Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit (SATK)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
Advertisements

Review. 2 TEST A 1.What is the single most important property of vibrating structure? 2. What happens when structure is vibrating in resonance? 3.What.
© Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. All rights reserved Siemens PLM Software Femap 10.3 What’s New Alastair Robertson Femap Marketing.
WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.
FE analysis with 3D elements
Structural Reliability Analysis – Basics
Post-processing J.Cugnoni, LMAF/EPFL, Finite element « outputs » Essential variables:  Displacement u, temperature T find u such that : K u = f.
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
1 Residual Vectors & Error Estimation in Substructure based Model Reduction - A PPLICATION TO WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING - MSc. Presentation Bas Nortier.
Version 4 for Windows NEX T. Welcome to SphinxSurvey Version 4,4, the integrated solution for all your survey needs... Question list Questionnaire Design.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
1 Efficient Re-Analysis Methodology for Probabilistic Vibration of Large-Scale Structures Efstratios Nikolaidis, Zissimos Mourelatos April 14, 2008.
The Finite Element Method
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
Lecture 12 Statistical Inference (Estimation) Point and Interval estimation By Aziza Munir.
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
Disclosure risk when responding to queries with deterministic guarantees Krish Muralidhar University of Kentucky Rathindra Sarathy Oklahoma State University.
1 6. Reliability computations Objectives Learn how to compute reliability of a component given the probability distributions on the stress,S, and the strength,
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
1 Software Reliability Analysis Tools Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana.
Finite Element Analysis
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Tutorial 3, Part 1: Optimization of a linear truss structure
Module 6 Spectrum Analysis.
© 2012 Autodesk A Fast Modal (Eigenvalue) Solver Based on Subspace and AMG Sam MurgieJames Herzing Research ManagerSimulation Evangelist.
ANSYS/LS-DYNA Drop Test Module
Bolted Joint Assembly. Advanced Solid Body Contact Options Goal – In this workshop, our goal is to study the effect that contact stiffness specification.
NESSUS Overview and General Capabilities
© Copyright 2014 Maya Heat Transfer Technologies, Ltd. All rights reserved. date presented to by Carl J. Poplawsky Femap Symposium Ann Arbor, MI. June.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
Learning Theory Reza Shadmehr Distribution of the ML estimates of model parameters Signal dependent noise models.
S3-1 ADM703, Section 3, August 2005 Copyright  2005 MSC.Software Corporation SECTION 3 SUSPENSION SYSTEM.
Confidence Intervals. Point Estimate u A specific numerical value estimate of a parameter. u The best point estimate for the population mean is the sample.
1 Creating Situational Awareness with Data Trending and Monitoring Zhenping Li, J.P. Douglas, and Ken. Mitchell Arctic Slope Technical Services.
Confidence Intervals Cont.
REAR RACK (MODAL) ANALYSIS
WORKSHOP 2 SOLID-TO-SOLID CONTACT
TUTORIAL 4 POST-PROCESSING
Probability and Statistics
Active HTML Rediscovered
ILC MDI Platform Concept
MS Access Forms, Queries, Reports Matt Martin
Martin Shaw – Reliability Solutions
Tutorial 5: Working with Excel Tables, PivotTables, and PivotCharts
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014
Chapter 2 Response to Harmonic Excitation
Acoustic excitation and mechanical analysis of a satellite antenna
Global Local Analysis Pierre-Luc Messier, ing. FEMAP SYMPOSIUM 2018
Femap API Introduction
Simulation: Sensitivity, Bootstrap, and Power
Statistics Review ChE 477 Winter 2018 Dr. Harding.
Introduction to Instrumentation Engineering
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
OVERVIEW OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Lecture 2: Frequency & Time Domains presented by David Shires
Databases and Information Management
Estimating a Population Mean:  Known
FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Optimization under Uncertainty
Presentation transcript:

Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit (SATK) Pierre-Luc Messier, ing. FEMAP SYMPOSIUM 2018 May 22nd 2018

Agenda Structural Analysis Toolkit Overview Random Processor & Demo Energy Processor & Demo Questions and Discussion

Agenda Structural Analysis Toolkit Overview Random Processor & Demo Energy Processor & Demo Questions and Discussion

Overview - SATK Femap Interface Embedded inside Femap

Overview - SATK Femap Interface Tools List of tools you can use with the selected OP2 file Active tools depend on datablocks available in OP2 file If Quick Open was used, it is your responsibility to select the proper tool

Overview - SATK Femap Interface Quick Open Does not scan the OP2 file Enables all processors except Stress, Grid Point Forces and Element Forces because they require subcase information Opening a new file overwrites the current settings Open Select the NASTRAN OP2 file to process Scanned datablocks are displayed in main form window Set Project Define the project directory and prefix name of all results files By default, the OP2 directory and name are used

Overview - SATK Femap Interface Import from Active FEMAP Model Only nodes and elements are retrieved Groups with nodes AND elements will be split Imported groups cannot be modified, but can be copied When groups have identical names, only the first occurrence is imported Import from Nastran File Reads the SETs Automatically determine the entity type Can automatically find the group name Import from Universal File Datasets: 2435, 2452, 2417, 2467, 2477, 3062

Overview - Benefits Efficient and accurate random and sine base-driven solutions from NASTRAN normal modes Processes very large models Tools to understand the modal behavior of complex assemblies Efficient post-processing of Nastran results Sorts, envelops, filters Summaries by groups and subcases Margins of safety from Von Mises stresses, ply failure metrics Direct manipulation of .OP2 file No need to load large results files into graphical post-processor

Overview - Compatibility Supports NX & MSC Nastran Windows & Linux platforms SAToolkit contours can be post-processed in FEMAP HTML, MS Excel®, text automatic report generation

Agenda Structural Analysis Toolkit Overview Random Processor & Demo Energy Processor & Demo Questions and Discussion

Random Processor - Overview It reads results of normal modes (SOL 103) analysis and evaluates responses of a structure subjected to a random base driven acceleration Earthquake ground motion Acoustic excitation due to rocket and jet engine noise Using an efficient modal approach, it replaces all steps following the initial NASTRAN normal modes solution (sol108 and sol 111)

Random Processor – Feature Overview Statistics are required to assess the probability of the response’s magnitude Random theory assumes that the input follows a Gaussian distribution. The same assumption applies to the response Source: Wikipedia

Random Processor – Feature Overview Zero mean Gaussian probability density function Peak value of x is Peak = c * RMS The probability of x lying in the interval –cσ and +cσ where c > 0.0:

Random Processor – Feature Overview Examples of response quantities that do not follow Gaussian distributions Von Mises Stress Tsai-Wu composite failure index

Random Processor – Feature Overview For response quantities that do not follow Gaussian distributions: Relationship between probability density function and standard deviation sigma no longer holds Hence it is not meaningful to express the peak results as a function of the standard deviation, for example 3-sigma To evaluate response quantities that do not follow Gaussian distributions, numerical approximations are required.

Random Processor – Feature Overview True peak stresses and failure metrics based on a confidence level that is either: Directly specified, or Equivalent to a specified standard deviation for a Gaussian probability density function eg 99.73% = 3 sigma No need to scale RMS results

Random Processor – Feature Overview High-performance integration algorithm Does not require frequency card (FREQ) definition You won’t have to worry about defining too few or too many Avoids the risk of error by under-specification of number of computation frequencies You only need to supply the minimum and maximum frequency bounds for the simulation

Random Processor – Benefits Fast Processing Efficient OP2 reader Fast approximation Parallelization Hybrid integration Analytical where possible Only integrates on a subset of the responses Output direct to NX/FEMAP, Excel Accuracy Uses Nastran eigenvectors Residual flexibility/Residual vectors Integration scheme does not force you to define solution frequencies Evaluation of peak Von Mises stress and composite failure metrics

Random Processor - Demo Antenna

Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit Structural Analysis Toolkit Overview Random Processor & Demo Energy Processor & Demo Questions and Discussion

Energy Processor – Overview Energy processor offers 2 criteria that can help in understanding modal behavior : Strain energy Can help to identify regions in your model that can be modified to yield the biggest changes in modal results. Kinetic energy Can help to identify regions with a combination of high responses and participating mass. Can be used to evaluate candidate locations for accelerometers in modal or vibration tests. Similar to Random processor, the Energy processor reads information from a normal modes analysis. FEMAP groups can be imported into the processor. Critical modes and groups, in which strain and/or kinetic energies are high, can easily be identified in the processor's Excel output. Kinetic Strain energy Provides a thorough understanding of modal behavior in assemblies

Energy Processor - Overview Critical modes and groups, in which strain and/or kinetic energies are high, can easily be identified in the processor's Excel output.

Energy Processor – Overview Reference Total is the total modal energy for all elements in the model Should be as close as possible to 100.0 % This depends on THRESH / TINY Total depends on the elements in your groups If you have duplicates, it may easily exceed 100.0 %

Energy Processor – Overview Menu available for Groups only Output Option Modes for a Group lists modes with the highest energy in decreasing order, from left to right, for the specified group Groups for a Mode lists groups with the highest energy in decreasing order, from top to bottom, for a specified mode

Energy Processor - Demo Antenna

Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit - Summary Advanced post-processing capability for Nastran analyses Efficient, state-of-the-art analytical tools for conducting Nastran modal-based response dynamics simulation ½ Day training available What to remember: SATK Random Processor is unbeatable as for efficiency in calculation (FAST) accuracy of peak Von Mises stress and composite failure metrics