end plate of dewar. Filters - Johnson-R, Johnson-I, J, H, K, L’, M’, PK50 14 November 2018 36

Designs (cont’d) Offner relay - Re-images source 1:1 onto detector Allows decent imaging at f/10 over full 2K2 field Provides excellent imaging over a smaller central region Compact, folded design fits available space All reflective optical design is free from chromatic aberration Focal reducer - Produces f/1.5 beam for sub-pixel imaging At f/10, diffraction-limited FWHM = 22.6 mm (l = 2.2 mm) At f/1.5, diffraction-limited FWHM is = 3.4 mm (l = 2.2 mm) Single-element optic with 4 different surface radii (2 elliptical, 2 spherical) Reflective coatings on the two elliptical surfaces Parfocal with f/10 beam, designed to reside in a filter wheel Provides subpixel imaging over a 10 pixel diameter region 14 November 2018 37

Designs 14 November 2018 38

Hardware Set-up 3-axis motion stages are assembled and attached to the motion driver Pinhole and light source needs to be attached to 3-axis stage Flux from light guide exit port must be variable 14 November 2018 39

Notes on Schedule Some hardware not ordered yet Anticipate that the hardware will be complete no earlier than December 14 November 2018 40

Open Issues Controlling efficiency at the light guide exit port This has implications for the pinhole/stage design M’ filter bandwidth How to suppress flux for wavelength < 4 mm ? Monochromator vs. Filters Cost Time 14 November 2018 41