Financial Transparency Working Group: Common Reporting Standards Part 2 August 25, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Advertisements

1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
1 West Contra Costa Unified School District December 17, First Interim Financial Report.
Evergreen School District Budget Advisory Committee January 21, 2015 January 21, 2015 BAC1.
Sampleville Schools County Comparisons and 10 Year Trends 1 District Logo here Prepared by: The Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB) (Logo here)
School Governance for Parents: SSC Fundamentals An Introduction to the School Site Council (SSC) and Your Role in Developing the Balanced Scorecard.
10 Things Every Charter Needs to Know About Finance Charter Conference – Session 3.1 – Charter Finance Basics April 23, 2013.
Presented by: Marguerite Roza Director, Edunomics Lab Associate Research Professor, Georgetown University
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
Presented by: Marguerite Roza Director, Edunomics Lab Associate Research Professor, Georgetown University
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. EXCESS COSTS Excess Cost Requirement –Prevents usage of Part B funds to pay for all costs directly attributable to the.
Equity and Opportunity in Education: The Road to the American Dream Ben Scafidi Kennesaw State University Senior Fellow: Georgia Public Policy Foundation.
ESE Chart of Accounts and Use of Finance Data MASBO Classified Personnel Training Program October 7, 2015 Melissa King, State Aid Coordinator, ESE.
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Student-Based Budgeting Task Force November 3, 2010 Matt Hill.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Completion Reports and Applications.
Financial Accounting II Lecture 42. Earnings Per Share (EPS) is widely used by investors as a measure of a company’s performance and is of particular.
Education Funding: How Much is Enough?
Georgetown University
Financial Transparency Working Group “FiTWiG” Uniform Procedure Work Session Feb. 9, 2017 Hosted by: Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
RI’s Uniform Chart of Accounts (UCOA)
School Board Presentation September 24, 2012
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Financial Literacy Savings
Financial Transparency Working Group: Office Hours March 13, 2017
Financial Transparency Working Need. Data. Now. How good is good enough? March 28, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
RI’s Uniform Chart of Accounts (UCOA)
Financial Transparency February 9, 2017
Financial Transparency Working Group: State Activity thus Far September 19, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Trimble County Public Schools
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in CALIFORNIA March 2015
( Annual Financial Report) Updated
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in ILLINOIS March 2015
Office Hours August 6, 2018 ©2018 Edunomics Lab, Georgetown University.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
Financial Transparency Working Group: Office Hours August 8, 2017
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Financial transparency displays:
Agenda Why school level financial data?
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEVADA March 2015
Financial Transparency Working Group: Equity Analyses September 7, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW JERSEY March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in PENNSYLVANIA March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in TENNESSEE March 2015
Communicating about Financial Transparency
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in DC March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW MEXICO March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in Wisconsin March 2015
Special Education Finance Updates 2016 MASBO Institute
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW YORK March 2015
ABASA Investment Company Proposal AGM Presentation - 22 September 2016.
Office of Federal and State Accountability
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Tracking State Progress
1) SEA rules: site vs. central 2) Shared service centers
2019 National ESEA Conference February 2, 2019| Kansas City, MO
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in MINNESOTA March 2015
Resource Allocation Reviews: Part 2!
Starting Community Conversations
New York State Education Department Rate Setting Update
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in LOUISIANA March 2015
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
PMISSC Summer 2018 Member Survey
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in ARIZONA March 2015
Child Nutrition Programs AND OCAS CODING
ESSA School Level Expenditure Reporting Requirement – What School Systems and School Leaders Need to Know.
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
Presentation transcript:

Financial Transparency Working Group: Common Reporting Standards Part 2 August 25, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University

Communicating During the Call To request to be unmuted, please use the hand raise tool Use the question box to ask questions or make a comment, and we will reply all so the group can see the question/comment & answer bscpcenter.org

Agenda Common reporting standards How far to go beyond the minimum, and for what purpose? Next meeting: Thursday, Sept. 7, 1-2pm ET

Toward common reporting standards Why? You asked. Goal was that optional “reporting” standards could enable school comparisons across states. Recognition that states have different systems. Start with minimum info. States can add as they go (outcomes, object, function, etc.). Common reporting standards would not prevent SEAs from adding more specific standards/requirements for their state. bscpcenter.org

Draft Common Reporting Standards: Student definition Each pupil counted as 1. Each SEA publicly defines a uniform student count procedure (e.g., ADA, ADM, one time count, etc.). School expenditure reports include enrollment. Where possible, enrollment by student type. Notes: #2 Different counts will yield different per pupil expenditures. It may be possible to create an enrollment count converter for comparisons across states. Other? bscpcenter.org

Draft Common Reporting Standards: Expenditures All LEA public expenditures are accounted for in the school- by-school totals (both school and central share), less any agreed upon exclusions. At a minimum, the real salaries of a school’s core staff would be attributed to the school level. Central expenditures can be attributed to schools via formula (per student, per staff, per student type, etc.) OR via state/local discretion. (E.g. the standards would not specify). Where feasible, central LEA expenditures are listed separately. The Grand Total for each school can be compared across districts/states/etc. SEAs/LEAs are welcome to create separate line items for expenditure types (food service, special ed?) so viewers can see their separate effects on overall spending. Notes: #2: What if states have different definitions of core staff? #3: What if central expenditures divided differently across states (and districts)? bscpcenter.org

Draft Common Reporting Standards Defn of School Expenditures are reported on behalf of the school that serves the students. (E.g. if one school receives money and students from another district, that school reports the spending on behalf of all students served). Where possible, schools would be categorized using common definitions (by level, virtual, charter, alternative?). Notes: #2 What categorizations do you currently have for school type? bscpcenter.org

Draft Common Reporting Standards Exclusions Notes: #2: What would you like to see excluded? Exclusions should be listed separately by LEA (not necessarily school level). Current exclusions: Adult ed Tuition paid for students placed outside the district’s schools Pass through funds Debt,  Capital. Food services? bscpcenter.org

Draft Common Reporting Standards Beyond the minimum What is the next most important info (after total expenditure and student count)? What does additional information tell us? For what use?

The goal: Enable useful comparisons across schools in different states, toward: equity, efficiency, and productivity Base Info Report Total spending on behalf of students in each school. Student counts (by type) Student outcomes by school Report Adj. for student type (by using growth, percentile by group, etc.) plus Several SEAs choosing obj/func as next most important info plus plus = Comparisons for Productivity Expenditures by student type Report Expenditures by object/function Report = More options, solutions, applications = Comparisons for Equity = Comparisons for Efficiency bscpcenter.org

What can we learn from these data? State average Should School 1 make changes to its spending? What other info would be useful?

Should schools spend a greater share on instruction? A B C D E

What can we learn from two schools that spend $ the same way but get different results? This is the same as slide 11, just put in a different way

What questions will your data answer? Data needed 1. How much does my school spend per pupil? 2. Is that more or less than other schools in my district? 3. Is that more or less than other schools with similar student demographics? 4. Is that more or less than other schools within the state? 5. Does my district divvy up funds equitably? 6. What is driving spending differences across schools? 7. What is included/excluded in the calculation? 8. How does my school's spending on services compare to that of other schools? (Are we able to get similar services for less, more?) 9. How does my schools' costs for different inputs compare to those of others? 10. Is there a school (or schools) that I can learn from? Specifically, is there one that has a similar level of funds (and similar demographics) but that is able to achieve much higher outcomes for their students? 11. Compared to peers, how well is my school able to leverage funds to achieve outcomes for students? Created by Edunomics Lab. For questions: Contact Edunomics@georgetown.edu

For your state or district, what is the ultimate goal, or the “why” around this financial transparency reporting? Equity Efficiency Productivity Other

The goal: Enable useful comparisons across schools in different states, toward: equity, efficiency, and productivity Base Info Report Total spending on behalf of students in each school. Student counts (by type) Student outcomes by school Report Adj. for student type (by using growth, percentile by group, etc.) plus plus plus = Comparisons for Productivity Expenditures by student type Report Expenditures by object/function Report = More options, solutions, applications = Comparisons for Equity = Comparisons for Efficiency bscpcenter.org

Next meeting: September 7, 1-2pm ET In-person meeting coming up: Preferred month? (Jan? Feb?) Topics you’d like covered so we can plan valuable sessions? bscpcenter.org

Other potential slides…