CPWR First Quarterly Data Report, 2018

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RIAL Workshop on Successful Labor Inspection Models Actions to Encourage Compliance with Standards and Improve Workers’ Conditions CEATAL Presentation.

Advertisements

27a. Percentage of workers with health insurance, by source and industry, 2010 (Wage-and-salary workers) 86% 85% 82% 80% 90% 68% 89% 83% 95% 62%

Survey of Electrician Work Practices Presented at the 135 th Annual Meeting and Exposition of APHA November 5, 2007 Michael McCann, PhD, CIH Director of.

Section 1: Trends of Hispanic Employment in Construction.

Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS) Senior Management Training Module FN000378/CR/01.

Safety Management and Safety Culture Among Small Construction Firms CPWR Second Quarterly Data Report, 2016.

Safety and Health Perceptions of Construction Workers

IRRS REFRESHER TRAINING Lecture 5

Section 1: Trends of Hispanic Employment in Construction

GS-R-3 vs. ISO 9001:2008 Requirements - 4

I. Trends of Fatal Struck-by Injuries in Construction

Section I: Characteristics of Construction Workers

1. Construction employment in the United States, (All employment)

Note: In 2011, the CFOI switched to OIICS version 2

SEXUAL HARASSMENT A FORM OF ABUSE AGAINST WOMEN

Motorcycle Safety Facts (Illinois Data)

Avian Flu – Contingency plan

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing

Exhibit 2.11 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer to Spouses, Dependents and Partners, 2016 Firm Only Offers Single Coverage.

1. Number of fatalities in construction, caught-in/between and other fatalities*,

Life Saving Rules-Do it Right!

56a. Percentage of construction workers who had no consistent place to receive care when sick, by insurance status and Hispanic ethnicity, 2015.

1. Construction employment in the United States,

29a. Percentage of employees who have at least a high school diploma, by industry, 2015 (All employment)

Quality Aspects and Approaches in Business Statistics

30b. New registrations in construction apprenticeship programs, union versus non-union programs,

Exhibit 14.9 Percentage of Offering Firms whose Largest Plan Covers Care Received at Retail Clinics and, of Those, Percentage of Firms who Offer a Financial.

21a. Temporary workers as a percentage of the workforce, construction versus non-construction,

28a. Percentage of employees having a high school diploma or higher education, by industry, 2005 (All types of employment)

35a. Distribution of products in CPWR’s eLCOSH nano inventory

24b. Average hourly wage in construction, by gender and union status, average (Production workers)

Fatal Injuries among Small Construction Establishments

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY Supporting a dynamic community of practice

Exhibit 14.5 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms Whose Largest Plan Includes a High-Performance or Tiered Provider Network, by Firm.

Exhibit 11.3 Among Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,

Exhibit 11.3 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,

26a. Percentage of workers with health insurance, by source and industry, % 94.7% 92.9% 91.8% 91.0% 89.9% 89.2% 78.3% 73.4% 89.9%

Promoting and Improving Employee Safety, Health, and Well-Being

Exhibit Among Firms Offering Health Benefits with 50 or More Employees, Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled at a Firm That Offers Benefits Through.

Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution is statistically different.

Locating Gas Structures

26a. Percentage of employees covered and source of employment-based health insurance, by industry, 2005 (Wage-and-salary workers) 96%

Low Wage Level* Few Workers Are Lower-Wage

Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution.

Exhibit 8.18 Among Firms Offering Family Coverage and an HSA-Qualified HDHP, Percentage of Firms That Vary Their HSA Contribution for Family Coverage on.

Elevator-related fatalities in construction from 2003 to 2016

8b. Sources of capital needed to start a business in construction, 2012

Exhibit 11.3 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,

Exhibit 11.3 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,

Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.

Exhibit 3.3 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Eligible for Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,

1. Construction employment in the United States, (All employment)

Exhibit 12.7 Among Firms That Offer Health Benefits and Provide Employees the Opportunity to Complete a Health Risk Assessment, The Percentage of Firms.

Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2016 * Estimate is statistically.

Exhibit 3.5 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Covered by Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,

Exhibit 2.10 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Temporary Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.

Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.

Exhibit 10.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Partially or Completely Self-Funded Plans, by Firm Size, * Estimate is statistically different.

Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.

Exhibit 14.8 Among Offering Firms With Fewer Than 500 Employees, Percentage of Employers who Provide Benefits Through a Co-Employment Arrangement with.

Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.

Exhibit 11.3 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,

Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2015 *Distribution.

Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution is statistically different.

Exhibit 3.5 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Covered by Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,

Low Wage Level* Few Workers Are Lower-Wage

Low Wage Level Less Than 35% Earn $23,000 a Year or Less *

Exhibit 14.4 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms Whose Largest Plan Includes a High-Performance or Tiered Provider Network by Firm.

Exhibit 3.3 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Eligible for Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,

Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution.

Presentation transcript:

CPWR First Quarterly Data Report, 2018 Safety Management and Safety Culture among Unionized Construction Firms CPWR First Quarterly Data Report, 2018

Characteristics of Construction Firms

1. Number and percent of construction firms by union status, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors. 3

2. Employment size of construction firms, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

3. Type of companies, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

4. Type of projects worked on in the last three years, union versus non-union, 2017 * Highway, street, and bridge; water and sewer; oil and gas pipeline; etc. **Airports, seaports, train stations, etc. Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

Practices Used on Projects to Promote Safety

5. Awareness and practice of Prevention through Design (PtD), union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

6. Use of specific PtD to promote safety, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

7. Percentage of firms by the number of PtD practiced, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

8. Use of specific organizational safety practices, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

9. Percentage of firms by the number of organizational safety practices adopted, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

10. Use of specific safety policies, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

11. Percentage of firms by the number of safety policies implemented, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

12. Application of emerging technologies to promote safety, union versus non-union, 2017 * Smart helmet, badges with coded electronic information, etc. ** Google Glass, Microsoft Hololens, etc. Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

Safety Culture Indicators

13. Safety culture indicators, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

14. Percentage of firms by the number of safety culture indicators adopted, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

15. Aspects of a world-class safety program, union versus non-union, 2017 (Selected) Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

16. Percentage of firms by the number of safety programs practiced, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

Safety and Health Training

17. General safety and health training, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

18. OSHA training, union versus non-union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.

19. Frequency of general safety and health training, union versus non- union, 2017 Source: Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017 Construction Safety Management Survey. Calculations by the authors.