PROJECT GROUP 1A IN4MATX 132 Group 1A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
Advertisements

<<replace with Customer Logo>>
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
Colin Clark, Fluid Project Technical Lead, University of Toronto Daphne Ogle, Fluid Project Design Lead, University of California, Berkeley.
Research Plan Group 1. Research Issues: Increased usability on the new site? H1. Is faster to complete the proces on the new site. H2. The information.
Department of Computer Science
Wolverine Access: Faculty Center School of Information | University of Michigan Tiffany Chao, Saurabh Koparkar, Jane Loegel & Megan Morrissey 18 April.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
U.C. Berkeley Calendar Network Usability Evaluation Nadine Fiebrich & Myra Liu IS214 May 4, 2004.
Identifying and Compensating for Biases in User Feedback A Case Study Team Chartreuse.
Kickoff Meeting Jam 11/18/2011 © Copyright All rights reserved.
1 Supporting Sakai: Lessons from the University of Michigan Sean DeMonner Jeff Ziegler Usability Support and Evaluation Lab.
Fusion GPS Externalization Pilot Training 1/5/2011 Lydia M. Naylor Research Lead.
INFO 330 Class Project Do it for real. Overview of the Class Project Scope – Approximately the same as the sample project – Standard starting place Marketing.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Dimensions and parameters for the evaluation of e-learning Dr. Bernhard Ertl.
SCENARIOS ATP Winter On-line Workshop Compiled by Jim Valkenburg.
T Iteration Demo Software Trickery I2 Iteration
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
Project Management Plan Howard Community College Canvas Training Course Instructional Designer Ruddhi Wadadekar Presented to The Dean: Teaching and Learning.
CSE Senior Design I Architecture Design Review/Final Exam Template CSE 4316 Final Exam.
SARAH LEE GRACE UCHIDA MASIS NGUYEN MICHAEL HART JERAMY ZAPOTOSKY INF 132 Pair Programming.
Mobile App Upgrade and Migration Process mobile.semaphore-software.com.
BUS 611 Week 4 Assignment Integrated Project Management To purchase this material link
How to write an effective RFP
Collaboration Program CIO Council Update
Project Breakdowns HCDE 492/592 Winter 2014.
From: A. Cooper et al.: About Face Andreas Rudin
Lean Launch Pad prep for Week 3 : Customer Segments
Software Engineering Management
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
IE 8590 Capstone Design Project: Course Overview
Understanding how MIT faculty, students, and researchers work
How to Conduct Toileting Trials: A Webinar Course Evaluation
Greenhouse Scholars Impact Plan
EGEE and Induction Mike Mineter NeSC Training Team
Systems Analysis and Design
PROMOTION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
د. حنان الداقيز خريف /28/2016 Software Quality Assurance ضمان جودة البرمجيات ITSE421 5 – The components of the SQA.
Collaboration with Google Drive
Evaluating Navigation in Online Courses
Module 0: Introduction Chapter 2: Getting Started
Informatics 121 Software Design I
Kickoff Presentation Date of Presentation Presenter Name
Cycle 6 Detailed Schedule
Project Plan: Searching the UCI Library Website
Saad Ahmad Jola Bolaji Melvin Chien Maxwell Taylor
Client Needs Analysis & Competitors
RACIAL VIOLENCE ARCHIVE
Cycle 6 Detailed Schedule
Justin Ma Rodrigo Ramos Alex Terreri Alex Panganiban John Delshadi
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Group: Chris, Daniel, Jeff, Kathy, Shirelle, Vincent
INF 132: Project 2B Course Management System for Students
Usability of a Course Management System for Students
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Byung Kim, Danny Magsalin, Kathleen Enverga, Linda Kwok
Exergame Tracker Web App
Pair Programming Assistant
CS Chapter 3 (3A and ) Review
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
CS Chapter 3 (3A and ) Review
Human Computer Interface
Market problems & opport‘ies
CS Chapter 3 (3A and ) Review
Live Event resources Pre- event checklist Planning template
The atlas copco brand studio Make this Beautiful App
SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle) Role Play
Presentation transcript:

PROJECT GROUP 1A IN4MATX 132 Group 1A

PROJECT GROUP 1A MEMBERS ------> Group 1A

Project 1A by

Overview Introduction Customer Needs & Requirements HCI Methodology What is CANVAS? Customer Needs & Requirements Customer’s Goal Usability Focus Areas Customer’s View Initial Thoughts HCI Methodology Process Test Methods Target Users? Master Schedule

Introduction

What is CANVAS? Learning Management System (LMS) Multi-user levels Instructors Students Cloud-based Platform of course tools & resources Seamless integration w/100+ apps Developed by Instructure

Customer Needs & Requirements

Customer’s Goal Evaluate usability of CANVAS to determine the possibility of adopting the LMS and scale across campus

Usability Focus Areas Announcements Discussions People Files Outcomes Modules Collaborations Chat

Customer opinion withheld to limit bias Customer’s View Customer opinion withheld to limit bias

No prior assumptions to reduce biases Initial thoughts No prior assumptions to reduce biases

HCI Methododology

Process DEPLOY HCI METHODS & TEST USABILITY OF SYSTEM EVALUATE USABILITY ISSUES GATHER FINDINGS RE-TEST NEW DESIGN(s) WITH SOME OF THE EARLIER TEST PARTICIPANTS DRAFT MOCK-UP WITH RECOMMENDED CHANGES RE-EVALUATE USABILITY ISSUES GATHER FINDINGS

Test Methods Cognitive walkthrough Interviews Usability testing

Test Methods Interviews: will allow us to initially gauge the user experience, identify possible pain points, capture and refine the scope of the problem areas Cognitive walkthrough Usability testing

Test Methods Interviews: will allow us to initially gauge the user experience, identify possible pain points, capture and refine the scope of the problem areas Cognitive walkthrough: development of persona(s) & general list of tasks to discover global problems Usability testing

Test Methods Interviews: will allow us to initially gauge the user experience, identify possible pain points, capture and refine the scope of the problem areas Cognitive walkthrough: development of persona(s) & general list of tasks to discover global problems Usability testing: to discover more global problems, unique problems and to evaluate the overall usability of the LMS

Test Methods - Tasks & Questions A list of tasks will be generated based on the usability focus areas Interviews & cognitive walkthroughs will help us gather tasks and later refine the tasks flowing into the usability experiment Questions? Questions will be open-ended; providing a semi-structured interview flow to gauge UX, paint points and scope of problem area

Test Methods - Usability Metrics Error rate # of errors/ # of attempts per user = % of errors avg % of errors among all users Task completion rate # of completed tasks/ # of total tasks attempted = % of tasks complete Time needed to complete task avg time of all users per task

Test Methods - Logistics How will we contact users? via e-mail Where will we meet users? interviews: locations convenient for the user heuristics & usability testing: locations void of external distractions Length of meetings? interviews: 30 minutes to 1 hour heuristics & usability testing: 30 minutes to 1 hour+ (we do not want testers to get too bored/tired)

Target Users? Who? How many? Instructors Familiar and not familiar with canvas TA’s Professors How many? A total of 5 users (currently # of available contact opt-in)

Master Schedule

Master Schedule Week Deliverables Who? Week 3: Define schedule Start cognitive walkthrough Draft and finalize Interview Plan Interview instructors Draft Usability Test Plan Walkthrough (ALL). At least two members per interview. Interview 1 (John and Wilson). Schedule (George & John). Interview TP (George & John). Other TP Week 4: Finalize all test plans Continue interviews Start heuristic evaluations Compile list of tasks Prep test materials At least 2 members/ interview, depend on availability(ALL) Interview 2 (George). Finalize TP, Test Materials (Max & Wilson). List of tasks (Holly). Test

Master Schedule Week Deliverables Who? Week 5: Begin usability testing Everyone, depending on schedule and availability Week 6: Finish usability testing Qualitative & quantitative analysis Draft & test mock-up ALL, Mock-up (George, Max & Jonathan) Week 7: Test mock-up Re-evaluate usability issues, analysis Compile findings for Pre-Final Presentation & Project Report Draft Pre-Final Presentation Slide Deck & Project Report All members of the team will test the mock-up and will participate in the compilation of results. This is to ensure everyone is satisfied with final results.

Master Schedule Week Deliverables Who? Week 8: Review & finalize draft of Pre-Final Presentation Slide Deck Presentation practice Review & finalize Project Report All members of the team will participate in the compilation of results. This is to ensure everyone is satisfied with final results. Week 9: Pre-Final Presentation Week 10: Submit Project Report George

THANK YOU