4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Advertisements

Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Weighted Stacking of 3-D Converted-wave Data for Birefringent Media Richard Bale.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Least-squares Reverse Time Migration with Frequency-selection Encoding for Marine Data Wei Dai, WesternGeco Yunsong Huang and Gerard T. Schuster, King.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Presentation transcript:

4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Summary

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Summary

Geological Objectives Image Complex Structure Detect Gas Reservoir Over Salt

Problems Strong Guided Waves P-SV Conversion at Reflector ? How to Get “Pure” P-P and P-SV Strong Guided Waves

Problems for F-K Use only wave moveout Strong guided waves Near offset distortion

P-P and P-SV Waves Source P-P P-SV Point Scatterer

Least Squares Migration Filtering Moveout Particle Motion Direction Time + offset Separation

Separate P-P & P-S Suppress Guide Waves Improve Migration Image Objective Separate P-P & P-S Suppress Guide Waves Improve Migration Image

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Summary

LSMF with Moveout m p = L m = [ Lp Lps ] m m [L L] L d m = moveout PS -1 T = m ps PS P

LSMF with Moveout+2-Comp. Particle Motion P PS q (cos q , sin q ) (sin q , -cos q ) u = u + u p ps v = v + v total 2-component particle motion data p = L m = [ Lp Lps ] m p ps Scalar moveout m u = [ cos(q)Lp sin(q) Lps ] p ps Vector moveout + particle motion v = [ sin(q)Lp -cos(q) Lps ]

LSMF Method = > Dpp + Dp-s Lpp mpp P-P wave Time Lp-s mp-s P-S wave Observed data Dp-s Lp-s mp-s Lpp mpp Reflectivty Modeling Operator P-P wave Time P-S wave Offset

LSMF Filtering Step dpp = Lppmpp dp-s = Lp-smp-s P-P wave Time Time P-S wave Offset Time P-P wave Offset Time

LSMF Method Operators are constructed based on moveout and particle-motion direction The migration operators are the transposes of the modeling operators

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Summary

Examples Graben Model Mahogony Field Data

Graben Velocity Model 5000 X (m) Depth (m) 3000 V1=2000 m/s X (m) V1=2000 m/s V2=2700 m/s V3=3800 m/s Depth (m) V4=4000 m/s V5=4500 m/s 3000

FD Synthetic Data P-P P-S P-S P-P Horizontal Component Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 5000 P-P P-S Time (s) P-S P-P 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

LSMF Separation P-P P-S Horizontal Component Vertical Component Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) 5000 P-P P-S Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

F-K Filtering Separation Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) 5000 P-S P-P Time (s) P-S P-P 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

Test Results Indicate: LSMF works well for separating P-P and P-SV LSMF is superior to F-K filtering

Examples Graben Model Mahogony Field Data

Acquisition Survey Shot Line OBC 9 km 29 km

Main Processing Flow Geometry assignment, datuming and so on Trace edit, noise elimination, dual-sensor summation Amplitude Recovery Static correction, (F-K filtering), multiple suppression LSMF, velocity analysis Migration Output

Raw CSG Hydrophone component Vertical component Offset(m) Offset(m) -750 725 -750 725 Continuous events Continuous events Time (s) 4 Hydrophone component Vertical component

Raw CSG Radial component Transverse component Offset(m) Offset(m) -750 725 -750 725 Wormy events Wormy events Time (s) 4 Radial component Transverse component

Raw CRG Hydrophone component Vertical component X (m) X (m) Time (s) 3750 3750 Continuous events Continuous events Time (s) 4 Hydrophone component Vertical component

Raw CRG Radial component Transverse component X (m) X (m) Time (s) 3750 3750 Continuous events Continuous events Time (s) 4 Radial component Transverse component

Rough Estimate of Static Shift Source Receiver 12 p s Receiver static Static shift (ms) Source Receiver p s Shot static -4 100 Station Number

Data Analysis Indicates: The Shear static shifts exist These shifts mainly come from receivers and one-way Shear path from deeper reflector P-S waves originate from reflectors

CRG1 Data before Using LSMF Guided wave and P-S Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

CRG1 Data after Using F-K Filtering Unwanted waves remain Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

CRG1 Data after Using LSMF Less Noise remains Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

Prestack Migration Image With F-K Separation Midpoint (Km) 4.6 c Time (s) 3.5

Prestack Migration Image With LSMF Separation Midpoint (Km) 4.6 c Time (s) 3.5

A Zoom View of Box A Time (s) Midpoint (Km) Midpoint (Km) FK+Mig. 0.6 1.4 0.6 1.4 2.0 Time (s) 3.2 FK+Mig. LSMF+Mig.

A Zoom View of Box C Time (s) Midpoint (Km) Midpoint (Km) FK+Mig. 3.4 4.6 3.4 4.6 0.2 Time (s) 0.8 FK+Mig. LSMF+Mig.

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Xwell Data Summary

SSP Synthetic

Xwell

Outline Motivation and Objective LSMF Method Examples Graben Model Mahogany Field Data Summary

Summary and improves the migration image P-SV waves in Mahogony data originate from the deep reflectors LSMF gives better separation results and improves the migration image

Summary LSMF can eliminate unwanted noise, such as guided waves LSMF has negative impact on the fidelity of data to some extent

Summary Future Research: Multiple Elimination Prestack Depth Migration Converted Wave Imaging

Acknowledgement We are grateful to the 1999 sponsors of the UTAM consortium for financial support