Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. Patterns and Predictors of Stress Testing Modality After.

Advertisements

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Screening.

Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Digital Mammography and Screening for Coronary Artery.

Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 10-Year Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction Using.

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Asymptomatic Individuals With a Positive Family.

Copyright © 2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Fig. 3. Bland-Altman plots of CAC scores between TNC image and MDW (A), MDC (B), MSI (C) images. Mean CAC score from TNC image and VNC images is plotted.

Figure 1 The flowchart depicts the total number of procedures in the Western Denmark Heart Registry (WDHR) and the exclusion of patients; NPR, National.

Adel H. Allam et al. JIMG 2011;4:

Erling Falk et al. JIMG 2009;2:

Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax. Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax.

Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Example of Subendocardial Defects With Normal Transmural WT on Apical 3-Chamber View With RTMCE Apical 3-chamber view of RTMCE with power modulation (iE33,

Wesley T. O’Neal et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Figure 2 Association between coronary artery disease polygenic risk score and the presence of migraine Results are given as odds ratios with 95% confidence.

Miralem Pasic et al. JCIN 2015;8:1-9

Ashraf Hamdan et al. JCIN 2015;8:

Khurram Nasir et al. JACC 2015;66:

Figure 1 ROC curve of ASFMR1-TV2

Baseline Characteristics

Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Matthew Oster et al. JACC 2019;73:

S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Prabhat Kumar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep

Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Vanessa M. Ferreira et al. JIMG 2013;6:

Hampton A. Crimm et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Clinical course of participants with high cardiovascular risk profile

K.R. Julian Chun et al. JACEP 2017;3:

S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Noboru Ichihara et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Yusuke Watanabe et al. JCIN 2016;9:

Francesco Prati et al. JIMG 2013;6:

John Rickard et al. JCHF 2013;1:

Comparative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in association with 30-day mortality for severity scores.

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for the metabolites between the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (n=15) and sepsis (n=35) groups.

Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:

Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:

Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:

Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:

(A) ROC for the prediction of 5-year mortality in unoperated significant MR. AUCs and corresponding p values are shown for lateral annulus E/E′ (AUC=0.69,

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI)) for FACED (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, age, chronic colonisation.

Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:

Glenn N. Levine et al. JACC 2011;58:e44-e122

Alan Rozanski et al. JIMG 2017;10:

Davide Capodanno et al. JCIN 2009;2:

Thomas Knickelbine et al. JIMG 2009;2:

Jeffrey J. Teuteberg et al. JCHF 2015;3:

Leslee J. Shaw et al. JIMG 2010;3:

Receiver-operating characteristic curves showing the performance of the diabetes risk score in predicting diabetes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) citizens.

Christian Madelaire et al. JCHF 2018;6:

Khadijah Breathett et al. JCHF 2017;5:

Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41

Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41

Hisa Shimojima et al. JACEP 2018;4:

Bjarne L. Nørgaard et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) of model B: the total score of ‘the presence of six optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Michael Reed et al. JCIN 2009;2:

Plaque Modification in Severe Coronary Artery Calcification by Lithoplasty (A) Angiography demonstrates a stenotic lesion in the mid right coronary artery,

Itzhak Kronzon et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Heat map of microRNA microarray expression from the four groups of patients. Heat map of microRNA microarray expression from the four groups of patients.

James A. Goldstein et al. JIMG 2008;1:

Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41

Miralem Pasic et al. JCIN 2015;8:1-9

Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41

Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41

ROC analysis of MIC-1 and CA19-9.

Presentation transcript:

Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:990-999 ROC Curves of 3 Models Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves show the incremental value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA): risk factors only (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.74, p < 0.001 [blue line]). Risk factors plus CACS (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.85, p < 0.001 [yellow line]), and risk factors plus CACS plus coronary CTA (AUC 0.93; 95% CI: 0.92 to 0.95, p < 0.001 [red line]). Green line indicates reference line. Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:990-999 American College of Cardiology Foundation