The Use of LiDAR Data to Analyze Snowpack with ArcGIS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gina Loss – Service Hydrologist Dave Bernhardt – Science & Operations Officer Great Falls, Montana.
Advertisements

Mapping future snow cover in Idaho Brandon C. Moore University of Idaho.
Accessing LIDAR GIS day 2012 Larry Theller ABE Purdue University.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Habitat Analysis in ArcGIS Use of Spatial Analysis to characterize used resources Thomas Bonnot
Viewshed Creation: From Digital Terrain Model to Digital Surface Model Edward Ashton.
Embedded sensor network design for spatial snowcover Robert Rice 1, Noah Molotch 2, Roger C. Bales 1 1 Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of.
SnowSchool Prediction Contest! Bogus Basin Webcam.
Jenna Forsyth 12/07/09 Chester Morse Lake, Cedar River Watershed, WA Photo Courtesy of
Lt. Col. Paweł BORYN, PhD POLISH EXPERIENCES IN PREPARING HIGH- RESOLUTION MAPS FOR JTLS.
Hydrology of the Snake River in Hells Canyon Wil Sarchet GIS in Water Resources.
.LAS files (Log ASCII Standard) Not useable directly in ArcGIS A single X-Y position can have multiple Z values Must be converted to MultiPoint file.
Sensor Placement Application and Snowpack Distribution Model from LiDAR Data Zeshi Zheng Graduate Students Systems Engineering UC Berkeley.
Managing Water Quality Data A GIS Project for CE394K by Dharhas Pothina.
LIDAR – Light Detection And Ranging San Diego State University.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
PATRICK SEJKORA NOVEMBER 17, 2009 GIS IN WATER RESOURCES Yellowstone Fires and Their Hydrologic Effects.
Unit Conversions. A physical quantity must include: Number + Unit.
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
SnowSchool Prediction Contest! Bogus Basin Webcam.
ANALYSIS OF AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA FOR ROAD INVENTORY CLAY WOODS 4/25/2016 NIRDOSH GAIRE CEE 6190 YI HE ZHAOCAI LIU.
Surface Analysis Tools. Lesson 7 overview  Topographic data  Sources  Uses  Topographic analysis  Hillshade  Visibility  Contours  Slope, aspect,
Using ArcGIS to Design Wetland Restorations By Scott Ralston, USFWS Windom, MN Available for Download from: SKRalston.com/USFWS/
Ontario’s Current LiDAR Acquisition Initiative
Snow and Snowmelt Runoff
Under supervision of: David Tarboton
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
watershed analysis of Oak Ridge
Christian Michaelson Joe Anderson
Lidar and GIS: Applications and Examples
David A. Robinson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
ERT247 GEOMATICS ENGINEERING
LIDAR and TDS in GIS A Comparison of Channel Geometry Profiles Created from Remotely Sensed and On-the-Ground Survey Data (or..how a programmer in China.
Lidar at the TRCA Applications and Uses for a Conservation Authority
Water-Surface Evaporation in Reservoir
Watershed characterization to analyze geomorphic channel change
Snowmelt Modeling using UEB and GIS
Using LiDAR Data within Smallworld
GIS at the Delaware Geological Survey
Establish GIS for the TW Daniel Experimental Forest (TWDEF) Field Area and Export TWDEF Information to the Google Earth CEE 6440, GIS in Water Resources.
Shannon Clemens GIS for Water Resources December 2, 2008
Rajiv Prasad (Utah State University) David G
Relationships between lake water levels and Habitat at Bear Lake,UT
Section 11: Select Application
Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho
Vinod Mahat, David G. Tarboton
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Applying GIS to Santa Cruz Island:
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2017
What Causes Flooding along the Logan river
CEE 6640:GIS for Water Resources 11/23/2010 Naho Orita
Increasing Storage Capacity For Woodruff Creek Reservoir
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2009
A GIS model for locating climatically sensitive trees in northern Utah
Hyrum Reservoir and how it applies to Flood Control by Nathan Wright
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2013
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2012
Utilizing Automated Tools in ArcGIS
Using ArcGIS Pro to Evaluate the Impacts of In-Stream Barriers on Fish Habitats Case study: Bonneville cutthroat trout (BCT) habitats in the Bear River.
Lecture 01: Introduction
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: Plans for Quality Assessment of Raster Datasets
Flooding Potential in Bloomington, Idaho
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
3 Week A: May 1 – 19 3 Week B: May 22 – June 9
Image Classification of the Upper South Fork Eel River Watershed
4. Focal Analysis 4.1 Definition of focal analysis
Presentation of Jordan Case Study First Management Board Meeting
2017 Snowpack Status and Streamflow Outlook for Walker Basin
Presentation transcript:

The Use of LiDAR Data to Analyze Snowpack with ArcGIS By: Sam Tyler

Outline Daniel Forest Objectives LiDAR flight data Classification 2008; March 28th, April 28th 2009; March 18th, March 27th, May 27th, July 08th Classification Process/ Method Model Builder to automate Results Conclusion

Daniel Forest (TWDEF) Location: 30 miles Northeast of Logan, Utah TWDEF area of .78km^2 Elevation: 8600ft Watershed contributes to the Logan River and Bear Lake Vegetation

Objectives Will TWDEF LiDAR data determine snow depth? Compare LiDAR data to field measurements of Vinod Mahat Compare LiDAR depth to SNOWTEL data.

LiDAR Data Classification

Snow Survey & SNOTEL Site Locations 21 snow survey points Visited every two weeks: 2007-2009 Imagery Map

XYZ Data ArcGIS March 27, 2009 July 8, 2009 XYZ Ground Classification

Tin Tin 3D Analyst Tool Point Cloud Density

Conversion to Raster Tin to Raster 3D Analyst Ease Calculations

Raster Difference Minus Tool March 27, 2009 minus July 8, 2009

Model Builder

Value Output to Snow Survey Points

GIS Data to Excel for Comparison Vinod ground measurements Comparison of Tin LiDAR to Raster LiDAR Conversion from meters to inches

SNOTEL Data Analysis SNOTEL data: 24 hours 96” LiDAR 95”

Conclusion TWDEF LiDAR accuracy. Accuracy requirements while using LiDAR data. 0-9 inches Considerations while using TWDEF LiDAR : Classification Reflection Time difference LiDAR depth vs. SNOWTEL

Acknowledgements Vinod Mahat Dr. David Tarboton Tseganeh Zekiewos Brad Carter Questions?