Runway Throughput Daric Megersa SYS 461.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airport ATC Capacity Research Programme
Advertisements

Modeling Airport Capacity
Kimberly Afcha and Danielle Hettmann Measure of capacity of the runway Based on the following assumptions: Continuous supply of arrivals and/or departures.
Runway Capacity.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 12: Service processes and flow variability Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin.
S. D. Deshmukh OM V. Capacity Planning in Services u Matching Supply and Demand u The Service Process u Performance Measures u Causes of Waiting u Economics.
1 Chapter 8 Queueing models. 2 Delay and Queueing Main source of delay Transmission (e.g., n/R) Propagation (e.g., d/c) Retransmission (e.g., in ARQ)
THE PROGRESS IN RUNWAY CAPACITY AT SPANISH AIRPORTS PICAP (Airport ATC capacity research programme) ICRAT 2004 MIGUEL ANGEL BUENO Aeronautical Engineer.
Vehicle Flow.
1 1 Capacity Measurements in Airport Sector: Drawbacks of Conventional Methods and Benchmarking Airports Using Declared Capacity Tolga Ülkü Presented in:
1 Methodology for Estimating Airport Capacity and Performance Using PDARS Data Yu Zhang, Jasenka Rakas, Eric Liu March 16th Asilomar, Pacific Grove,
HUGHES PROPRIETARY NYC – Hamptons Southern Route.
Presented to: By: Date: File: apo130\Airport Efficiency\TAER SAER Updated Briefing(2).ppt 1030 Federal Aviation Administration Presentation of System Airport.
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
Queuing models Basic definitions, assumptions, and identities Operational laws Little’s law Queuing networks and Jackson’s theorem The importance of think.
Landing Safety Analysis of An Independent Arrival Runway
1 Chapters 8 Overview of Queuing Analysis. Chapter 8 Overview of Queuing Analysis 2 Projected vs. Actual Response Time.
Analysis and Design of Asynchronous Transfer Lines as a series of G/G/m queues.
= constant speed forward = no speed, stopped = constant speed; negative direction Time (s) Distance mDistance m.
Probabilistic Robotics
XC 2: Flying Further and Faster. The Plan The polar curve and performance Flying Further – maximising the glide Flying faster – in theory In practice.
Do Now! Can you put the syllabus and Definition list in your folders for our new topic Topic 2: Mechanics.
Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.
Analysis and Design of Asynchronous Transfer Lines as a series of G/G/m queues.
Queuing Theory Simulation & Modeling.
Exploratory Study of Demand Management Using Auction-Based Slot Allocation L. Le, S. Kholfi, G.L. Donohue, C-H Chen Air Transportation Systems Engineering.
Linear Motion. Displacement The change in position for a given time interval.
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
Measurements of Wake Vortex Separation at High Arrival Rates: Proposal for a New WV Separation Philosophy 5th Eurocontrol/FAA ATM R&D Conference
OBJECTIVES Direct the aircraft on the ground and in the air by Ground-based Controllers Separate aircrafts to prevent collisions, Organize and arrange.
EUROCONTROL Wake Vortex Projects
Unit-3 FLIGHT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Capacity and delays at Newark Airport, theoretical and experimental approaches Thomas Morisset.
VARIOUS KINDS OF SEPARATION
Managing Flow Variability: Safety Capacity
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
Two-Dimensional Kinematics
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Chp. 4: Speed, Velocity, and Acceleration
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Analysis and Design of Asynchronous Transfer Lines as a series of G/G/m queues: Overview and Examples.
Dynamic wake turbulence separation Saulo da Silva
UNIT -4 AERODROME DATA.
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
Lecture on Markov Chain
UA Road Transport Safety Forum Hazard & Effects Management Program
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Queueing Theory Carey Williamson Department of Computer Science
Queuing models Basic definitions, assumptions, and identities
Delays Deterministic Stochastic Assumes “error free” type case
Ch.5, Sec.1 – Measuring Motion
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
DCA, A Pilot’s Perspective
Queuing models Basic definitions, assumptions, and identities
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
Speed, Velocity and Acceleration
Pilot considerations and pilot solutions
Unit 1 1D Motion.
Delays Deterministic Stochastic Assumes “error free” type case
Carey Williamson Department of Computer Science University of Calgary
“Established on RNP” Jeff Williams – IATA
How Air Traffic is Coordinated
Chapter-5 Traffic Engineering.
Motion, Speed, Velocity and Acceleration
Dynamic wake turbulence separation Saulo da Silva
Graphs of Motion.
EMMANUEL MENANTEAU CEO of Cambodia Airports. EMMANUEL MENANTEAU CEO of Cambodia Airports.
Speed & D-T Graph
Presentation transcript:

Runway Throughput Daric Megersa SYS 461

Runway Throughput Key Terms Maximum Throughput Capacity (MTC) Runway Occupancy time (ROT) Simultaneous Runway Occupancy(SRO) Inter_Arrival separation Compression and Expansion cases http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

What is Runway Throughput ? Maximum Throughput Capacity(MTC)- It’s a measure of the capacity of a runway. It defines the average movements(both arrival and departure) that can be performed in an hour time. Assumption made when measuring Runway throughput Non-stop arriving /departing aircrafts No simultaneous runway occupancy(SRO) ATC separation due to Wake-vortex Additional buffer distance to void separation rules Fleet Mix Final approach path distance http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for Homogeneous Fleet Mix The capacity of the runway to meet SRO (Simultaneous Runway Occupancy) runway determined ROT (runway occupancy time) = 3600sec/ ROT The runway throughput for a runway to account for the Wake Vortex Separation Distance requirements is determined by the separation distance. The average ROT typically ranges from 45 seconds for small aircraft to 70 seconds for large aircraft. The MCT for a fleet of homogeneous aircraft with ROT of 60 seconds http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for Homogeneous Fleet Mix The Runway Throughput for a runway, to meet only the Wake Vortex Separation Rule, for a homogeneous fleet mix, is determined by the time between arriving aircraft at the runway threshold, known as inter-arrival time (t). =3600/(s/v) http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for Homogeneous Fleet Mix The Runway throughput for a runway with homogeneous fleet mix to account for the ATC/Controller Separation Buffer for maintaining Wake Vortex Separation Distance requirements is determined by the separation distance plus the buffer distance. = 3600/((s/v) + b), where t = (s/ v) + b http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for a Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix Runway capacity for non-homogeneous dependent on the fleet mix on the runway. Fleet mix on the runway represented by the probability of each aircraft arriving Ex - Fleet mix for ATL http://atsl-g4-733.cee.vt.edu/courses/cee5614/cee5614_pub/Capacity_example_time_space.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for a Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix The Runway Throughput for a runway, to meet only the Simultaneous Runway Occupancy (SRO) rule, for a non-homogeneous fleet mix, is determined by ROT (in sec) Probability of the lead-follow (of Fleet Mix) = 3600/E[ROT] E[ROT]= = ∑i (pi *ROTi) http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for a Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix The Runway throughput for a runway, to meet only the Wake Vortex Separation Rule, for a nonhomogeneous fleet mix, is determined by: The separation distance between the lead and the follow The groundspeed of the aircraft The probability of a lead-follow pair http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for a Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix The time between the lead and follow aircraft is known as the inter-arrival time (tij) and is represented by the Inter-arrival Time Matrix T the Inter-Arrival Time Matrix T, is computed as follows: r=length of the approach path http://catsr.ite.gmu.edu/SYST460/RunwayCapacityWorkbook.pdf

Runway Throughput Capacity for a Non-Homogeneous Fleet Mix Compression Case- When the lead aircraft is slower than the follow aircraft, the follow aircraft will catch up Separation Cases- When the lead aircraft is faster than the follow aircraft, the follow aircraft drops back from the lead aircraft as they fly constant speed down the approach path. to the lead aircraft as they fly constant speed down the approach path. For example, for the Fleet mix provided above earlier (ATL airport), the probability of a Large following a Large = 0.785 * 0.785 = 0.616