School Community Council

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
TRMS ACTION PLAN Goal #1 O Throughout the school year, core content teams will develop pedagogy and strategies to integrate Common.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2013/2014 Merriam Cherry Street.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Grading and Reporting Second Grade
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
SCC 11/11/14. SCC Agenda SCC Training  Acronyms of Education “Educationese”  SCC Roles & Responsibilities Emphasis on: ▫CSIP (Comprehensive School.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Imagine School at Town Center Academic Update June 17, 2014.
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
SCC MAY 12, KELLY TAUTEOLI APPROVE MINUTES FROM LAST MONTH.
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
 SCC October 22, Sign in Sheet & Welcome  Please specify if you have been to the SCC training  Last session is October 28 8 pm  Approval.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
Carol Revels, Senior Administrator.  Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in the following areas occur: Technology, Accountable Talk, ELA Instructional.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
SCC April 21, CSIP Plan Literacy A strategy for improvement is to provide targeted instruction in thesis development and utilization of textual.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
+ SCC March 17, CSIP Plan 3 areas – which we changed to 4 Literacy STEM Math Science PBIS.
Local Control & Accountability Plan Instructional Services Governing Board Presentation June 2, 2016.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Review of the Three - Tier Intervention Process
Outcomes, Goals, and Objectives
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
School Governance Council Meeting February 9, 2016
Grading and Reporting Second Grade
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
Tiger Academy Curriculum Committee
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
SCC September 15, 2016.
WELCOME.
Southmoreland Primary Center
PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school
Orchard Elementary School
School Improvement Team Winter Retreat February 26,2018
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016
School Community Council
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
LCAP Update November 19, 2014.
SCC 10/25/18.
School Community Council
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Agenda Topic Estimated Slides Estimated time Who We Are min.
2nd Grade Curriculum Night
New Prospect Elementary School
Florence Howard Elementary
Towers Elementary ELMAC
Continuous Improvement Plan Melissa Genson Change Leader
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
CSIP/Landtrust
Summit Hill Elementary School
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

School Community Council October 26, 2017

Welcome: Melinda Colton Introduce new SCC faculty member | Ms. Samantha Burton Approve Minutes from 9/28/17 Meeting

Review Bylaws SCC 101 is for new members SCC is for all members

Counselors’ Monthly Update: Kimberlee Montoya

Digital Citizenship: Kylie Arbon

Overview of CSIP Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Overarching Goal Increase student learning as shown by SAGE proficiency levels in math, science and writing.

Math Currently 63% of all students were scoring proficient on the 2015-2016 SAGE math. Our goal is that by the end of the 2017-2018 year, 68% of students will be proficient on the SAGE assessment. Progress toward this goal will be measured through formative assessments (SMI) 3 times throughout the year. Tier 1 & 2 – All Students Tier 3 – Math Lab Students

Learning Goal—What are teachers expected to learn and implement in the classroom? Common pacing will be consistent within 1-2 days in the regular and co-taught classrooms. This will support common administration of CFA (within 0-2 days), Comparison of data weekly, Intervention will be provided during class time at least once a week. Daily Tier 1 instruction will include grouping and strengthened explicit instruction with emphasis on "we do" & "y'all do". Explicit Instruction: I do, we do, y’all do, you do Math

How will progress toward this goal be monitored? Informal IPOP's will be conducted focusing on explicit instruction. Each math teacher will be observed twice informally during the first month of school. Peer observations will be conducted twice a year focusing on explicit instruction and grouping. Achievement of this process will be met when 80% of teachers are able to demonstrate a Level 3 or higher rating on the 1st indicator of the "Y'all Do" section of explicit instruction instrument by the 2nd informal observation. 80% of teachers will continue to demonstrate a Level 3 or higher on Peer Observation #1 and #2. Math

Action Plan & Professional Development Tasks/Action Steps/Events Timeline 1. Informal observations on explicit instruction. First month of school (August/September) 2. Peer observations Peer observations Q2 and Q3 3. Data examined and PD for teachers on explicit instruction & grouping Beginning in September, Ongoing throughout the year 4. Intervention students will use Chromebook for intervention software and all students will use Chromebook for Canvas Throughout the 2017-2018 school year. Math

Budget Expenditures Cost Source 1. Substitutes for peer observations $2200 ($100 per day for substitutes x 9 teachers x 2 days) Landtrust 2. Substitutes for data analysis $3300 ($100 per day for substitutes x 9 teachers x 3 days) 3. Purchase 6 more mobile labs for math $49000 (230 Chromebook and 6 carts) Total: $54,500 Math

Science Currently 76% of DPMS students are proficient on SAGE Science, scoring a 3 or 4. Our goal is that 77% of our overall student body will achieve proficiency on SAGE in science. Only 34% of our Special Education students are proficient on SAGE Science. Our goal is to increase proficiency of Special Education students to 40% in the 2017-18 school year. Progress will be measured by classroom unit summative assessment data. As required, the science curriculum will be updated for the 2017-2018 school year.

Learning Goal—What are teachers expected to learn and implement in the classroom? Teachers will focus on learning new science core curriculum, best teaching practices for small group instruction, explicit instruction for vocabulary, and spiraling of science instruction. Additionally, we will collaborate with grade-level Special Education teachers to meet the needs of individual students. Science

How will progress toward this goal be monitored? Progress will be monitored by using data from classroom unit assessments. Science

Action Plan & Professional Development Tasks/Action Steps/Events Timeline 1. Aides hired to assist in science. Professional development for three 17-hour aides. First month of school (August/September) 2. Substitutes provided for data analysis Throughout the 2017-2018 school year. Science

Budget Expenditures Cost Source 1. Substitutes for data analysis. (6 days) $5000 ($100 per day x 9 teachers x 6 days) Landtrust 2. Three 17-hour aides to assist in science classrooms $21,000 ($7000 per aide per year) 3. Teachers will provide the initial training for 17-hour aides $1500 (Aides $10.25 per hour x 3 aides x 16 hours) (Teachers $22.83 per hour x 2 teachers x 16 hours) 4. Science equipment will be purchased to support the instruction of the new curriculum. $20,000 Total: $47,500 Science

Writing: ELA & Social Studies SAGE ELA Data from 2015-2016 indicates that writing is the lowest reporting category for DPMS. 62% of our students are proficient, scoring a level 3 or 4, on the ELA portion of SAGE (2015-2016). Our goal is that at least 68% of our students will be proficient on the ELA SAGE in 2017-2018. A strategy for improvement is to provide targeted instruction in ELA and Social Studies classes in statement of purpose, utilization of evidence, and elaboration on evidence in student writing.

This is the same goal as last year The general breakdown average student improvement per category. Reading Lit (+10.20) Reading info text (+17.25) Listening Comp (+00.82) Writing (+41.00) Language  (-11.00)

Learning Goal—What are teachers expected to learn and implement in the classroom? Scaffolding- Common sentence frames, graphic organizers, rubrics, academic vocabulary, mentor texts with examples and non-examples Explicit Instruction Model- Including modeling and guided practice Writing

How will progress toward this goal be monitored? ELA- Common Formative Assessments at each grade level with similar rubrics (standards-based and vertically aligned) - ELA teachers will collect common formative assessment data in Canvas using the Mastery Gradebook function (internal coach will be added as a moderator and will pull this data for the school at the end of each quarter. ELA teachers will create a list of assessments for coach to pull.) SS- Common Formative Assessments at each grade level with similar rubrics (standards-based and vertically aligned) - SS teachers will collect common formative assessment data in Canvas using the Mastery Gradebook function (internal coach will be added as a moderator and will pull this data for the school at the end of each quarter. SS teachers will create a list of assessments for coach to pull.) Writing

Action Plan & Professional Development Tasks/Action Steps/Events Timeline 1. -ELA and SS teachers will provide timely feedback to students. Throughout the 2017-2018 school year. 2. Quarterly (three times a year), internal coach will pull Canvas data for ELA and SS teachers and ELA and SS teachers will meet separately to discuss vertical alignment (Friday morning, after school, OR data day) End of Q1, Q2, & Q3 3. ELA and SS teachers will meet to discuss SAGE data after SAGE implementation (Friday morning, after school, OR data day). Writing

Budget Expenditures Cost Source 1. -ELA teachers will attend a summer meeting to create vertical alignment $3000 (in-service rate $22.83) Landtrust 2. Social studies teachers will attend a summer meeting to create vertical alignment 3. Social studies teachers will attend a summer meeting to create & refine CFA’s 4. Three 17-hour aides will be hired to work with struggling students in Social Studies classes $21000 (Each aide $7000 per year x 3 aides) 5. Substitutes will be provided to ELA & Social Studies teachers three times a year in order to evaluate data and plan next steps. $5400 (ELA Substitute cost $100 x 18 teachers x 2 days) (Soc St Substitute cost $100 x 18 teachers x 1 day) Landtrust ($3000) Cell Tower Money ($2400) 6. iPads will be purchased to replace old iPads for ELA & Social Studies teachers $5000 (12-13 iPads) Total: $40,400 Budget Writing

School Climate Instructional minutes are lessened due to tardiness. Tardies by Period From the first day of school until February 2, 2017 Data from Skyward Class Period Recorded Tardies 1st 2599 2nd 500 3rd 502 4th 517 5th 569 6th 576 As of October 16th we have 536 tardies in 1st period.

Learning Goal—What are teachers expected to learn and implement in the classroom? Definitions of tardy and way late tardy. School and classroom procedures and expectations for being on time. School Climate

How will progress toward this goal be monitored? Progress will be monitored through Skyward. School Climate

Action Plan & Professional Development Tasks/Action Steps/Events Timeline 1. Teacher & Student training Throughout the 2017-2018 school year. 2. Parent Awareness 3. Reinforcements for On-Time Behavior School Climate

Budget Expenditures Cost Source 1. Rewards for students $2000 General Student Body Funds Total: $ 2,000 School Climate

Review 2017-18 School Land Trust Plan: Melinda Colton

Math

Science

Writing/Social Studies

Summary

Clubs: Kimberlee Montoya & Allyson Dunbar

Tardies & Courage Violations: Assistant Principal Jodi Roberts/Hollie Niebauer

Next SCC Meeting November 16, 3:00 p.m. Agenda items due November 8 Agenda posted November 9