Administrative Instructions – Short Version (Option 2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Slide – Technology or Company Name
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Business and Administrative Communication SIXTH EDITION.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process Lecture 7c – How to Ask for Action or Propose Policy on Behalf of a Group.
[Organization’s Name] [Author’s Name] [Date]
Office of Information Technology (OIT) PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENTS - BUSINESS CASE, ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
Instructore: Tasneem Darwish1 University of Palestine Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Software Engineering Department Requirement engineering.
1 Hair, Babin, Money & Samouel, Essentials of Business Research, Wiley, REPORTING AND PRESENTING RESEARCH Chapter 12 Learning Objectives: 1.Convey.
The Staff Study Individual Requirement Introduction and Overview.
Communication 2 Report Writing.
© Prentice Hall, 2008 Business Communication Today, 9eChapter Writing Reports and Proposals.
Project Report. Suggested TOC Executive Summary Project Background and Assumptions Vision and Mission Statements Objectives SWOT Analysis Recommended.
16-1 Chapter 16 Analyzing Information & Writing Reports   Analyzing Data   Choosing Information   Organizing Reports   Seven Organization Patterns.
Writing a Research Proposal 1.Label Notes: Research Proposal 2.Copy Notes In Your Notebooks 3.Come to class prepared to discuss and ask questions.
Chapter 13. Writing Recommendation Reports © 2013 by Bedford/St. Martin's1 Recommendation reports address four kinds of questions: What should we do about.
Chapter 19. Writing Recommendation Reports © 2010 by Bedford/St. Martin's1 Recommendation reports address four kinds of questions: What should we do about.
Writing Proposals Nayda G. Santiago Capstone CpE Jan 26, 2009.
15 The Research Report.
REPORTS.
Report writing. What is a report?? Record of a particular event. The literal meaning of the word report is a collection of formal or official statements,
Outlines Overview Defining the Vision Through Business Requirements
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Type your project title here Your name Mueller Park Junior High
Recommendation reports address four kinds of questions:
Recommendation reports address four kinds of questions:
C. What is a Feasibility report
Project Initiation.
MEmos.
Chapter 21 Informal Reports
Chapter 23 Proposals Whether your course is basic or accelerated, you should include some practice in proposal writing. As time permits, have students,
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Writing the research protocol
Technical Report Writing
FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility study is a means to check whether the proposed system is correct or not. The results of this study arte used to make decision.
Chapter 18 Formal Reports
Cost Benefit Analysis Supporting Army Enterprise Decision Making
Proposal/Initiative Title
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
STATUS REPORT.
Cost-Benefit Analysis Training: APS Case Study (cont’d)
Cost-Benefit Analysis Training: APS Case Study (cont’d)
The Strategic Planning Process
Administrative Instructions – Detailed Version (Option 1)
Welcome to our presentation
[Project Name] Project Gating Presentation
Lab Report Template.
Informed Consent (SBER)
Read to Learn Describe how to prepare for your own business. Discuss the parts of a business plan.
Understanding Types of Formal Reports
Basic Marketing Research Customer Insights and Managerial Action
Read to Learn Describe how to prepare for your own business. Discuss the parts of a business plan.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Goal-Driven Continuous Risk Management
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Formal reports are distinguished from informal letter and memo reports by their length and by their components. Though long reports can vary in format.
Goal-Driven Software Measurement
Getting Ready for IPMA Level D® Certification in the USA
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
A Commercialization Strategy for (your business/company name)
Gender Training Workshop Name of Institution Place Date
MGT/465 SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL PLANNING The Latest Version A+ Study Guide // uopcourse.com
MGT 465 UopStudy Guide // uopstudy.com
MGT/465 SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL PLANNING The Latest Version // uopcourse.com
MGT 465 MGT465 mgt 465 mgt465 Entire Course // uopstudy.com
PROJECT NAME YOUR LOGO [ NAME ] [ DATE ] BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION
Description of Change(s)
Presentation transcript:

Administrative Instructions – Short Version (Option 2) The following set of slides reflects suggested content for a briefing to a decision maker. These slides are a format and / or a template to guide the briefer in addressing the key elements of a CBA in a logical, easy to follow way. They also may be adapted for the purpose of documenting a CBA. CBA preparers may use this set to build their own briefing slides. DASA-CE does not mandate their use. CBA preparers know best what their decision-maker/leadership would like to see in a briefing. Note: The CBA Portal also contains a second set of slides (Option 1) which provides a generic way of documenting and /or briefing a CBA using PowerPoint. It is a little longer (more detailed) than this one. The CBA portal is located at: https://cpp.army.mil. Both sets of slides provide possible ways of answering the often asked question: What does a CBA look like or contain?” Need help? Contact us at: usarmy.pentagon.hqda-asa-fm.mbx.army-cost-benefit-analysis@mail.mil

Title of Cost Benefit Analysis Name of Submitting Organization CBA Creator/ POC: Name – Phone Number Cost Estimator: Name – Phone Number Date Created: January 1st 2013

Background & Executive Summary Executive Summary: Provide the “Bottom-Line Up Front” Background: The background and circumstances section of the brief should define and illustrate the current state/condition and what caused the problem or opportunity to occur. The background provides the contextual information needed to fully understand what caused the problem, need or opportunity addressed in the analysis.

Problem, Objective & Scope Problem/ Opportunity: The problem statement clearly defines the problem, need, or opportunity that requires a solution. Objective: The objective describes what the effort intends to accomplish. Objectives should be measurable, realistic, achievable, and results-oriented. Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Scope: The Scope defines the range of coverage encompassed by an initiative or proposal along specific dimensions like time, location, organization, technology or function. Describe what is in and out of scope and why.

Constraints of Analysis Facts: A fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by evidence. Include only relevant facts – those items of information that have a direct bearing on the CBA being developed. Fact 1: Fact 2: Fact 3: Fact 4: Assumptions: Assumptions are factors or conditions that are essential to the success of the solution and are beyond the control of the organization. Assumptions define the ground rules and accepted statements in order to limit the scope of the CBA. They are explicit statements of conditions on which the CBA is based. Assumption 1: Assumption 2: Assumption 3: Assumption 4:

Courses of Action COA 1 – Status Quo COA 2 – Name of COA Attribute of COA: The status quo (also known as the “As-Is” state), is the “baseline” program, system, or situation against which the costs and benefits of all feasible alternatives are compared. COA 2 – Name of COA Attribute of COA: Description of alternative COA. Include any relevant 2nd and 3rd order effects, risks, etc. COA 3 – Name of COA Attribute of COA: Description of alternative COA. Include any relevant 2nd and 3rd order effects, risks, etc. COA 4 – Name of COA Attribute of COA: Description of alternative COA. Include any relevant 2nd and 3rd order effects, risks, etc.

Cost Factors & Estimates COA 1 – Status Quo: $XM (FYX – FYZ Constant/ Current $) Cost Factor 1: Cost Factor 2: Cost Factor 3: Cost Factor 4: COA 2 – Name of COA: $XM (FYX – FYZ Constant/ Current $) Cost Factor 1: Cost Factor 2: Cost Factor 3: Cost Factor 4: COA 3 – Name of COA: $XM (FYX – FYZ Constant/ Current $) Cost Factor 1: Cost Factor 2: Cost Factor 3: Cost Factor 4: COA 4 – Name of COA: $XM (FYX – FYZ Constant/ Current $) Cost Factor 1: Cost Factor 2: Cost Factor 3: Cost Factor 4:

Selection Criteria & Decision Matrix Benefits/ Selection Criteria (1) Mission Accomplishment: Enables organization to accomplish prescribed mission. (2) Benefit Title – Description of benefit. (3) Benefit Title – Description of benefit. (4) Benefit Title – Description of benefit. (5) Benefit Title – Description of benefit. COA 1 COA 2 COA 3 COA 4 Selection Criteria Weight Rating Score (1) Mission Accomplishment 20.0% 9 1.80 6 1.2 5 1.00 (2) Title of Benefit or Selection Criteria 7 1.40 8 1.6 4 0.80 (3) Title of Benefit or Selection Criteria 2 0.40 (4) Title of Benefit or Selection Criteria 0.8 1.60 (5) Title of Benefit or Selection Criteria 1.4 1 0.20 Total Score 100% 8.6 6.6 3.2 8.2 Scaled Benefits 100 860 660 320 820 Cost (FYX - FYZ)   $2,190 $2,379 $1,450 $1,970 Cost Benefit Index 2.5 3.6 4.5 2.4

Recommendation Recommendation: Results and recommendations summarize the findings of the analysis and make conclusive statements about the comparisons of alternatives.    Describe the value proposition: a concise statement that describes the results or value a decision maker can expect from adopting a specific recommendation arising from the CBA.