ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Chapter 7 The Use of Hearsay in the Courtroom. 2 WITNESSES AND THE HEARSAY RULE When witnesses give their testimony, the subject matter is typically.
Advertisements

Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation FITZPATRICK,
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
Prior Statements By Testifying Witnesses 801(d)(1)
CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
THE LAW OF HEARSAY. DEFINITIONS: A. “Statement” An oral or written assertion or Non verbal conduct, if it is intended as an assertion B. “Declarant” A.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Confronting the Confrontation Objection: Crawford Update Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill October, 2006 © 2006 Click Here for Sound.
Chapter 7 The Use of Hearsay in the Courtroom.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY Prior Inconsistent Statement, Prior Consistent Statements, Prior Identifications.
A Federal Defender’s Guide to Confrontation Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
ACOS 1, 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation The investigator and the legal system.
Exclusionary Rule and Identification Procedures
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
Mock Trial Rules of Evidence Arkansas Bar Association Mock Trial Committee Anthony L. McMullen, J.D., Vice Chair ( )
CJ II Warm-up & Schedule List the nine physical characteristics that victims most often identify? Elements of a Police Lineup - Lecture and Activity.
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
CONFRONTATION ARKANSAS APRIL 2011 MIKE DENTON.
“A-B-C’s” of what you need to know for your mock trials!
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
Criminal Evidence 7th Edition
Introduction to Cross Examination, Impeachment, and Hearsay
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Arizona High School Mock Trial
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Criminal Evidence Marjie Britz Chapter Ten: Hearsay
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
AGENDA Brief Lecture on Chapters courtroom evidence and jury selections and juries Film, 12 angry men Written exercise
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2016.
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
DEFENDING A DFPS CASE : TRIAL: PARENTS CASE
OBJECTIONS.
Principles of Evidence
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Who may impeach a Witness
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Civil Pretrial Practice
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2015.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
CHAP. 4, part A: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY
Business Law Final Exam
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH HEARSAY ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH

Hearsay Defined Federal Rule of Evidence 801(c) defines hearsay as a statement, the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing and a party offers in evidence to prove the TRUTH OF THE MATTER ASSERTED in the statement.

Objections: Overcoming Hearsay Objections https://youtu.be/cmWcUnYg1zI Objections: Overcoming Hearsay Objections Two Examples

Texas Rule 801 (e) : Because the Rule Says So... Rule 801(e) declares 5 exemptions of would be hearsay statements to be non- hearsay simply "because the rule says so." 1.) Prior inconsistent statements 2.) Prior consistent statements offered to rebut a charge of recent fabrication, improper influence or motive 3.) Prior statements of identification of a person made after perceiving the proceeding 4.) Admissions by a party opponent 5.) Depositions taken in the same proceeding

ROBBERY VICTIM & LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH David Bradley is robbed on 01/15/2015, at 11:00 P.M., on the way to his apartment building from parking lot Lot is located next to the building Only light is located directly across from the lot

Bradley Gives Description of Two Men to Police Each were around 25 years of age White Approximately 5’10” 175 lbs. Wearing Blue Jeans and White T-shirt Neither had Beard nor Mustache No Unusual Hair or Noticeable Features

3 Days Later, Bradley is called to the station, to view a line-up 3 Days Later, Bradley is called to the station, to view a line-up.. Upon arrival Bradley is asked if he recognizes anyone in the lineup as his assailants to point him out. Bradley identifies the second person from the left, defendant, Sam Jones.

1.) Prosecution conducts a direct examination of Bradley Establish identity, residence, and place of employment, hours of employment and length at employment What time does Bradley usually get home How is Bradley's vision Do you remember the events of the evening of January 15, 2015 Can you tell us how you felt? Why were you terrified?

Lineup Photo of Robbery Jan 15, 2015 2. Prosecution conducts a direct-examination of Bradley using photo below to illustrate his testimony Lineup Photo of Robbery Jan 15, 2015

2. continuation Bradley identifies the second person from the left as one of the persons who confronted him on Jan 15, 2015.

3.) Defense Cross-examination of Bradley Did they have a weapon? Do you wear prescribed reading glasses? Have you ever had an eye exam? Is there a light post in the parking lot where you parked? Where did the two men approach you? Do any of these hair styles stand out to you?

4. Defense cross-examination of photo *The scenario for this question presumes photo was not introduce as evidence, however, Bradley does identify the defendant in court as one of the robbers. Acting as defense we do have the photo as evidence Were you ever asked by the police to come into the station following the incident on Jan 15, 2015? Were you asked to view a lineup to identify the two men you encountered in the parking lot on the night of the night in question? Were you able to identify anyone in the lineup as the two people you encountered on the night in question.