Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Advertisements

The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Volume 137, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Expansion of Interstitial Telomeric Sequences in Yeast
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Latent Regulatory Potential of Human-Specific Repetitive Elements
Evolutionary Rewiring of Human Regulatory Networks by Waves of Genome Expansion  Davide Marnetto, Federica Mantica, Ivan Molineris, Elena Grassi, Igor.
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Adaptive Amplification
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
TALEN-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair of CTG Trinucleotide Repeats
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Sarah K. Deng, Yi Yin, Thomas D. Petes, Lorraine S. Symington 
Yeast Origins Establish a Strand Bias for Replicational Mutagenesis
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Comprehensive, Fine-Scale Dissection of Homologous Recombination Outcomes at a Hot Spot in Mouse Meiosis  Francesca Cole, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin  Molecular.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Chandan Shee, Janet L. Gibson, Susan M. Rosenberg  Cell Reports 
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Robert E. Johnson, Roland Klassen, Louise Prakash, Satya Prakash 
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Large-Scale Expansions of Friedreich's Ataxia GAA Repeats in Yeast
Junko Kanoh, Mahito Sadaie, Takeshi Urano, Fuyuki Ishikawa 
Division of Labor at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Spontaneous Changes in Ploidy Are Common in Yeast
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Alteration in the choice of DNA repair pathway with increasing sequence selective DNA alkylation in the minor groove  Natalie Brooks, Peter J McHugh,
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Mutational Analysis of Ionizing Radiation Induced Neoplasms
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 424-435 (May 2012) Clustered Mutations in Yeast and in Human Cancers Can Arise from Damaged Long Single-Strand DNA Regions  Steven A. Roberts, Joan Sterling, Cole Thompson, Shawn Harris, Deepak Mav, Ruchir Shah, Leszek J. Klimczak, Gregory V. Kryukov, Ewa Malc, Piotr A. Mieczkowski, Michael A. Resnick, Dmitry A. Gordenin  Molecular Cell  Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 424-435 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Multiple Mutation Reporters Presented are yeast strains with URA3 (blue) and CAN1 (orange) separated by either 0.9 kb inserted into LYS2 (adjacent reporters) to the left (A) or right (B) of ARS216 (red) on chromosome II, or by 83 kb on the left arm of chromosome V (separated reporters; C). Isolates that were mutant in both genes were selected by resistance to the drugs 5-FOA and canavanine. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Selection and Characterization of Mutation Clusters FOA-CAN mutation frequencies for wild-type haploid (1n) and diploid (2n) yeast carrying the adjacent (Adj) or separated (Sep) URA3-CAN1 reporters (see Figure 1, reporters A and C). Selected isolates were sequenced. (A) The median number of colonies per plate. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals (CI). “ALL” represents colonies from MAT a/α, α/α, and a/a combined. LOH adjusted values are indicated (see also Table S2, Supplemental Information). (B) An example FOA-CAN-resistant genome (named Cra3): gray bars represent each of the 16 yeast chromosomes, the red line indicates the location of URA3 and CAN1, and blue lines denote the position of mutations. A segment of chromosome II containing a mutation cluster is enlarged. Cluster lengths (C), the number of mutations per cluster (D), and cluster p values (E) of all sequenced chromosome II clusters arising from cells treated with 2 (white circles) or 4 mM (gray circles) are presented. Black circles indicate unselected clusters. Solid lines indicate median values. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MMS-Induced Mutated Base Pairs The total mutated A:T and C:G base pairs in FOA-CAN dually resistant wild-type haploid and diploid yeast carrying the URA3-CAN1 reporter selected after 2 day exposure to 2 or 4 mM MMS were divided based upon whether they were clustered (C) or scattered (S). “N” indicates scattered mutations for isolates where no FOA-CAN selection was applied. Mutations in URA3 and CAN1 as well as annotated repeat regions including LTRs and retrotransposons were excluded from totals. P values were determined with two-sided Fisher's exact test (see also Figure S2). Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Strand Coordination of Clustered Mutations Each line (numbers represent the data set cluster ID from Table S4B) depicts the mutated cytosines (red circles) and guanines (green circles) in the sequenced strand of a FOA-CAN selected cluster containing more than three guanines and/or cytosines originating from the indicated wild-type strains carrying the adjacent URA3-CAN1 reporter treated with either 2 or 4 mM MMS. Only mutations at C and G bases are depicted. The complete mutation data, including the mutations at A and T bases, are presented in Figure S1 and Table S4B. Clusters are separated into two categories, (A) nonswitching clusters and (B) switching clusters. A coordination switch is defined as two or more consecutive coordinated mutations followed by at least two consecutive coordinated mutations of the opposite base. Approximate break points are indicated by arrows. Within categories, clusters are sorted by genotype, by MMS treatment, and finally by cluster length. Clusters labeled with data set cluster IDs 131,148, and 152 are presented as a subpanel within (A), since they require a significantly different scale than the remaining nonswitching clusters. (C) Model of MMS-induced clusters caused by N3-methyl cytosine adducts in the single-strand overhangs of resected DSBs. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Replication-Associated Clusters (A) Possible causes of ssDNA at dysfunctional forks. Breakage of the leading-strand template would produce a similar outcome as breakage of the lagging-strand template and thus is omitted for simplicity. Expected biases of mutated cytosines (red circles) and/or guanines (green circles) in the sequenced strand depend on their location relative to the replication origin. (B) FOA-CAN mutation frequencies induced with 2 mM MMS. Error bars indicate 95% CI. (C) The URA3 and CAN1 open reading frames of selected clones from (B) were PCR amplified and Sanger sequenced. Isolates containing G-G or C-C strand-coordinated mutations were tabulated. P values were calculated by two-tailed g test for goodness of fit to an expected 1:1 ratio. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mutation Clusters in Sequenced Human Cancers (A) Mutation clusters in non-SHM regions separated by type of strand coordination (“A- or T-” coordinated, “G- or C-” coordinated, and “non-” coordinated). White bars indicate the number of clusters colocalized with breakpoint(s). Colocalization was registered when the region covered by the cluster plus left and right flanks of 20,000 nucleotides contained at least one breakpoint. Black bars depict the number of clusters not associated with a specific breakpoint. (B) Number of mutations from the coordination classes in (A) that occurred within specific sequence motifs. Numbers above bars indicate the fold enrichment of clustered mutations occurring at a motif over the frequency of the motif occurs in the chromosomal sequence that the cluster spans (see Cluster Sequence in Table S9). Asterisks demark motifs significantly enriched in mutation clusters (p value < 0.0001) as determined by chi-square (see also Figure S3). (C) Distribution of mutations within 17 C-coordinated clusters with greater than three mutations. Mutated cytosines are categorized by their presence in a TC motif (pink and white striped diamonds), TCW motif (red diamonds), or no identified motif (pink circles). Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Genome-wide Prevalence of Mutated Motifs in Sequenced Human Cancers (A) Median fold enrichment of genome-wide mutations at various motifs (motifs identified in clusters plus CpG − CG/CG and the AID target motif − WRC/GYW). Numbers above bars indicate the fold enrichment of mutations occurring at a motif over the frequency of the motif in a fraction of sequence representative of the each genome. The enrichments of TC/GA and TCW/WGA also were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. (B) Fraction of total mutations occurring at the motifs described in (A) for individual sequenced tumors (circles). The horizontal bar indicates the median value (see also Figure S4). Molecular Cell 2012 46, 424-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions