Impact of a Mock-up Ferromagnetic TBM on Plasma Operations in C-Mod

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/15 D. C. McDonald et al, Particle and Energy Transport in Dedicated  *,  and  * Scans in JET ELMy H-modes, IAEA - 20th Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura,
Advertisements

Ss Hefei, China July 19, 2011 Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Center for Plasma-Material Interactions Contact: Flowing.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
HEL pre-design Diego Perini Superconducting solenoid Operation temperature: 4.2 K, current:about 250A, magnetic field: 5 Tesla Cooled by liquid.
EPICS Collaboration Meeting – Aix-en-Provence June 2010 Page 1 ITER welcomes EPICS WD Klotz ITER int. Organiztion That’s me.
Nuclear Physics Year 13 Option 2006 Part 2 – Nuclear Fusion.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
1 st ITPA T&C Meeting, Milan, October WAHPage 1 ITER R&D Needs for Transport & Confinement W.A. Houlberg ITER Organization 1st ITPA Transport.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Physics of fusion power
Summary of Current Test Plan for US DCLL TBM in ITER Neil Morley and the US TBM Participants INL, August
Status of safety analysis for HCPB TBM Susana Reyes TBM Project meeting, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA May 10-11, 2006 Work performed under the auspices of the.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
The main function of the divertor is minimizing the helium and impurity content in the plasma as well as exhausting part of the plasma thermal power. The.
Examples of using Langevin equation to solve FP equation.
A design for the DCLL inboard blanket S. Smolentsev, M. Abdou, M. Dagher - UCLA S. Malang – Consultant, Germany 2d EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California,
1 Lecture #24 Fusion ENGR 303I. 2 Outline Fusion →Definition →Atoms usually used Previous attempts at fusion Current attempts at fusion →International.
Presented by High-Performance Computing in Magnetic Fusion Energy Research Donald B. Batchelor RF Theory Plasma Theory Group Fusion Energy Division.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
Vacuum Photodiodes for Soft X-Ray ITER Tomography Yu.Gott, M.Stepanenko 10th ITPA Meeting, Moscow, 2006.
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
Neutronics Analysis for K-DEMO Blanket Module with Helium coolant June 26, 2013 Presented by Kihak IM Prepared by Y.S. Lee Fusion Engineering Center DEMO.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
/18 Cryogenic thermometry for refrigerant distribution system of JT-60SA Kyohei NATSUME, Haruyuki MURAKAMI, Kaname KIZU, Kiyoshi YOSHIDA, Yoshihiko KOIDE.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
Design Optimization of Toroidal Fusion Shield  Fusion Theory [BLAHBLAHBLAH] Fusion energy production is based on the collision nuclei in a deuterium and.
Base Breeding Blanket and Testing Strategy In FNF Conclusions Derived from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
Characteristics of Transmutation Reactor Based on LAR Tokamak Neutron Source B.G. Hong Chonbuk National University.
Development of tritium breeder monitoring for Lead-Lithium cooled ceramic breeder (LLCB) module of ITER presented V.K. Kapyshev CBBI-16 Portland, Oregon,
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
Design optimization of Toroidal Fusion blanket/shield Basic Fusion Theory The basis for fusion energy production is to collide a deuterium and a tritium.
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
IEA IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT ON NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY OF FUSION REACTORS International Workshop on Subtask Neutronics Report on ENEA activity in 2004 Paola.
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
Presented by High Performance Computing in Magnetic Fusion Energy Research Donald B. Batchelor RF Theory Plasma Theory Group Fusion Energy Division.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
PEER Review of Coil Tolerances and Trim Coil Requirements plus Magnetic Material in Test Cell April 19, 2004 Art Brooks.
MAIN COMPONENTS  INTODUCTION  PRINCIPLE  CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS  PROCESS  ADVANTAGES  DISADVANTAGES  CONCLUSION.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
Design of a feedback control system for KTX Hong Li, on behalf of KTX team The 17th International RFP Workshop, October , 2015, Hefei 1.
Fusion. Examples ● Fusion is the reaction that produces the energy in the sun.
Thermal-hydraulic analysis of unit cell for solid breeder TBM
US Participation in the
Optical Fiber Sensors for Cryogenic applications Presented by: Daniele Inaudi, CTO SMARTEC
DO NOW: Hand in “Density Lab” in your class bin.
DCLL TBM Reference Design
8th Meeting of the ITPA Confinement Database & Modeling Topical Group
Have you ever considered how our future might look like if we had access to infinite, cheap, and ecological energy sources?
Preparation of activation experiments for ITER material characterization and data validation in the Deuterium–Tritium JET campaign T. Vasilopoulou &
Can We achieve the TBR Needed in FNF?
Species Effects on the H-mode Threshold and ELM Behavior in H(He3) and He4(H) Plasmas in C-Mod J A Snipes, P Lamalle ITER Organization.
MHD Induced Fast Ion Loss Diagnostic for Alcator C-Mod
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Nuclear Power.
Status of Vertical Neutron Camera Integration
Toroidal Fusion Shielding Design Project
The Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT) Neutron Source
ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.
Methane Screening on C-MOD EDA ELM-mitigated Plasmas Jim Strachan, PPPL Nov. 30, 2004 Goal: compare impurity behavior in ELM mitigated plasmas – ergodic.
NTM Stability at Low Collisionality
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
Nuclear Fission and Fusion
Nuclear Analyses for two “Look-alike” HCPB Blanket Sub-modules for Testing in ITER Mahmoud Z Youssef UCLA Presented at ITER-TBM4 Meeting, UCLA, March 2-4,
ElectroMagnetic Induction
Presentation transcript:

Impact of a Mock-up Ferromagnetic TBM on Plasma Operations in C-Mod J A Snipes, L Giancarli, A Loarte This is a proposal for a series of experiments to investigate the impact of a mock-up ITER ferromagnetic test blanket module on plasma operations in C-Mod. ITER Organization, St Paul-lez-Durance, France

Helium Cooled Lithium-Lead Test Blanket Module To give you all an idea of what a Test Blanket Module is, here I show as an example the design of the EU Helium Cooled Lithium-Lead TBM. The purpose of this TBM is to test tritium breeding methods with flowing liquid lithium-lead that will be bombarded by neutrons from the fusion reactions in ITER. Despite the complexity, it is basically a large piece of ferromagnetic material 1.66 m tall by nearly half a meter wide containing 1300 kg of ferromagnetic steel. There are two modules mounted next to one another in a horizontal port and there will be a total of six modules in 3 ITER ports (#16, #18 AND #2) at 0 and ±40° toroidally. Since these designs will soon be finalized for construction, ITER urgently needs to know what impact such a mass of ferromagnetic material will have on plasma operation. Mass of ferromagnetic steel = 1300 kg Six TBMs to be installed with two in each horizontal port at  = 0° and ±40° 2

TBM Effects on Plasma Operations 30 G 60 G TBM induced stray fields can: Affect the plasma breakdown Modify the plasma equilibrium Enhance magnetic braking of v Produce locked modes through increased 2/1 error field Possibly affect the H-mode threshold Reduce thermal confinement in H-mode and L-mode Increase energetic particle losses The TBMs when immersed in the magnetic field of ITER will produce a stray field that will penetrate into the plasma. Vacuum field calculations such as shown here indicate a stray field from two TBMs of order 0.07 T will be induced at the last closed flux surface with of order 30 G at the plasma center. Such stray fields can affect plasma breakdown and will need to be compensated to maintain a proper null. They can also modify the plasma equilibrium and calculations indicate as much as a 12 mm radial bulge will be created by the TBMs. Stray fields also increase the m=2, n=1 error field and can lead to locked modes. Stray fields may also affect the H-mode threshold. Experiments on JET show that enhanced TF ripple reduces H-mode confinement noticeably even with as low as 0.5% ripple. Since the localized ripple induced by the TBMs has predominantly low toroidal mode numbers, it may penetrate deeper into the plasma and have effects not only on H-mode but also on L-mode confinement. Calculations and experiments also show that enhanced TF ripple leads to increased energetic particle losses, which could lead to first wall damage in ITER. 3 3

Proposed TBM Physics Experiments Motivation: ITER urgent need for final TBM design, may affect TBM size, proximity to plasma, & TBM correction coils Goals: Quantify effects of a mock-up ferromagnetic TBM on breakdown, equilibrium, plasma rotation, locked modes, H-mode threshold and confinement, and energetic particle losses in C-Mod as a function of collisionality to attempt to extrapolate the results to ITER conditions Plan of execution: Design, build, and install a retractable mock-up TBM coil in a horizontal port to provide an additional ~1% local TF ripple when close to the plasma. Measure TBM mock-up effects on plasma operation at low, intermediate, and high collisionality. Where the effects are largest, repeat experiments retracting the TBM to reduce local additional TF ripple by a factor of 2 and compare the effects on plasma operation. Determine TBM mock-up location where plasma effects are only just measurable. Perhaps, one week of dedicated run time would be required to get all of these results. If the effects are large, it may be difficult to piggy-back on other experiments. Now, let me discuss the proposed TBM-mock-up experiments on C-Mod. The motivation for these experiments is that this is an urgent ITER need to finalize the design of the TBMs and the results of such experiments may affect the TBM size, their proximity to the plasma, and the design of possible TBM correction coils that would be mounted directly to the TBMs. The goals of the experiments are to quantify the effects of a mock-up ferromagnetic TBM on breakdown, equilibrium, plasma rotation, locked modes, the H-mode threshold and confinement, and on energetic particle losses in C-Mod as a function of collisionality so that the results may be extrapolated to ITER. JET ripple experiments show that the effects of ripple on H-mode confinement disappear at high collisionality, so it would be important to start with low collisionality but also scan the collisionality to determine how the TBM effects on the plasma scale with collisionality. The plan of execution would first be to design a retractable mock-up TBM for C-Mod that would be installed on rails into a horizontal port and be large enough to increase the local ripple in front of the TBM mock-up by an additional 1% when the TBM mock-up is close to the plasma. Experiments would first be done at low collisionality and then repeated at intermediate and high collisionality to determine how the effects scale. Where the effects are largest, the experiments would be repeated retracting the TBM mock-up by an amount such as to reduce the local additional TF ripple by a factor of 2 and compare the effects on plasma operation. We would like to determine what is the radial location of the TBM mock-up where plasma effects are only just measureable to attempt to decide where the TBMs should be placed relative to the plasma in ITER. 4 4