Juvenile Justice Technical Assistance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Advertisements

California Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act Overview SB 678 Briefing San Francisco Regional AOC Office November 29, 2010 SB 678.
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
SCHOOL REFERRAL REDUCTION PROGRAM: Reducing Racial Disparities and the Criminalization of Low Risk Youth Center for Children’s Law & Policy Third Annual.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
 Which crimes were changed and how will those changes impact the State Courts?  How does the emphasis on the Accountability Courts movement affect prosecutors?
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Presentation Overview Juvenile Code Task Force Findings FAIR Team Overview Training Requirements Data Tracking Next Steps.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Task Force on Public Safety Oregon Criminal Justice Commission November 22, 2013.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Presentation Overview Juvenile Code Task Force Findings FAIR Team Overview.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Tearing Down the Walls Youth, Families, Activists and Advocates Reflect on De-incarceration Campaigns Youth First Initiative State Strategy Roundtable.
Enforcing Firearms Surrender
Joint Ad-hoc Tennessee Blue Ribbon Task Force on Juvenile Justice
Jail Diversion Programs
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
All Things CACJ Ms. Taylor Jones
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
Florida Civil Citation: History and Advocacy
Comprehensive Program Review - CJI -
Community Corrections 2018 Budget
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Community Corrections 2019 Budget
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Fulton County Justice & Mental Health Task Force
The Task Force The Honorable Shaun R. Floerke, Chief Judge of the Sixth Judicial District Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis County Attorney Daniel Lew, Chief Public.
How to Use Cost Benefit Analysis to Weigh Policy Options
Garry Herceg Consultant Pretrial Justice Institute
2014 Legislative Changes to Virginia’s Civil Commitment Laws
Residential Provider Oversight
Juvenile Data Exchange (JDEX) Technology Committee Presentation
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
WI Act 185 Implementation Update
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
General Counsel Andrew Bailey
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
SAVING FUTURES Juvenile Civil Citations Florida League of Women Voters
Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Justice Technical Assistance Coalition for Juvenile Justice Webinar October 23, 2014

The Pew Charitable Trusts is a nonprofit organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public, and stimulate civic life. Pew’s public safety performance project works with states to advance data-driven, fiscally sound policies and practices in the criminal and juvenile justice systems.

Holding juvenile offenders accountable Public Safety Performance Project Works with states to examine their juvenile justice systems to get a better public safety return on their juvenile justice spending. States are focusing on: Protecting public safety by improving outcomes for youth, families and the public Holding juvenile offenders accountable Controlling juvenile justice costs

Process of Pew’s Technical Assistance State selection Task force facilitation Legislative assistance Implementation support

State Selection: Alignment of Goals Undertake a comprehensive analysis of West Virginia’s juvenile justice system and data, and develop system-level recommendations, including proposals for statutory, budgetary, and administrative changes, to protect and promote public safety by –Improving outcomes for youth, families, and communities –Enhancing accountability for juvenile offenders and the system –Containing taxpayer costs by focusing system resources on serious juvenile offenders

Task Force Facilitation: Membership Executive branch Governor/Governor’s Designee Juvenile Justice agency director Children and Families agency director Judicial branch Chief Justice/Designee AOC Director Judges Probation Legislators Stakeholders Education Prosecutor Defense attorney Law enforcement County officials or local government

Task Force Facilitation: Key Components State selection Task force facilitation Legislative assistance Implementation support Step 1: Data analysis and system assessment Step 2: Policy development Step 3: Consensus building Ongoing: Stakeholder engagement

Task Force Facilitation: Report “The task force was vital to the process because it gave us that credibility and that unified voice to speak with when rolling out a package of legislative reforms.” John Tilley, Kentucky House of Representatives Judiciary Chair, Task Force Co-Chair

Legislative Assistance Georgia: HB 242 House: 173-0 Senate: 47-0 Governor signed on May 2, 2013 Reinvestment: $5 million Hawaii: HB 2490 House: 50-0 Senate: 24-0 Governor signed on July 2, 2014 Reinvestment: $1.26 million Kentucky: SB 200 House: 84-15 Senate: 32-6 Governor signed on April 25, 2014

Key Information Pew Provides Data Analysis Research State Examples

Data Analysis: Findings For example, in Georgia, the data revealed Low-level youth in out-of-home placement: 45 percent of youth in nonsecure residential beds were misdemeanants, 8 percent were status offenders; Increasing length of stay: Between 2002 and 2011, designed felon length of stay increased 13 percent; Poor outcomes: 65 percent of youth released from those beds recidivated after three years; and High taxpayer costs: Each secure bed cost Georgia $90,000 per year.

Data Analysis: Implications “It was a surprise to learn the facts about our juvenile population because you want to think that you are just committing those ‘bad’ kids and the fact is we really weren’t.” Judge Lisa Jones, District Court judge, Daviess County, Kentucky “When I started to look at the type of kids that we had at the correctional facility, I realized that the overwhelming majority of them were not a risk to public safety. So why did we have them in a correctional facility? Which got me looking at our entire system, and realizing that reform was just a must.” David Hipp, Executive Director, Office of Youth Services, Department of Human Services

Research: High Cost, Low Return of Residential Placements, Importance of Community Options Generally fail to produce better outcomes than alternative sanctions, Cost much more, and Can increase reoffending for certain youth. Community programming and practices are effective when systems: Use evidence-based tools, Match placement, supervision, and treatment to risk and need, Include treatment with surveillance, and Ensure quality service delivery Kentucky was spending its money in all the wrong ways. We were spending a lot of money on detention, particularly for low-level offenders, when we see that that's not a productive or an effective way to invest in the lives of those kids.” Whitney Westerfield, Kentucky Senate Judiciary Chair.

State Examples: Focus Out-of-Home Facilities on Higher-Level Offenders Georgia Creates a two-class system within the Designated Felony Act Prohibits status offenders and certain misdemeanants from residential commitment Kentucky Establishes an alternative, pre-court process for status cases Restricts commitment of lower-level felony offenders and misdemeanors Limits the length of out-of-home placement and length of supervision based on seriousness of the offense and risk to reoffend Requires graduated sanctions for probation violations and limits out-of-home to 30 days. Hawaii Prohibits misdemeanants from HYCF placement

State Examples: Build Community Options that Reduce Recidivism Georgia Establishes a voluntary fiscal incentive grant program Require evidence-based practices and assessments Allow lower level youth onto administrative caseloads Kentucky Requires use of objective, evidence-based tools in decision-making   Create fiscal incentive program Increases engagement and accountability of families Hawaii Require validated risk and needs assessment, case planning, sanctions and incentive system Allow earned discharge from probation

State Examples: Enhance Oversight and Ensure Performance Georgia Continue oversight with GA Council on Criminal Justice Reform Require performance-based contracting Require uniform data collection and tracking Kentucky Requires improved data collection and reporting to measure outcomes Establishes an Oversight Council Increase training and education   Hawaii Requires enhanced data and outcome reporting Creates a Juvenile Justice Oversight Advisory Council

Anticipated Results Over First 5 Years Georgia: Population: Reduced by 31% Savings: $85 million Hawaii: Population: Reduced by 60% Savings: $11 million Kentucky: Population: Reduced by 37% Savings: up to $24 million “…the most important change was ensuring that judges only send a kid to our secure facility, the Hawaii Youth Correctional Facility, if he is a threat to the public. Period.” Judge Mark Browning, Hawaii Family Court Judge.

Exploring Whether this Process is Right for Your State What’s the problem/issue your state would tackle? Is this the right time for state leaders to address that problem/issue?

Contact: Robin Olsen Manager, State Policy, Public Safety Performance Project The Pew Charitable Trusts (202) 540-6603 rolsen@pewtrusts.org