Radiological Assessment March 29, 2011. AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Health and Healthcare Issues. Public Health and Healthcare.
Advertisements

Module IV - Dose terms and units
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources Health Physics Society - Power Reactor Section Radiation Science Education.
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources
Med Phys 3A03/3AB2 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.
7. PV System Sizing Herb Wade Consultant
Background Radiation.
Radiation Dosimetry and Safety Thomas H. Hauser MD, MMSc, MPH, FACC Director of Nuclear Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Assistant Professor.
Radiological Assessment March 25, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 70 hours of flying – Flight operations.
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
DOE Response to Radiological Releases from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Daniel Blumenthal, PhD, CHP Manager, Consequence Management Program.
How Much Radiation Is That Giving Me, Doc? Suggestions for explaining risk from ionizing radiation: 1.There is, always has been, and always will be naturally-
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Overview of Basic Concepts in Emergency Preparedness and Response Day 10 – Lecture 2.
1 NRC Meteorologists Role in Support of the Headquarters Operations Center During an International Event Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Cleaning up residential areas after a nuclear accident – Accident scenario Michael Ammann, STUK.
1 Radiological Effects Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Jim Lynch NRC Region III August 24, 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Biological response and radiation safety practices
Radiological Monitoring of Air and Drinking Water in British Columbia Following the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Environmental Health Services (EHS) British.
A Radiation Primer radiation … radioactive material What are they? exposure … contamination Are they the same?
Radon Awareness Dr Julian MacDonald Radiation Protection Adviser Medical Physics Department.
[
Headlines Natural disasters & Japan earthquake by Rand Al-Subu Haiti earthquake by Hanin Sawalha Wars by Bisan Abu Salah Gaza war by Marwa isma’el.
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Working with Radioisotopes: Reducing the Risk
Nuclear Energy Radiation. What is a Radioactive Element? Radioactive elements have a nucleus that is unstable. It decays or breaks apart releasing energy.
“The World We Create” NATS 101 Section 6 Don’t forget to turn in your homework! 02/02.
Introduction to Radiation: Definition of Terms
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
1 Module 2 Health and Medical Effects. 2 Health and Medical Effects Terminal Objective: DESCRIBE the indicators, signs, and symptoms of exposure to radiation.
Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Thomas S. Tenforde President Presentation.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
NUCLEAR VS. CHEMICAL CHEMICAL reactions involve rearranging of atoms: e.g., H 2 +O 2  H 2 O No new atoms are created. Chemistry involves electrons only.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
Health Physics 1a: Sources of Radiation. Introduction Scientists have studied radiation for over 100 years and we know a great deal about it. Radiation.
C O A L I T I O N Corner Radon: Health Hazard and Disclosure Issue Coalition Corner: Business training tools for HR staff, real estate licensees and other.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Nuclear Power Plants... Operate in most States and produce about 20 percent of the Nation’s power. Nearly 3 million Americans live within 10 miles of an.
1 WEEK 7 RADIATION BIOLOGY & PROTECTION Part 1 FINAL.
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
1 Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation 9.1 Natural Radioactivity Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Daily variation of radiation dose rate after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident poster (EGU ), Friday ( ) 1 M. Yamauchi Swedish.
Radiological Assessment April 4, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Nuclear and radiological incidents – Introduction
Nuclear Radiation Today Chapter 10.3 Notes. Where is radiation? Radiation is everywhere—the form of nuclear radiation that occurs naturally is called.
Integrated Science C Mrs. Brostrom. Describe the availability, current uses and environmental issues related to the use of fossil and nuclear fuels to.
Wed/Thurs Dec 3-4 Objective: Calculate the radiation exposure of different people. Checkpoint: How much radiation (in mSv) is a cancer risk? How much radiation.
August 2005 EMS & Trauma Systems Section Office of Public Health Preparedness RADIOLOGICAL NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE.
1 Health Safety & Radiation Protection (RAD453) Course : بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Chapter 3: Sources of Radiation Omrane KADRI, Ph.D.
Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies CERT Basic Training Hazards.
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
The “Green Run”.
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Members of the Public and Other Organizational Personnel Working in Proximity to RASP Controlled Areas.
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Radiological Assessment March 29, 2011

AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were curtailed on March and March 25 due to weather – Flight operations conducted March 27 and 28 focused on areas outside of a 25 mile radius from the incident site – NNSAs Consequence Management Response Teams have collected thousands of ground measurements provided by DOE, DoD and the Japanese monitoring teams

Guide to Interpretation US radiological assessments are composed of aerial and ground measurements and indicate the amounts of radiological material that has settled on the ground. Each measurement corresponds to the radiation a person receives in one hour at that location. AMS data is presented as exposure rate 1 meter from the ground at the time the measurements occurred. All measurements in this plot are below 0.03 Rem per hour – a low but not insignificant level.

Assessment Assessment: The dose rates measured by AMS have decreased since last week. This is expected due to radioactive decay of the material deposited on the ground AMS monitoring results in areas beyond 25 miles from the Fukushima Daiichi reactors show areas where dose rates are many times higher than historical background. – The measured external dose rates in these areas are not high enough to warrant evacuation or relocation of the population, however, lower levels of radioactive contamination in food provide more of a risk because the radioactive material can be ingested into the body. Agricultural monitoring in these areas may be warranted. Radiological material has not deposited in significant quantities in the areas measured since March 19.

Context The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that the average American absorbs 620 mRem a year* (or mRem/hour) An average transatlantic flight produces an exposure of 2.5 mRem* A typical chest x-ray produces 10 mRem per image EPA guidelines call for public health actions if exposure exceed 1000 mRem over 4 days * Source: NRC: