Ch 4: Personality and Abilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team “Japan” BA352 Section 005
Advertisements

Test Development.
PERSONALITY & INDIVIDUAL
Exploring Management Chapter 12 Individual Behavior.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES: PERSONALITY AND ABILITIES
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Appreciating Individual Differences: Self-Concept, Personality,
Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.
Ch 3: Personality (cont.) & Abilities Part 2: Feb 1, 2007 Note: there is some overlap of first slides w/Part 1 material not covered on 1/30.
Ch 3: Personality and Abilities Part 1 – Jan 30, 2007.
Chapter 3 – Perception and Learning Part 2: Learning Feb. 3, 2009.
9 Chapter Foundations of Individual Behavior Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 9-1.
© Pearson Education Limited 2015
Ch 4: Personality and Abilities Part 1 – Jan 31, 2008.
+ Big Five Personality Tests have Substantial Weaknesses By: Kelly Kubec and Jacob Toscano.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EI) Presented by Derrick Lottes.
Emotional Intelligence
Human Resources Training and Individual Development Personality Theories and Assessment March 3, 2004.
9 Chapter Foundations of Individual Behavior Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education9-1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Social Cognitive & Trait Theories
Module 20 Social Cognitive & Trait Theories. SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY Definition –says that personality development is shaped primarily by three forces:
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES: PERSONALITY AND ABILITY
Personality in the Workplace Module from SIOP. Personality in the Workplace Personality includes the unique ways people think, act, and behave Personality.
Individual Differences Chapter 4 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES: PERSONALITY. PERSONALITY  Unique set of traits and characteristics that are relatively stable over time and determine a person’s.
Study of Personality Personality Psychologists investigate the influence of culture, learning, biological and cognitive factors in the development of personality.
Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2014) Prepared by: Christopher J. L. Cunningham, PhD University.
Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc.9-1 Chapter 9 Foundations of Individual Behavior.
What Is Leadership? © 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Leadership The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals Management.
Emotional Intelligence
CHS AP Psychology Unit 10: Personality
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Assessing Musical Behavior
Ch. 5 Measurement Concepts.
Principles of Quantitative Research
Chapter 11 Assessing Via Inventories and Interviews (2nd ed)
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
Understanding Personality, Values and More
Personality notes 15-5 Objectives (14-19)
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
Trait Units.
Measurement: Part 1.
Test Validity.
Foundations of Individual Behavior
Personality Psychology
Unit 4 – Personality, Attitudes, and Social Influence
EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY Unit 6 – Part 2 Intelligence Ms. Markham.
Human Resource Management By Dr. Debashish Sengupta
Chapter 2 Personality Research Methods
CHAPTER 13 Leadership Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald E. Riggio.
Definition Slides.
Behaviorist Theory of Personality 1
Myers EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (6th Edition in Modules)
Win May USC Keck School of Medicine
Chapter 5 (Part 3): Recruitment & Selection
Personality An individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.
is clear, concise, and easy to read and understand
Basic Approaches to Leadership
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
Basic Approaches to Leadership.
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
Trait perspective.
Individual Differences: Personality, Skills, and Abilities
CONCEPTS TO BE INCLUDED
Chapter 11 Assessing Via Inventories and Interviews (2nd ed)
Identity development examples
Personality traits are internal characteristics that are stable, consistent over time, and displayed through multiple situations. Trait theories predict.
Personality An individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.
Presentation transcript:

Ch 4: Personality and Abilities Part 1 – Feb. 5, 2009

Personality Unique and stable pattern of behaviors, thoughts, emotions Interactionist approach – behavior result of personality and situation When does it have the most influence? How is personality measured? Objective – Projective –

Controversy: Personality in Selection 3 points – historically, conventional wisdom in psych was that personality measures… 1) 2) 3) What is the current view of personality in the I/O literature?

Taxonomies Terminological confusion abounds! 1 answer is Big 5 model Many researchers agree most measures assess at least the “Big 5” Check to make sure you assess these 5 reliably, validly… Anything extra is optional Accepted Big 5 measure is “NEO”

Big 5 Model 5 key dimensions of personality (know def of each…) Openness to Experience – Conscientiousness – Extraversion – Agreeableness – Neuroticism (or its opposite, positively-termed “emotional stability”) –

Does personality predict job performance? As recently as ’90, most said ‘no’ Barrick & Mount (1991) What did this study suggest? Later studies found C & A predict job perf about as well as what other construct? (correlation range?)

Cont.. Conscientiousness most highly related to job performance (of the Big 5 dimensions) related to …? But jobs where this isn’t good? And why?

Faking personality scores What is the controversy? Hogan & Hogan’s view: (they publish the HPI) Some items are transparent & easy to fake, is this a problem? How can methodology be used to assess faking? How do corrections for faking affect validity? Their conclusion?

Levin & Zickar (2002) “Self-presentation, lies, and bullshit” What is their issue with the Hogans’ conclusions? Levin & Zickar distinctions: Field studies compared those instructed to fake w/those instructed to be honest: What did they find?

Other Personality Constructs Positive/Negative Affectivity (PA/NA) – stable mood Strong relationship with job satisfaction Is there such a construct as group affect (or affective tone?) How could we measure this?

Abilities Capacity to perform a task Intellectual abilities Cognitive ability (g): general intelligence, reasoning Traditionally most importance placed on this (IQ tests) Highly related to job perf Practical Intelligence – devise effective ways to get things done

Will ‘g’ & conscientiousness do the job? Focus on precise matching of applicant abilities w/those required by job? Or focus on conscientiousness & ‘g’? Distinguish between dependent variables used in studies In past, focused on ? Current focus shifting to ? Final choice of which to use may depend on…

When to focus on g & cons. Focus on g & cons when… 1) 2) 3) Otherwise focus on precise matching of skills with job